Results 121 to 128 of 128
-
2011-09-30, 10:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
Last edited by FujinAkari; 2011-09-30 at 10:03 AM.
Official Incense Aroma Specialist for the Vaarsuvius Fan Club!
English isn't my primary language, so please let me know if something I'm saying doesn't make sense!Continuation of ThePhantasm's awesometacular post
-
2011-09-30, 12:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Gender
-
2011-09-30, 01:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
Why isn't Amun-Zora (aka Future Mrs. Tarquin #10) mentioned in the OP?That's how I understand it as well:
-Nale was the only villain initially intended to be recurring (based on the commentary); this is settled by #15 (goat prophecy).
-The Gate plot and whether Dorukan was a person or something else developed around the time of #71.
-The MitD's identity is settled by #100 (commentary).
-Last minute changes to the Order of the Scribble were made right before #196 (above link).
-
2011-09-30, 04:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
Bwuh-huh?
Rich further clarifies and fleshes out the plot -every- strip which comes out.-
The assertion here was that Trigak's 'significant other' was a line placed in the comic to serve as a Chekov's Gun, but Rich later abandoned that plotline. It is an assertion entirely lacking of supporting evidence and I'm really not sure how noting that Rich would continue to refine the plot over the next eight-hundred strips addresses the issue :P
The question is not whether Rich added and refined the plot, the question is whether he wholesale abandoned entire arcs which he had originally intended.Official Incense Aroma Specialist for the Vaarsuvius Fan Club!
English isn't my primary language, so please let me know if something I'm saying doesn't make sense!Continuation of ThePhantasm's awesometacular post
-
2011-10-04, 03:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
In the first place, it was not an "assertion" but a speculation, and clearly stated as such.
In the second place, it may not have any direct evidence to support the speculation, but it does fit closely to what is known of the development of ideas.
In the third place, I do not speculate that the plot was "abandoned" but that it was improved before he used it. To clarify: my speculation is that he had vague plans for a storyline where Trigak's mate returns to seek revenge on Belkar. The black dragon plot is the same idea, but improved.
And that is still speculation, not an assertion..
-.____________________
./___________________()-------Ron Miel
|...___________________--------sits down
|..| |_________________()-------and starts
|..|/__________________--------singing
| ___________________()-------about gold
.
-
2012-02-18, 10:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Sharangar's Revenge
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
I think we can delete these two. Red Cloak has Xykon's Phylactery, and I think it's safe to say that Tsukiko will NOT be helping Xykon with the ritual...
Edit: Oops! I didn't realize there was a "II" version of this thread. Oh well.Last edited by Lord Torath; 2012-02-18 at 11:46 PM.
-
2012-02-20, 08:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- Misery USA
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
How about this one guys, Given that the Starshine's and Draketooth's are both redhaired and grossly untrustful of others, could they be one in the same family? Specifically the Starshines being a non-magic using branch.
Wizard's First Rule: People will believe anything, either because they want it to be true, or they are afraid it is true.
-
2012-02-20, 10:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Gender
Re: Unresolved plot point collection thread
It's been 24 hours and no mods. The Necromancers rule the thread! Nothing can stop our blight upon the world!
If you want to post, follow my sig.