2/28/2013 - Update on Thumb
12/31/2012 - There's a New Comic
12/12/2012 - The "Lost" Holiday Ornament (and Child's Play)
11/26/2012 - Leftover OOTS Swag on Sale (+Thumb Report)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 888 Dream Wedding
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com!
RSS Feeds: OOTS

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew
Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 



Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Gaming > Roleplaying Games > D&D 3e/3.5e/d20
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

D&D 3e/3.5e/d20 The forum for conversations specifically related to the rules and procedures of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition, 3.5 Edition, or any fantasy game using the d20 system or a variant thereof (commercially published or not).

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2013, 07:28 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3361
tuggyne
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 
Pondering turns of phrase
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renen View Post
Seems everyone either skipped or dont knwo the answer to my question. Ill post it just in case its the former.
It's probably not really simple enough; it's less of a RAW question and more of a "power selection" question.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
"Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
Homebrew Sigbox and Quotebox are overflow. RACSD and Top Ten fix and highlight some 3.5 rough spots. See also Gentlemen's Agreement.

Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid"
I often hop into threads for just one thing
Jezrald Ceikatar · ​CitP · ​Catgirl-Killers Society
tuggyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 08:54 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3362
Renen
Orc in the Playground
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

I just didnt feel it was significant enough to start a thread on... But i can if this thread isnt for this kinda questions.
Renen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:22 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3363
Preaplanes
Barbarian in the Playground
 
HalflingWizardGirl
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q1649: Are there any spells that can send physical missives to remote recipients?
__________________
Spoiler


Accidental Character Reference in D&D 3.5
Preaplanes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:28 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3364
Urpriest
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 
Stony Brook
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Preaplanes View Post
Q1649: Are there any spells that can send physical missives to remote recipients?
A 1649

Yes, this is a classic example.
__________________
Lord Raziere herd I like Blasphemy, so Urpriest Exalted as a Malefactor

Meet My Monstrous Guide to Monsters. Everything you absolutely need to know about Monsters and never thought you needed to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
One of the unwritten rules of Giantitp is that Urpriest is always right.
Trophy!
Spoiler
Urpriest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:29 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3365
douglas
Titan in the Playground
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 
Norcross, GA
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A1649

Teleport Object can do it, but you have to know where the recipient is. I am not aware of any Sending-style spell that delivers an object, but you could use a combination of Teleport Object with Scrying.
__________________
Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)

Archives:
Spoiler
douglas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 10:13 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3366
Crasical
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 
Texas
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q1650

http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/cl...sorcererWizard

Does a first level sorcerer or wizard who chooses this variant able to summon an animal companion, or does the '1/2 level' caveat result in the character being unable to summon anything for the first level?

Part B of above question: Can a wizard or sorcerer who has the above animal companion trade it for an animated object Urban Companion, or is 'stacking' variants and ACFs like this frowned upon?
__________________
I named and helped build the Pervirtuoso!
Ask me about Simon the Warblade!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waker View Post
[..] that post by Crasical...I can't find the words. Were I capable of emotion, I would cry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokuhara View Post
That's beautiful Crasical... Simply marvelous.
Crasical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 10:33 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3367
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1650

There is no companion available to a Druid of ½ level, so a Sorcerer/Wizard treated as a Druid with ½ level cannot have any animal companion.

Part B: There is no "stacking" issue with a Sorcerer/Wizard with an animal companion, because the Urban Druid option to have an animated object companion (Dragon # 317) is exactly that: a Druid option. A Sorcerer/Wizard variant which substitutes their familiar for an animal companion similar to a Druid's does not allow access to Druid-specific options for non-animal companions.
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 11:18 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3368
The Viscount
Barbarian in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q1651

Do Flyby Attack and Swim-By Attack provoke attacks of opportunity?
__________________
Kolyarut Avatar by Potatocubed.
"We all look for happiness, but without knowing where to find it, like drunkards who look for their house, knowing dimly that they have one." Voltaire
Quote:
Originally Posted by willpell View Post
Only playing Tier 1s is like only eating in five-star restaurants...even if you can afford such a diet, gorrammit sometimes I just want a cheeseburger and some frogurt. Why limit yourself?
Awards
The Viscount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:46 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3369
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1651 Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Improved Flyby Attack
Normal: Without this feat, a creature making an attack as part of a Flyby Attack maneuver provokes attacks of opportunity as normal from moving out of squares threatened by its target.
The normal rule is that movement out of a threatened square provokes attacks of opportunity, regardless of how that movement occurs.
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:34 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3370
Hyena
Dwarf in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q1652. Between two creatures there is a huge iron door, blocking the way. It has a small window, through which thet can see each other. Do they have line of sight?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fibinachi View Post
Hey, if the cost of that particular paladin in that particular scenario is falling...
... then I intend to so hard and so fast that the impact carries me and the cleric through the core of the planet and out the other side, streaking blood, grit, gore, law, evil, good and the precepts of my convictions far, far behind me. If being a rapidly moving comet soaring across the multiverse is the price one must pay to defeat a demigod of Evil, then that'll be the price.
Avatar by AddZabble
Hyena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:12 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3371
Flame of Anor
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 
Chicago
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyena View Post
Q1652. Between two creatures there is a huge iron door, blocking the way. It has a small window, through which thet can see each other. Do they have line of sight?
A 1652

If the window is at least 1 square foot, yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SRD
An otherwise solid barrier with a hole of at least 1 square foot through it does not block a power’s line of effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRD
A line of effect is...like line of sight for ranged weapons, except that it’s not blocked by fog, darkness, and other factors that limit normal sight.
__________________
R.I.P.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WampaX View Post
It ain't not over 'til the Rich Baker bellows.
avatar by me. Extended sig here.
Flame of Anor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:01 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3372
Metahuman1
Ogre in the Playground
 
SamuraiGirl
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1653: What book and page number can the parrying weapon property/ability be found on?

Q 1654: Is there any form of raned weapon that can be strapped to a characters arm and considered equipped with out getting in the way of using the hand on the arm the weapon is attached too that also accepts ammo? (Ammo meaning arrows, bullets, bolts, ext.)

If so, what book is it in and what page number?
__________________
Swordmaster in the playground.
Metahuman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:31 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3373
urandom
Pixie in the Playground
 
Planetar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1655:
When does a linked power (using linked power metapsionic feat from complete psionic) 'go off.' IE does it go off right before you take any actions, sometime during your turn, when you want. etc.
urandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 04:39 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3374
Lateral
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1656: Does making a Search check necessarily involve touching whatever you're searching?
Q 1656a: If so, are there rules for how one might search an object without touching it (taking a penalty, extra time, etc.)?
Q 1656b: If not, how close to the object searched do you have to be?

Q 1657: For NPCs with things like a Paladin Mount or an animal companion, does the animal's CR also contribute to the EL, or is it included in the CR of the NPC (as with summons)?
__________________
That whale is going to die, and it's Fullbladder's fault.
Lateral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 04:44 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3375
tuggyne
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 
Pondering turns of phrase
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A1653 partial Expanded Psionics Handbook.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
"Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
Homebrew Sigbox and Quotebox are overflow. RACSD and Top Ten fix and highlight some 3.5 rough spots. See also Gentlemen's Agreement.

Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid"
I often hop into threads for just one thing
Jezrald Ceikatar · ​CitP · ​Catgirl-Killers Society
tuggyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:05 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3376
Urpriest
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 
Stony Brook
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lateral View Post
Q 1656: Does making a Search check necessarily involve touching whatever you're searching?
Q 1656a: If so, are there rules for how one might search an object without touching it (taking a penalty, extra time, etc.)?
Q 1656b: If not, how close to the object searched do you have to be?

Q 1657: For NPCs with things like a Paladin Mount or an animal companion, does the animal's CR also contribute to the EL, or is it included in the CR of the NPC (as with summons)?
A 1657:

It is included in the CR of the NPC. Note that there are no rules dictating the CR modifications from being an animal companion or paladin's mount, so there would be no other way to handle the situation anyway.
__________________
Lord Raziere herd I like Blasphemy, so Urpriest Exalted as a Malefactor

Meet My Monstrous Guide to Monsters. Everything you absolutely need to know about Monsters and never thought you needed to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
One of the unwritten rules of Giantitp is that Urpriest is always right.
Trophy!
Spoiler
Urpriest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:07 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3377
Andezzar
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1656

No:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRD
You generally must be within 10 feet of the object or surface to be searched.
Andezzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 06:20 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3378
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1653 [correction]

The latest version of the Parrying weapon enhancement is in Magic Item Compendium on page 40. It's been substantially changed since Expanded Psionics Handbook.
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:13 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3379
Lateral
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1658: Say a character has a 5-foot speed. They're wearing full plate, which is not only heavy armor, but also a heavy load. Does their move speed stay at five feet? What happens if they try to run?
__________________
That whale is going to die, and it's Fullbladder's fault.
Lateral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:41 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3380
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1658 Ask your DM.

Lacking armor speed tables going as low as 5' base speed, a determination will be up to your individual DM. If it helps, I've determined a useful formula that reproduces the table entries as far as they go:
reduced speed = base speed x .69, rounded to nearest 5'
Using that formula your speed would still be 5'. You would Run (the full-round action) at 3 times this speed, or 15', when wearing heavy armor. (The Run feat would increase this to 4 times base speed, or 20', when wearing heavy armor.) You would not be able to take 5' steps.
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:13 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3381
Metahuman1
Ogre in the Playground
 
SamuraiGirl
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1659:

Is there a listed Item that would funtion as a tactical sling for a crossbow, allowing the user to be holding the crossbow and then drop it and not actually loose or risk loosing the crossbow?

If not, what would the process be to create such a mundane device?
__________________
Swordmaster in the playground.
Metahuman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:20 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3382
Andezzar
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1659

I'm pretty sure that's "ask your DM" territory.

Q 1660

A character with at least one natural attack and a reach weapon is entitled to an AoO against a creature within its natural reach.

a) Can this attack come from a claw attack or another attack that comes from a limb that wields the weapon?

b) Does the AoO suffer the -5 penalty for being a secondary natural attack?

Q 1661

Are there LA reducing templates? Where can I find them?

Q 1662

Is there a limit on how many inherited templates you can stack?

Q 1663

Where can I find Half-fiend templates for different parent fiends

Q 1664

Is there a definition for fiend? Are fiendish creatures fiends?

Last edited by Andezzar : Today at 01:21 AM.
Andezzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:46 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3383
Jon_Dahl
Orc in the Playground
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 
Sad place
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1665

Secret Chest
Can anyone recall the chest who has the replica and has prepared the spell, or is the original caster of the spell the only one who can recall the chest (using the replica, of course)?
__________________
Spoiler
Jon_Dahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:17 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3384
Andezzar
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1666

If you get a fly speed from different sources, do you have to choose one or can you combine the two? Example: Someone casts Fly on an adult red dragon. Does the dragon have to choose between moving at 150 ft (poor maneuverability) and 60 ft (good maneuverability) or can it combine the two for 150 ft (good maneuverability)

Q 1667

Are there any spells that increase maneuverability?

[edit]A 1667

Yes: (Greater) Wings of Air in the SpC. It is limited to winged flight though.[/Edit]

Q 1668

Do improvements to maneuverability from different sources stack?

Last edited by Andezzar : Today at 02:30 AM.
Andezzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 03:42 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3385
Failed Phantasm
Orc in the Playground
 
PaladinGuy
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 
GMT -8:00
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1663

This web enhancement has rules for adjusting the Half-Fiend template to make creatures with specific fiendish parentage.
__________________
Current Games:
Spoiler
Failed Phantasm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 06:39 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3386
HurinTheCursed
Halfling in the Playground
 
GnomeWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 
Paris
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1660 a
Your main attack comes from the weapon but you can't make an AoO if you don't threaten the square. Then you should use the weapon if it threatens the square, a natural weapon otherwise that threatens it otherwise.

A 1662
IIRC, you can add as many as you want by RAW even if IMO it doesn't really make sense and seems really cheesy.

A 1666
You could choose either one depending on your need, using and then the other if you want with a two moves round but you cannot "combine" them.

A 1667
There's Mastery of the Sky and Aerial Alacrity from RotW, for others your best chance is there

A 1668
Depends on the wording of the spell / feat...

Q 1669
The bearer and allies within 30' of the Standard of heroism gain +2 morale bonus on attack rolls, saves and skill checks. Does it apply to ability checks ?

Q 1670
What is the minimum distance to move if you jump 10' (with no obstacle objective, just a minimum distance) ? Do you count from the middle of a case to the middle of a case (Ox|X|xD) or do you have to add one case so that it is from border to border (O|X|X|D) ? O for origin, D for destination
__________________
Currently playing:
- Dastrun "raging bulldozer" es Entragarth
- Dolores the deceiver, beguiler of Queen Geleeda

Last edited by HurinTheCursed : Today at 06:57 AM. Reason: url format
HurinTheCursed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 07:25 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3387
mattie_p
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 
<<Undetected>>
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andezzar View Post
Q 1661

Are there LA reducing templates? Where can I find them?
A 1661: The only one I am aware of is Incarnate Construct, from Savage Species. 3.0 material, so may require minor adjustments.

Quote:
Q 1664

Is there a definition for fiend? Are fiendish creatures fiends?
A 1664: Apparently not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urpriest View Post
Unfortunately there isn't a good definition of fiend.
Are fiendish creatures fiends? Ask your DM. Personally I'd say no, as creature type is not outsider, but absent a binding definition every dm must make that choice for themself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon_Dahl View Post
Q 1665

Secret Chest
Can anyone recall the chest who has the replica and has prepared the spell, or is the original caster of the spell the only one who can recall the chest (using the replica, of course)?
A 1665: Only the caster.

From the spell description,
Quote:
Once the chest is hidden, you can retrieve it by concentrating (a standard action), and it appears next to you...

If the miniature of the chest is lost or destroyed, there is no way, not even with a wish spell, that the large chest can be summoned back
If the caster cannot summon the chest back with a wish, the finder of the "lost" miniature cannot summon it back either.

A 1669: No. The item (found in CW) tells you exactly what you get. An ability check is not an attack, save, or skill check.

A 1670: It depends. In situations where it would be important to jump over two complete squares (such as over a 10-foot pit or ravine), presumably you are able to completely clear the two squares (although you should probably jump 11' in that situation). If you are merely attempting to jump 10 feet for no mechanical reason, you can start in the middle of one square, clear one complete square and land in the middle of the third square, or clear two complete squares, at your discretion.
__________________
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium. Adopt an Avatar today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazyan View Post
Nah, the material component of that spell is a Mindraped Ice Assassin of a Rudimentary Intelligence Shadesteel Golem with a Craft Contingent Shapechange on it. Not worth the trouble.
Spoiler

Last edited by mattie_p : Today at 08:17 AM.
mattie_p is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:29 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3388
HurinTheCursed
Halfling in the Playground
 
GnomeWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 
Paris
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

Q 1670 clarification
Thanks for your answer Mattie, I wasn't specific enough indeed.
By RAW, if a PC attemps to jump over a 10' pit, would the DC be 10 or 15 with a running start ?
If you try to use a leap attack charge, what is the minimum total distance to clear with and without running start ?
__________________
Currently playing:
- Dastrun "raging bulldozer" es Entragarth
- Dolores the deceiver, beguiler of Queen Geleeda
HurinTheCursed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:56 AM   Top  -  End  -  #3389
mattie_p
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 
<<Undetected>>
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

A 1670 (cont): If the precise distance matters, the DM will set the precise distance and therefore the DC for the skill check. This is dictated way back on page 5 of the PHB, under Core Mechanic:

Quote:
To determine if your character succeeds at a task (such as attacking a monster or using a skill), you do this:
  • Roll a d20.
  • Add any relevant modifiers.
  • Compare the result to a target number.
If the result equals or exceeds the target number (set by the DM or given in the rules), your character succeeds. If the result is lower than the target number, you fail.
Any pit or ravine not covered in the rules (of which I don't believe there are any, except in adventure modules) would have the Jump DC set by the DM. So the base DC is the number of feet you must jump in order to clear the obstacle. This DC is doubled if you do not have a running start (or something that qualifies as a running start). The exact distance isn't really material, except to the DM. The DC is, and is the sole purview of the DM.

Let's say the DM determines a DC of 10 to clear the pit. Your jump check would have to equal or exceed 10 in order to clear the pit with a running start, or 20 without a running start.

Leap attack (C. Adv.) specifies you must cover at least 10 feet of distance, so the jump DC to qualify for leap attack is 10 (or 20 without a running start).
__________________
Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium. Adopt an Avatar today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazyan View Post
Nah, the material component of that spell is a Mindraped Ice Assassin of a Rudimentary Intelligence Shadesteel Golem with a Craft Contingent Shapechange on it. Not worth the trouble.
Spoiler
mattie_p is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.