New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2007

    Default Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Howdy folks,

    Question about invisibility: RAW states that invisibility ends when the invisible target attacks or casts a spell. A beholder eye ray isn't listed as a spell-like ability and isn't a ranged attack. Does it cancel invisibility?
    D20 Modern Complete HTML SRD
    (Contains D20 Modern (core), Urban Arcana, d20 Future and d20 Modern Menace Manual -> In a fun format)

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikeFightwicky View Post
    Howdy folks,

    Question about invisibility: RAW states that invisibility ends when the invisible target attacks or casts a spell. A beholder eye ray isn't listed as a spell-like ability and isn't a ranged attack. Does it cancel invisibility?

    I would say that it is an attack action. Attack actions cancel invisibility unless of course that it is greater invisibility.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Land of Cleves
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    It's not an attack action, because it doesn't involve an attack roll.

    RAW, I don't think it would break invisibility, but I would houserule that it does, because while the eye rays aren't actually spells, they're very similar to them.
    Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
    As You Like It, III:ii:328

    Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
    Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Agree with Chronos. RAW, the answer is no, but I would expect many DMs to overrule that. When they wrote the spell, I don't think they accounted for uses of it on every NPC creature imaginable.
    If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?

    In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.

    Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2018

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    RAW using eye rays does not count as attacks or spells, since they aren’t spells and require saves, not to-hit rolls.

    This has been confirmed in official WotC products where Beholders have access to invisibility.

    In those products, the authors acknowledge that the tactic is cheesy as hell, but the beholder in question is not actually part of the adventure objectives, the PCs are told it is incredibly dangerous, and if they want to fight it, play it as evil as possible.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Misread Ignore!
    Last edited by OzDragon; 2019-06-10 at 08:36 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zuras View Post
    RAW using eye rays does not count as attacks or spells, since they aren’t spells and require saves, not to-hit rolls.

    This has been confirmed in official WotC products where Beholders have access to invisibility.

    In those products, the authors acknowledge that the tactic is cheesy as hell, but the beholder in question is not actually part of the adventure objectives, the PCs are told it is incredibly dangerous, and if they want to fight it, play it as evil as possible.
    You are saying here that they require a character to make a save or something detrimental will happen to them. That would be an attack action at my table. In this instance the Beholder would lose invisibility.
    Last edited by OzDragon; 2019-06-10 at 08:41 AM.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Troll in the Playground
     
    ProsecutorGodot's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by OzDragon View Post
    You are saying here that they require a character to make a save or something detrimental will happen to them. That would be an attack action at my table. In this instance the Beholder would lose invisibility.
    And you're free to rule otherwise, but by the rules an attack must involve an attack roll to be considered as such. This is how we've come to accept the strange conclusion that while Magic Missile is an offensive spell being cast that damages the target, it does not count as making an attack against them.

    RAW is a strange beast and you're encouraged openly by the developers to use your own judgements where the written rules don't work for your table.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Millstone85's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Paris, France
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    I would advise against talking about "attack actions".

    There are several actions, bonus actions, and reactions, that involve making an attack, but only one of these actions is called Attack.

    And yeah, an attack involves an attack roll.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Millstone85 View Post
    I would advise against talking about "attack actions".

    There are several actions, bonus actions, and reactions, that involve making an attack, but only one of these actions is called Attack.

    And yeah, an attack involves an attack roll.
    Yeah, that's up there with hiding and alignment as ways to start a forum fire.
    Dawn of Hope: a 5e setting. http://wiki.admiralbenbo.org
    Rogue Equivalent Damage calculator, now prettier and more configurable!
    5e Monster Data Sheet--vital statistics for all 693 MM, Volo's, and now MToF monsters: Updated!
    NIH system 5e fork, very much WIP. Base github repo.
    NIH System PDF Up to date main-branch build version.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Millstone85 View Post
    I would advise against talking about "attack actions".

    There are several actions, bonus actions, and reactions, that involve making an attack, but only one of these actions is called Attack.

    And yeah, an attack involves an attack roll.
    Ok then lets put it this way.

    Anything that someone does that affects a PC in a negative way via magic or physical means is an attack. One which would break invisibility.

    Again this is at our table.I'm not saying you are doing it wrong.

  12. - Top - End - #12

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zuras View Post
    RAW using eye rays does not count as attacks or spells, since they aren’t spells and require saves, not to-hit rolls.

    This has been confirmed in official WotC products where Beholders have access to invisibility.

    In those products, the authors acknowledge that the tactic is cheesy as ----, but the beholder in question is not actually part of the adventure objectives, the PCs are told it is incredibly dangerous, and if they want to fight it, play it as evil as possible.
    These authors deserve to have cheesy served right back at them: PCs vanish into Darkness, are therefore immune to the beholder's eye rays, and kill it with impunity.

    RAW-obsession is stupidity, and you shouldn't write it into the adventure.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    mAc Chaos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by OzDragon View Post
    Ok then lets put it this way.

    Anything that someone does that affects a PC in a negative way via magic or physical means is an attack. One which would break invisibility.

    Again this is at our table.I'm not saying you are doing it wrong.
    Let's pretend a PC sets up some complicated trap that attacks a monster. The PC is invisible. The monster comes into the room.

    The PC pushes the button to activate the trap and the trap squishes the monster. Did the PC lose invisibility?

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2018

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxWilson View Post
    These authors deserve to have cheesy served right back at them: PCs vanish into Darkness, are therefore immune to the beholder's eye rays, and kill it with impunity.

    RAW-obsession is stupidity, and you shouldn't write it into the adventure.

    Changing how something works just because you think it’s unbalanced isn’t a great solution.

    There is no logical reason why a Cloak of Invisibility functions as a permanent Greater Invisibility while a Ring of Invisibility only provides permanent regular Invisibility, but that’s the way the game works. Maybe the game designers like Harry Potter better than Lord of the Rings. Do you change how those two magic items work in your campaign? Is allowing them to work differently RAW obsession?

    If the designers intended Invisibility not to have that loophole, they could have updated it at the same time they updated Sanctuary.

    If it offends your sense of justice, don’t allow it. Given that the two most obvious abusers of non-attack, non-spell hostile actions are Beholders and Spellcasting Dragons, it doesn’t seem like a major issue. It is literally the difference between a 2nd and 4th level spell on a CR 13+ creature.
    Last edited by Zuras; 2019-06-10 at 01:51 PM. Reason: Fix unclear wording

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by OzDragon View Post
    You are saying here that they require a character to make a save or something detrimental will happen to them. That would be an attack action at my table. In this instance the Beholder would lose invisibility.
    Yes, "at your table". Several of us who said that it's not an attack by RAW have agreed that many DMs would houserule that it becomes visible. No one is saying it's a wrong or bad ruling. When someone asks a question about the RAW, we give them an answer by the RAW.

    But it's important to make a distinction between what's an attack or not. "Doing something bad" to someone is not necessarily an attack and the mechanical distinction is there for good reason. Mirror Image doesn't protect you from save-based spells or effects, for instance; only attacks. It's not intended to be that powerful.
    If you cast Dispel Magic on my Gust of Wind, does that mean you're disgusting?

    In real estate, they say it's all about location, location, location. In D&D I say it's about action economy, action economy, action economy.

    Crystal Mage -- a homebrewed arcane tradition

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Land of Cleves
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    It's not just making a 2nd level spell act like a 4th level spell. If you can do combat stuff without breaking it, Invisibility is much better than Improved Invisibility, because of the longer duration.
    Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
    As You Like It, III:ii:328

    Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
    Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2018

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
    It's not just making a 2nd level spell act like a 4th level spell. If you can do combat stuff without breaking it, Invisibility is much better than Improved Invisibility, because of the longer duration.
    Sure, for PCs. Monsters are different. I haven’t ever had a creature using Greater Invisibility have it end due to expired duration, as opposed to dispel/lost concentration.

  18. - Top - End - #18

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zuras View Post
    Changing how something works just because you think it’s unbalanced isn’t a great solution.
    Changing how something works because you think it's stupid and illogical, however, is.

    There is no logical reason why a Cloak of Invisibility functions as a permanent Greater Invisibility while a Ring of Invisibility only provides permanent regular Invisibility, but that’s the way the game works. Maybe the game designers like Harry Potter better than Lord of the Rings. Do you change how those two magic items work in your campaign? Is allowing them to work differently RAW obsession?

    If the designers intended Invisibility not to have that loophole, they could have updated it at the same time they updated Sanctuary.

    If it offends your sense of justice, don’t allow it. Given that the two most obvious abusers of non-attack, non-spell hostile actions are Beholders and Spellcasting Dragons, it doesn’t seem like a major issue. It is literally the difference between a 2nd and 4th level spell on a CR 13+ creature.
    Sure. Like I said, authors who are obsessed with RAW deserve to have RAW served right back at them. The invisible beholder will die ignominiously against the heavily-obscured PCs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
    It's not just making a 2nd level spell act like a 4th level spell. If you can do combat stuff without breaking it, Invisibility is much better than Improved Invisibility, because of the longer duration.
    It's great (by RAW) for Enchanters, especially high-AC Cleric/Enchanters, for just exactly that reason. You can even still do Instinctive Charm.

    Remember that RAW is a qualifier, not a compliment. It means "don't necessarily expect this to work in a real game."
    Last edited by MaxWilson; 2019-06-10 at 04:20 PM.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalebert View Post
    Yes, "at your table". Several of us who said that it's not an attack by RAW have agreed that many DMs would houserule that it becomes visible. No one is saying it's a wrong or bad ruling. When someone asks a question about the RAW, we give them an answer by the RAW.

    But it's important to make a distinction between what's an attack or not. "Doing something bad" to someone is not necessarily an attack and the mechanical distinction is there for good reason. Mirror Image doesn't protect you from save-based spells or effects, for instance; only attacks. It's not intended to be that powerful.
    Normal invisibility is not supposed to be that powerful either. There is improved invisibility for a reason.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Oct 2014

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Let's go to actual dev answers instead of HIWPI.

    When a monk uses Empty Body, does the invisibility remain in effect after the monk attacks? Yes. The invisibility of the monk’s Empty Body isn’t ended by the monk attacking.

    Does using a bonus action break invisibility from a warlock’s One with Shadows invocation? Taking a bonus action breaks the invisibility of a warlock’s One with Shadows. A bonus action is an action.

    If I’m invisible and I become visible when I shoot an arrow at a target, does hiding again require an action? Without a special ability, hiding in combat requires the Hide action.

    Take from that what you will. Seems to be that as long as the conditions aren't stated or met that you don't break invisibility. Specific wording matters.
    Last edited by Kyutaru; 2019-06-10 at 04:31 PM.
    Trolls will be blocked. Petrification works far better than fire and acid.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Millstone85's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Paris, France
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxWilson View Post
    Remember that RAW is a qualifier, not a compliment. It means "don't necessarily expect this to work in a real game."
    That would make it a critique, and imply that house rules and DM fiat should be expected to work any better.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Land of Cleves
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    You might not see the duration run out for a monster, but duration will still make a difference on when they're likely to cast it. Buffs are most effective when cast before combat starts. It's a lot easier for an NPC to say "I'm likely to meet enemies at some point in the next hour" than to say "I'm likely to meet enemies at some point in the next minute".
    Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
    As You Like It, III:ii:328

    Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
    Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BloodSnake'sCha's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Guys, there are attacks with no attack rolls, look at grapple/shove.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by BloodSnake'sCha View Post
    Guys, there are attacks with no attack rolls, look at grapple/shove.
    Yes, but those (in the fashion of D&D) are specific exceptions. If they didn't say they were attacks, they wouldn't be. So you cannot use those to reason to anything else.

    Exception based games require an explicit statement of exception to basic rules. And the basic rules require an attack roll for an attack. Changing that globally breaks...lots of stuff. Many many features and spells only react/trigger on attacks. Now they trigger on anything that might be considered a hostile action. That's a huge change.
    Dawn of Hope: a 5e setting. http://wiki.admiralbenbo.org
    Rogue Equivalent Damage calculator, now prettier and more configurable!
    5e Monster Data Sheet--vital statistics for all 693 MM, Volo's, and now MToF monsters: Updated!
    NIH system 5e fork, very much WIP. Base github repo.
    NIH System PDF Up to date main-branch build version.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2007

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    So by RAW, the following do not break invisibility, right?

    1. Blowing a horn to call reinforcements
    2. Blowing a horn of blasting to smite your foes
    3. Blowing a horn of blasting harmlessly into the air to call reinforcements


    Those are all an "Action", not an "Attack (action)" (an attack action being, by RAW, a melee or ranged attack).
    What about wands? A Wand of Binding lets you cast certain spells on command, or gain advantage on a roll. I assume you'd only pop out of invisibility if you use the Spells action and not the Assisted Escape action?

    Also if it's house ruled that ability that triggers a save count as an attack, then yeah, that would cover stuff like beholder eye rays.
    D20 Modern Complete HTML SRD
    (Contains D20 Modern (core), Urban Arcana, d20 Future and d20 Modern Menace Manual -> In a fun format)

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BloodSnake'sCha's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2016

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoenixPhyre View Post
    Yes, but those (in the fashion of D&D) are specific exceptions. If they didn't say they were attacks, they wouldn't be. So you cannot use those to reason to anything else.

    Exception based games require an explicit statement of exception to basic rules. And the basic rules require an attack roll for an attack. Changing that globally breaks...lots of stuff. Many many features and spells only react/trigger on attacks. Now they trigger on anything that might be considered a hostile action. That's a huge change.
    So you get my point, good :)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpikeFightwicky View Post
    So by RAW, the following do not break invisibility, right?

    1. Blowing a horn to call reinforcements
    2. Blowing a horn of blasting to smite your foes
    3. Blowing a horn of blasting harmlessly into the air to call reinforcements


    Those are all an "Action", not an "Attack (action)" (an attack action being, by RAW, a melee or ranged attack).
    What about wands? A Wand of Binding lets you cast certain spells on command, or gain advantage on a roll. I assume you'd only pop out of invisibility if you use the Spells action and not the Assisted Escape action?

    Also if it's house ruled that ability that triggers a save count as an attack, then yeah, that would cover stuff like beholder eye rays.
    Basically, yes.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    mAc Chaos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Does a Beholder eye ray break its Invisibility?

    I think it's fine. I mean, why should the invisibility wear off if you attack anyway? It's just how the spell works. So if some things break it and some don't, who cares.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •