New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 10 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 271 to 300 of 375
  1. - Top - End - #271
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Amalthea
    :P If someone says they're taking the action of bonking someone on the head with a lead sheet, and made their attack role, I'd tell the victim to make a Fortitude save, because it's realistic that someone hit in the head with a lead sheet would be either stunned or knocked completely unconscious. I don't particularly care if the rules don't cover the situation.
    My point is that regardless of one's current sum of hitpoints, it is realistic for someone hit in the head with ~65 pounds of lead to be knocked unconscious. ::)
    Thats where things also get grey because HP isn't just damage.

    If you strike someone with 100hp and inflict 10hp of damage, it wasn't a direct head on blow. A glance or near miss. That would be like the sheet of lead hitting a shoulder or arm as they move to the side.

    I agree that logic is logic, but sometimes you have to look within how the rules define their own logic and play with that. Otherwise you end up with cases where players look to play the logic game to sidestep the rules.

    And really at that point, a sheet of lead makes a better weapon than a greatsword because it bypasses subdual damage and you end up with Metal Sheet Specializions in the party... ;D

  2. - Top - End - #272
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Danville

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    He does not enjoy killing people
    Um...what? Seriously though, have you read the strip. He's killed pretty much everything Roy hasn't prevented him from killing. He even tried to kill Elan for exp.

  3. - Top - End - #273
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Denaes
    And really at that point, a sheet of lead makes a better weapon than a greatsword because it bypasses subdual damage and you end up with Metal Sheet Specializions in the party... ;D
    *There' already dozens of tactics involving metal sheets. For example wall of iron, reduce/item spell, fly, drop small metal plate on enemy as you dismiss the reduce spell. Ergo - a few hundred pounts on metal landing on an opponent. Ka-squish

    *Metal sheets on floor, big nasty paladin walking down the corridor in shiney full plate. Lightning bolt from around the corner on the floor = char grilled paladin

    *Metal sheet fastened to wall. Custom magnetic spell on metal sheet, any clank clank warriors who walk by are now stuck to the wall.

    But if 3.x regards 'unconsciousnes' as hit point loss there is something wrong there. By that token you could beat someone around the head with a sap/lead pipe/truncheon for hours and they would laugh at you. Ditto with a garotte.

  4. - Top - End - #274
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    well, i beleive the WANG noise is a direct result of the lead sheets original excuse as proof of his manhood. which is humorous.

    as for where its going... this has a very bugs bunny and elmer fudd feel to it. i suspect that the wascaly wabbit is going to win. but how he gets there is anyone guess.

    great comic.

  5. - Top - End - #275
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc

    But if 3.x regards 'unconsciousnes' as hit point loss there is something wrong there.
    You're "unconscious" when you run out of subdual damage.

    The whole point of having 100 hp (a good amount for a 10th level Fighter) is that it's a measure of luck, skill & toughness. So you can't just get a single punch and KO someone who is that skilled.

    Now I think there are alternatives that deal with being flatfooted (ie, not evading the blow).

    I can't recall for sure. Having played D&D in about a year. Been running Spycraft 2.0 and that handles some of these principals differently.

    But really, it's a tradeoff. If you allow PCs to be auto KOed by a sucker punch, then how they can hope to stand up against 30 orcs and a dragon? You might be placing expectations you'd have for a normal person on someone who is for all intents & purposes a trained superhuman.

    You'd want a game that was less "heroic" and more "grim/gritty"

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    By that token you could beat someone around the head with a sap/lead pipe/truncheon for hours and they would laugh at you. Ditto with a garotte.
    If by "beating someone for hours" you mean about a combat lasting about a minute (in game) or longer, then yeah.

    I can't see combats lasting an hour in game. And if you're in a combat beating someone down for hour and rolling dice all that time, it's time your GM just make a call that you took the guy down or he laughs at your puny attempts and walks away... or start a real combat.

  6. - Top - End - #276
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    First, I totally agree that Belkar is an id with feet. This leads him to do anything he can get away with that crosses his mind.

    I think most people who deny Belkar as being CE is that he doesn't lockstep into the "I will rule the world! Muhahaha!" types. He is most definately an evil, nasty, psychopathic halfling. He's my favorite PC.

    Miko irritates me. I've played a paladin or two in my day, and loved playing them, so that's not the problem. It's just her attitude, and you don't lose powers on attitude, no matter how much everyone around you wants it to happen.

    Spoiler Thoughts:
    The duel will be cut short by an outside event, leaving further, unresolved tension. This event will certainly mean that the situation is far beyond the capacity of the Sapphire Guard to properly punish Belkar.

    Quite honestly, if you have read Xykon and Redcloak have been up to, where they are located, what they intend to do with the legions of hobgoblins, and the oft mentioned "evilgasm", and considering this is about the time in a campaign for the obligatory battle, I think Azure City will be under seige soon. I also wouldn't put it out of possibility that Belkar and Miko are the ones to find out first.


    Lastly, you can realistically cold-clock someone in perfect health with a 1D6 pool-cue on the first swing, provided it's critical. A 68 pound sheet of lead is going to really hurt.

  7. - Top - End - #277
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    PhoeKun's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Denaes

    I agree that logic is logic, but sometimes you have to look within how the rules define their own logic and play with that. Otherwise you end up with cases where players look to play the logic game to sidestep the rules.
    And sometimes you're reading a comic loosely based on D&D rules that twists and sometimes even breaks those rules for the sake of a joke or the plot. On the off-chance you happen to be reading such a comic, logic will probably serve you better than encycolpedic knowledge of the rules. ;)

    Of course, if such a comic were real, it would probably involve stick figures with not-quite-stick bodies fighting an evil lich who is trying to open some sort of gate in an effort to conquer the world (or perhaps the multiverse). There may be paladins who would cause controversy, and perhaps a group of villains who are the main characters' evil opposites.

    Unfortunately, as far as I know, no such comic exists...

  8. - Top - End - #278
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Denaes
    If by "beating someone for hours" you mean about a combat lasting about a minute (in game) or longer, then yeah.
    I was of course trying to highlight the broken rule, not being literal. Though not by much - a sap inflicted 1-3 points of damage. Assuming no damage bonuses and an average of 2 points damage against a 50 hp fighter, the user could spend roughly 1/2 and hour achieving nothing, longer if the target has more hit points, regen/heal items. Of course if someone is trying to knock you out you dont stand there and take it. The whole point of knockout weapons was to quickly incapicate an opponent who could be a threat.

    By the same token, suppose in a barroom brawl, when somone who bench presses Volkswagons king hits his targets jaw, the target isn't going anywhere except in a heap on the floor, and thats with just a fist (normal fist not a super ninja monk attack).

    The old rules for knockout weapons was you required surprise, an opponent with an unarmoured head (no helmets), a sucessful hit (at -4 on the roll for called shot) and then you had a 5% chance per strength point of knocking them out.

    Much better ruling IMHO - and as for not being heroic it worked both ways, heros could whack the evil high priest(tm) before he started flinging holy words and death fingers everywhere. And the care bear types could merely knock guards unconscious instead of giving them a permanent dirt nap. It also meant helmets were more than a fashion accessory which obsucred eyesight and hearing.



  9. - Top - End - #279
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by PhoeKun

    And sometimes you're reading a comic loosely based on D&D rules that twists and sometimes even breaks those rules for the sake of a joke or the plot. On the off-chance you happen to be reading such a comic, logic will probably serve you better than encycolpedic knowledge of the rules. ;)
    I was quoting someone who was talking about the use of a lead sheet in a tabletop D&D game, not a comic.

    I have never stated any problems with how GMs (or comic writers) use dramatic events that make for a better story. Just talking D&D rules and what bringing in a weapon that auto-KOed would do.

  10. - Top - End - #280
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Behind you..go ahead and check

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by jmucchiello
    Are they evil sharks?
    Everyone knows sharks are good, unless they have fricking laser beams attached to their frickin heads, then they are pure evil.
    Also, by advancing the plot and creating an interesting backstory with Miko, Belkar is piling more XP on the -possible- killing of Miko.
    It was like two ninjas taped together to make one giant ninja...

  11. - Top - End - #281
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    I was of course trying to highlight the broken rule, not being literal.
    Hmm, I use broken to mean that a rule doesn't acheive what it's supposed to. I guess you could use broken for all sorts of things you don't like.

    In that case D&D 2e was broken because my whole group hated it :D Just kidding

    Though not by much - a sap i
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    nflicted 1-3 points of damage. Assuming no damage bonuses and an average of 2 points damage against a 50 hp fighter, the user could spend roughly 1/2 and hour achieving nothing, longer if the target has more hit points, regen/heal items. Of course if someone is trying to knock you out you dont stand there and take it. The whole point of knockout weapons was to quickly incapicate an opponent who could be a threat.
    No, the whole point of KO weapons is to take out opponents who are pretty weak.

    D&D is a heroic RPG, not grim/gritty. It's about kicking in the door and taking names, not going down in one hit because of a low level character with a sap is attacking you.

    They're both mutually exclusive and can't exist together. Just a connundrum of role playing.

    You're either playing a heroic game or a grim/gritty game. You can't be heroic if the rules make you vulnerable to a wimp with a pipe and you can't have a grim/gritty game if you can laugh off glancing blows by running up walls, jumping over opponents and other crazy combat moves.

    Grim/Gritty you're afraid of that random attack that can cripple or take you out.

    So thats not a fault of the rule as you not liking the genre tropes

  12. - Top - End - #282
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by yuccadude
    Also, by advancing the plot and creating an interesting backstory with Miko, Belkar is piling more XP on the -possible- killing of Miko.
    Talking about milking the ep's, there is an argument that went Miko when down combat ended with Balkar being the winner. XP awarded.

    Miko wakes up and a new combat begins. If he wins again, he's defeated her twice.

    Oppenents can be worth more ep alive than dead at times :D

  13. - Top - End - #283
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Denaes
    In that case D&D 2e was broken because my whole group hated it :D Just kidding
    No problem, I loathed it as well, which is why we played edition 1.5 (a mix of 1 and 2). Oh and the sap was in 1st ed Unearthed Arcana. I cant remember it in 2ed, though it may have been in one of the fifty billion 'powers books' they cranked out. :P

    D&D is a heroic RPG, not grim/gritty. It's about kicking in the door and taking names, not going down in one hit because of a low level character with a sap is attacking you.
    Not so much grim and gritty I would say as the difference between suspension of disbelief and breaking it.

    For example by the rules its entirely possible for a strong fighter to jump of a 2000 foot cliff, hit the ground leaving a crater, get up and then smite a horde of goblins singly handedly with a fork. An extreme example of course, but quite possible with enough hit points. The worst example I ever saw was a fighter shot at point blank range by a tank (it was in a _very_ short lived planer / cross campaign game). He didnt even flinch and then proceeded to chop the tank to bits with a battle axe (players walked out after that, me included).

    Heroic? Definetly not. It's Roadrunner vs Coyote stuff.

    KO rules, overbearing and grappling give the heros a sharp wakeup call they are not gods, without having to throw more super monsters at them (resulting in more ill gained XP and magic items). A mob of rampaging peasants can quickly bring down even a epic level fighter by sheer numbers if he pushes them too far.

    Of course it can be taken too far the other way where heros cant walk down the street without dozens of sap wielding thieves rushing out at them, or where heros try to KO a dragon with a club.

    I look for a happy medium.

  14. - Top - End - #284
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    A quick comment to those who keep bringing up the matter of Miko breaking the court order. Read #228 again - the order doesn't prevent her from using Detect Evil, it merely prohibits her from using it to detect his alignment. It's pretty clear on that, since Belkar's argument is based on illegal search, preventing her from using any such divination abilities to invade his privacy.

    Given that, her use of Detect Evil in the latest strip is perfectly legit, since she's using it not to detect his alignment, but to confirm that the figure in the bush is him, not another decoy. She says as much, commenting "it didn't prevent me from finding you".

  15. - Top - End - #285
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    For example by the rules its entirely possible for a strong fighter to jump of a 2000 foot cliff, hit the ground leaving a crater, get up and then smite a horde of goblins singly handedly with a fork.
    Well, there arn't rules for leaving crators on the ground.

    The falling part is 100% realistic. people fall that far and walk away from the landing spot. Is it likely? Not very.

    Remember, this is a "Heroic" RPG, meaning that after a few levels you're soundly leaving the realm of human (ie, real world) plausability. So the higher level your characters, the more Heroic they will become.

    If playing Heroic characters is an issue with suspension of disbelief, then D&D isn't trying to emulate the game physics you want. You want a more "Grim/Gritty" game that is less heroic and more down to earth.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    An extreme example of course, but quite possible with enough hit points. The worst example I ever saw was a fighter shot at point blank range by a tank (it was in a _very_ short lived planer / cross campaign game). He didnt even flinch and then proceeded to chop the tank to bits with a battle axe (players walked out after that, me included).
    Thats not how the rules handle HP. The player wasn't hit with a direct blast. Slightly bad GMing in the description of damage and reaction.

    There are options to explain the damage:

    *A near enough miss to cause superficial damage.
    *The player pulled a neo and barely moved out of the way, but not fully.
    *Very close miss, but sonic shockwave & heat caused a bit of damage and tired him out.

    It all has to be explained in a way that makes sense to the situation. HP isn't flesh wound damage. Not every hit with a sword breaks the skin, let alone stabs into your body. There are many cases of incidental damage, tiring, luck, etc.

    Getting hit dead on with a tank gun would be death. That means that the character failed to move out of it's direct path because he tripped, was too tired, didn't notice it. Whatever. That's the mechanic of running out of HP. Once you start getting really low on HP, body tearing damage starts taking place.

    The description of HP damage and it's effects are very much so common sense. Also, there isn't any way short of a magic force field that a character would take a full on direct hit or a near miss without moving, let alone flinching and diving for cover. Bad descrption making the rules look really stupid.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    Heroic? Definetly not. It's Roadrunner vs Coyote stuff.
    Well, I would say that is the definition of Heroic. If you had a GM who didn't put any creativity into events, yeah it comes out lame.

    The first situation, here is what happened: The character falls off a cliff and on the way down starts to grab at roots and rocks, acheiving nothing more than scraping his hands. The character notices the rocky base of the cliff and knows it spells certain doom, so in a last ditch effort he pushes off the cliff away from the rody base area going into a tumble and crashing into the ground at a 40 degree angle reducing the damage by quite a bit. Staggered but thankful to be alive, he stands up and realizes that he's standing in a goblin burial ground... in the middle of a burial and the goblins look none too happy.

    That is heroic. Like something out of Indiana Jones. You use your environment.

    Now if the character takes any amound of damage (what is that 20d6, half with a reflex save?) there is the massive damage rules. The character makes a save or dies. Success is a stunned condition I believe.

    The second situation could be explained like so:

    The barbarian sizes up this metal war machine. Is it an arcane contraption? Surely it's evil. It's head turns towards the barbarian.. to speak? Possibly spew fire? The Barbarian continues to heft his mighty battle axe while circling his prey. Suddenly a booming sound erupts from it's cannon and the barbarian throws himself to the ground to get raked over with a wave of heat and shards of broken rock & metal. The barbarian is back up on his feet and charges the machine, jumping on top of it and repeatidly smashing his axe into it's hull. Each hit resounds with gonging noise and sparks flying. Bit by bit the barbarian finds softer areas to tear apart as his Axe starts to break apart under the strain...

    Now I'm not sure what kind of tank stats were being used. I'd assume a high DR and that would mean if the Axe was non magical there was a good chance of breaking. If it's magical, there really isn't much more logic to it than that. I know there are plenty of softer spots on a tank to attack wtih a weapon.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyc
    Of course it can be taken too far the other way where heros cant walk down the street without dozens of sap wielding thieves rushing out at them, or where heros try to KO a dragon with a club.

    I look for a happy medium.
    in an issue of KoDT, the party ended up hiring their own army of beggars to overbear their opponents so they could Coup de Grace them :D

    It seems like your happy medium is below D&D's heroic mark. There are other games that are well suited for that sort of thing.

  16. - Top - End - #286
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re:

    Quote Originally Posted by N/A
    in an issue of KoDT, the party ended up hiring their own army of beggars to overbear their opponents so they could Coup de Grace them
    Yup the infamous 'beggar mob rule'.

    For those who dont know - in the Hackmaster game the players were playing there were two obsucre rules hidden in the books.

    1) Mobs automatically overbear their targets

    2) A group of 15 or more beggars is a mob of beggars

    So they hit on the idea of recruiting hordes of beggars to take down dragons, towns, etc. I wonder if there will be a Bag War with Haley's bags of holding....

    It seems like your happy medium is below D&D's heroic mark. There are other games that are well suited for that sort of thing
    I prefer it that way, as too much heroic gets cheesy, to little is no fun. As for really gritty - get the old Cyberpunk games. If you lived for more than a few sessions without being shot, eaten, mangled, insta-killed, etc you were doing very well. ;)

    As for my D&D opinions about heroic, they're very much influenced by the Ravenloft campaign series (old version, not the cheesy later version). Heros had to work damn hard to be heroic, otherwise they were just another person trying to survive. (eg: similiar to Call of Cuthulu).

  17. - Top - End - #287
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Best Belkar/Miko comic ever! So, he loves her and they're gonna get married and have halfhalflings... right? :D

  18. - Top - End - #288
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    CaptN's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Between Heaven and Hell
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    It's truely refreshing to hear D&D concidered "Heroic Level" play. Over at a few other forums I frequent, Exalted is heroic level and many discribe D&D as "a bunch of farmboys who barely know how to use their weapons". And yes, I've had the same argument with another GM friend of mine on the topic of the KO hit. This is what we came up with that we were pretty happy with, so i just thought I'd through it out there.

    Crunchstuff
    KO Punch:
    To deliever a KO punch, several factors must be taken into acount.
    1.) The target must not be aware of the Attacker (I.E. must be taken by suprise)
    2.) The weapon used MUST be disigned to do Subdual damage (I.E. No sword flats to the back of the head)
    3.) The Target must not be on "High Alert" (I.E.if the guard has been warned that there are several intruders in his area, he is on "High Alert". If the Guard is a layabout or not expecting anything, he's not on "High Alert")

    An attack roll is made against the target's Flat-footed AC. If it misses, the target knows he's been attacked and combat starts normally. If it connects, damage is rolled. The entire total (including an Sneak attack damage)=x. The target makes a Fort save DC: 10 (15 if the feat Improved KO Punch is taken) + x. If he fails the Fort save, he's knocked unconcious for x minates. If the target makes the saveing through he takes subdual damage equal to 1/2 x and is probably ticked off at being wacked on the head.


    With this rule, your level is taken into acount in both the attack and the target. The sword swings both ways, however, so the players could be knocked out as well. One final, unoffical, rule was that this was a non-leathal move. If it was used by some "enterpriseing" player for easy kills, s/he will be warned once. Past that, the guards will suddenly all be on "High alert". After all, they've probably heard of that horrible demon that knocks people out before it guts them, and they're justifiably scared.

    Finally, and back on topic, I think Belkar has something up his sleave. A plan is deffinatly in the mix.
    Random Stats:
    Chickens Kicked: 0
    TPK (as Player): 1
    TPK (as DM): 5
    D20s Melted: 1

    Any and all typos in the former post are the result of a sick mind on the part of the reader. Get help, man!

    I was a rather heavy poster a long time ago in the old forums (heck, I helped start the old 3.5 attempt at a democratic forum campaign setting!) and I thought I'd stick my head back in. Hi again!

  19. - Top - End - #289
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde
    A quick comment to those who keep bringing up the matter of Miko breaking the court order. Read #228 again - the order doesn't prevent her from using Detect Evil, it merely prohibits her from using it to detect his alignment. It's pretty clear on that, since Belkar's argument is based on illegal search, preventing her from using any such divination abilities to invade his privacy.".
    SO I reread 228 again as you suggested and here is what it had to say

    We have therefore filed an injunction against further uses of the Detect Evil power, the Detect Evil spell, OR other class or race ability that might divine incriminating facts about my client.
    I will first off grant that there are as many or more different and valid possible interpertations of that passage as there are words in it and yours is certainly one of those.

    Mine would be as follows

    Miko is prohibited BY LAW from using the Detect Evil power in any way shape or form

    Miko is prohibited BY LAW from using the Detect Evil spell in any way shape or form.

    AND

    Miko is prohibited BY LAW from using any other class or race ability that might divine incriminating facts about Belkar

    I state BY LAW because it is a legally binding document that Miko agreed was both legal and binding when she submitted to it and by the 12 gods if her and Shojo's authority extends to other lands to apprehend Roy et al then the laws of other lands extend to Azure City.

    As to her falling I have this to say: You can not both break a law and be lawful at the same time.

    If the Pope can have someone outside of the Vatican arrested then Vatican city best be extraditing his royal emminence if he commits a crime on foreign soil.

  20. - Top - End - #290
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    The Doctor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by zimri
    As to her falling I have this to say: You can not both break a law and be lawful at the same time.
    Obviously not. then again, being of lawful alignment does not necessarily mean that you CAN be lawful all the time - just that you try your best to be.

    The gods likely took no offense to Miko using detect evil while she wasn't supposed to, or it would not have worked.

    Btw, you mwy wonder whether the court order is legit in Azure city. It may apply Somewhere, but it need not apply Anywhere. I mean, it could apply Nowhere.
    Fickle thing, law.


  21. - Top - End - #291
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    rxmd's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bing! You're hypnotized!
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Doctor
    Fickle thing, law.
    Exactly. I especially love how in discussions about RPG law people take their particular understanding of the legal system of the particular country they live in and immediately assume that in every possible RPG setting it should be the same thing over. Perfect way to have a flamewar utterly devoid of point and purpose.

  22. - Top - End - #292
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rxmd

    Exactly. I especially love how in discussions about RPG law people take their particular understanding of the legal system of the particular country they live in and immediately assume that in every possible RPG setting it should be the same thing over. Perfect way to have a flamewar utterly devoid of point and purpose.
    It logically follows that if the land that Miko picked up the OOTS in respects the law and authority of Azure City that Azure City would have a reciprocating respect of the laws from other lands. Either that or Azure City is trying to enforce it's rules upon those it has no jurisdiction over which really doesn't sound terribly "lawful" to me.

  23. - Top - End - #293
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Silverblaze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiaman
    Best Belkar/Miko comic ever! So, he loves her and they're gonna get married and have halfhalflings... right? :D
    So that would be Quarterlings ?? ;)
    - It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. Avatar courtesy of Sneak -

  24. - Top - End - #294
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Adeptus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Turku, Finland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GeekDaddy
    Now THAT'S a great strip! And so totally in character with Belkar. It makes you wonder, does the cat get dissapointed when the mouse it's playing with stops moving?
    As a biologist this anthropomorphism really get's to me.

    Cats don't play with mice because they are cruel. A cat is a _very_ cautious predator. Rodents have a very nasty bite, and infection is a big killer in nature. A cat is a specialist in killing pray without getting hurt. An experienced cat will bat a mouse/rat a few times to disorient it, and then finish it off with a quick bite on the neck (a cat's canines are spaced exactly to fit between it's main pray specieses vertebra).

    A domestic cat doesn't get the training from mommy that it would need, and doesn't really know what to do with a mouse. The instinct makes a cat bat the small squeaky thing around, but it rarely knows how to kill the prey.

    [This has been an edjucational bulletin. Now, as a better informed human being you can dispense all dispense with the cat's are cruel/evil nonesense. Thank you.]

  25. - Top - End - #295
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Dark_Stalion's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Behind you.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Wow! I never knew that. Now I can laugh at all my friends.
    The management holds no responsibility for loss of sanity while reading this post.

    Kurt

  26. - Top - End - #296
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Adeptus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Turku, Finland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sylvius
    He thinks fighting and tormenting Miko is FUN. There's nothing in his behaviour that tells us he's not CE.
    <snip>
    Am I the only person who actually reads the whole thread?
    To go with Terry Prachett's cat knowledge, there is no point in a dead rival. He/she is just dead. The point is to beat your rival soundly, so that later, for all time, both of you know that you won and he/she was crushed.

    Belkar is not out to torture/torment Miko. That's not what he does. Belkar is out for _revenge_! That is very much his driving force. There is a difference.

  27. - Top - End - #297
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    For you people who are bothered by the grammer error, just imagine how much more annoying Miko probably found it.

  28. - Top - End - #298
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Adeptus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Turku, Finland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonofapreacherman

    Editorial P.S. By the way, saying "Oh man, it was TOTALLY worth lugging that thing around..." sounds less awkward than "Oh man, that was TOTALLY worth lugging that thing around..."

    Okay, now I'm done.
    I think you are dead wrong here. The meaning is very different, and I for one vastly prefer the original there. _That_ was totally worth (doing something)... the _that_ referst to the wanging, and is what made it worth luggin the lead sheet around.

    A bit quick with your criticism, aren't you?

  29. - Top - End - #299
    Giant in the Playground Administrator
     
    The Giant's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by malagigi
    Umm, it's always seemed to me that one could go through the core book and replace 'lawful' with 'consistent' and have it be just as accurate if not more so. I point this out to illustrate the fact that if you hold that your honor should not be broken and follow that dictate, then you are adhering to a 'law,' thereby making you 'lawful'.
    Exactly. Being Lawful in D&D means following a set of codes and rules—not obeying every law of every nation you ever find yourself in. As I've said before, when your paladin enters the evil Orc Warlord's swamp and starts killing orcs who are raiding a nearby human village, does he turn himself in to be tried by the Warlord for murder? No, because he doesn't recognize the Warlord's authority as a head of state. As far as he's concerned, that swamp belongs to the King whose nation it's in, regardless of what the orcs who live there think.

    Likewise, if a paladin has a strict code of honor, they can easily view that as more important than secular laws. They might agree to obey laws when possible, just because it's a nice thing to do, but in the end, their calling to serve the Power of Good may cause them to break those laws in an emergency (an emergency like a pint-size psychopath on the loose). If they continue to follow their core belief of "lawfulness"—their honor code—then the single breaking of a secular law will not cause them to change alignment. It is a nonlawful act, yes, but one does NOT change alignment from one nonlawful act. Only a consistent pattern of behavior will shift alignment, and contrary to popular belief, only a true switch to a nonlawful alignment will cause a paladin to fall. One evil act, and you fall; one nonlawful act, and you don't.

    On the other hand, I could post a comic with Miko standing still for 12 panels, and within 5 minutes there would be someone posting, "Miko should Fall for her inaction!" ::)
    Rich Burlew


    Now Available: 2023 OOTS Holiday Ornament plus a big pile of new t-shirt designs (that you can also get on mugs and stuff)!

    ~~You can also support The Order of the Stick and the GITP forum at Patreon.~~

  30. - Top - End - #300
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Silverblaze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark

    Default Re: OOTS #281 - The Discussion Thread

    Eh Don't know if this is to be considered a spoiler thing - if so then please moderate the text outta here asap...

    Would it not be worse than death for Miko to loose her paladinhood ? Belkar once stated that such was his goal and according to Yoda, anger leads to the dark side ;) In Belkar's view it might be much better not to kill Miko at all, but let her live on ín shame as a fallen paladin ;)
    - It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. Avatar courtesy of Sneak -

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •