Results 271 to 297 of 297
Thread: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
-
2018-11-13, 06:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
On the one hand, I agree with this (RAW always has to be a bit flexible). It's even worse with Planar Binding because, in the cylinder model, a Pit Fiend could presumably make a quick Knowledge (The Planes) check, then Greater Teleport some ridiculous distance straight up (enough to know it'll be in clear sky), and then just spend the next 14,400 rounds * caster level greater teleporting to random locations up or down the relevant plane, just to avoid having to make a deal.
On the other hand, part of the point of this thread is to establish RAW mechanics for Planar Binding, so that it is less subject to DM fiat (or at least so the DM and players both know what to expect in the absence of any house rules).
-
2018-11-13, 07:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
As an aside, if Dragon Magazine is allowed in anyone's games, you should absolutely check out Dragon #336, which has a whole host of spells that improve Planar Binding. One spell in particular (Exaction) allows you to make varying degrees of sacrifice to gain a small bonus on your Charisma check and, more importantly, a creature's willing service to the full extent of your instructions if you succeed on the check. The smallest sacrifice is 50gp / HD of the creature, which seems like a small price to pay for a minion for one day per caster level (a Pit Fiend would only be 900gp!).
-
2018-11-13, 11:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Oh, hey, people actually responded to a thing that I said!
I, personally, don't think that coercing somebody to perform a Good act is in and of itself a Good act, on the simple basis because the whole concept is founded in coercion (whether by threat of force or outright mind-control, the specifics are mostly irrelevant) and that by itself is not a Good thing to do. I don't think that Miko coercing the Order into following her to Azure City, and essentially browbeating half of them into fighting off an ogre band along the way, would absolutely qualify as Good acts in-universe even though taken out of context (legitimate civil authority arrests suspected criminals for a pending trial, then makes use of resources at hand to stop criminal group threatening civilians) they certainly could be seen as such.
But that's a debate full of subjective opinions on the nature of alignment, not to mention framed through Order of the Stick, and this isn't a thread or a subforum for any of those descriptors. It's not a thread I'd personally want to start, either, if the current condition of this one is anything to go by.Last edited by ElFi; 2018-11-13 at 11:34 PM.
My Homebrew
Healer: Pathfinder remake of the 3.5 class of the same name. Light, restoration, and more positive energy effects than you can shake a cleric at.
-
2018-11-14, 11:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
The thing is that freedom of action as opposed to coerced action isn't a matter for Good and Evil in D&D. At least not in 3.5. It's a matter for Law and Chaos. If you are forcing somebody to do something good, I would argue that generally speaking that's Good. At least as far as D&D goes. I mean we have a spell that is not only good but Exalted that involves forcing a creature to change completely and irrevocably. Acting counter to freedom isn't acting counter to Goodness in D&D. And in many other philosophies.
Well we have some objective things present in that sort of discussion, and those tend to suggest that coercing somebody is Lawful, but not necessarily Good or Evil, depending on the exact nature of the coercive acts taking place.My Avatar is Glimtwizzle, a Gnomish Fighter/Illusionist by Cuthalion.
-
2018-11-14, 11:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Last edited by fallensavior; 2018-11-14 at 11:38 AM.
"Ishkhaqwi ai durugnul!"
- FallenSavior
-
2018-11-15, 02:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Of course, if you have Improved Initative, Primal Instinct and Nerveskitter, going first probably isn't going to be a problem.
I have a few questions for someone with more experience using these spells. I have a sorcerer with the Celestial bloodline feat printed in Dragon Compendium, which disallows me from casting Evil spells. It also gives me Magic Circle against Evil for free.
So if I get Planar Binding at a later level, if I desire to capture an Efreeti for the 3 wishes they can grant once per day, I'd have to cast that free MCaE spell, but can I still summon an Efreeti? They are Lawful Evil, but do not have the Evil subtype, only the Fire subtype, so is that still open? Since they know Plane shift, I assume I still need to cast Dimension Anchor, would a scroll work as well as anything? Is it better for a sorcerer to cast Planar binding from a scroll rather than learning the spell, given the limitations?
-
2018-11-15, 02:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
That example was a real life example. But if someone thought that a cage was the magical example instead of magic circle then that person is half assing the discussion and I don't want to waste effort talking with a half asser.
You can't call an efreeti. "When you use a calling spell to call an air, chaotic, earth, evil, fire, good, lawful, or water creature, it is a spell of that type. " Nothing about subtypes. Efreeti is a lawful evil creature so the spell becomes a lawful and evil spell. A scroll of dimensional anchor would work. Using a scroll of planar binding is unadvisable since because of the will save you're going to need to cast it several times and a scroll's save dc is the bare minimum possible.
If you want a free efreeti i'd suggest you go the simulacrum route by buying a scroll of simulacrum.
-
2018-11-15, 03:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Well, hold on a second. Efreeti lack alignment subtypes, so yes, while you could call they an "evil creature", that doesn't exclude the possibility of summoning an efreeti who doesn't hold an evil alignment, thanks to the 99% rule. In fact, if you are incapable of casting evil spells, by this ruling, you would ALWAYS get a non-evil efreeti (unless they don't exist by the DM's ruling). It would be the same as calling tieflings evil creatures, you can certainly get non-evil tieflings.
However, consider it from another angle: Air, earth, fire and water are all impossible to denote by any other means beside subtype. Would it not therefore be prudent to expect the same result from alignments? Alternatively, you give people unable to cast evil spells a uniquely strong ability to summon non-evil versions of creatures like efreeti using some kind of celestial filter I guess?World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2018-11-15, 03:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
It was my understanding that you can only call a typical creature or a named creature. An unusual chaotic good efreeti is not typical and you wouldn't know the name of one so you can't call it. So no advanced hd creature, no aasimar with class levels, MM entry exclusive unless it's a unique being and you know its name.
I guess it's up to a DM whether a lawful evil creature without the lawful or evil subtypes is a "lawful evil creature." Just because all air creatures have the air subtype does not mean all lawful evil creatures have the lawful evil subtype imo. And again the text does not specify subtype.Last edited by RoboEmperor; 2018-11-15 at 03:27 AM.
-
2018-11-15, 04:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
I don't see anywhere that it says the creature is typical for it's kind in all way, the way other spells denote that. The creature you call could well be advanced (within the limits of the spell of course, lesser planar binding cannot call forth a 12HD succubus for example), have the elite array, have class levels and so on. The person doing the calling has no control over this though. They cannot say "I wish to summon a tiefling with 6 levels in sorcerer" they can only say "I wish to summon a tiefling" or "I wish to summon this specific tiefling who I can refer to by their proper name".
As both a DM and a player, I've both allowed and been allowed to even summon templated creatures, like a half celestial pegasus. After all, the spell says "The kind of creature to be bound must be known and stated." A half celestial pegasus is a kind of creature, it is known to exist, and is stated by the caster. No other criteria necessary.World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2018-11-15, 04:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Siebenwind
-
2018-11-15, 04:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Clicking the link on the SRD also takes you to the Evil subtype for what it is worth, and the spell specifices creature, not alignment.
-
2018-11-15, 04:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Last edited by Crake; 2018-11-15 at 04:37 AM.
World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2018-11-15, 05:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
If anything, it's an indicator that there is some through-thought on the subject. It would regardless have been easy for the designers of D&D to have attached the Evil subtype to Efreeti, if they were intended for it to matter for the purposes of summoning. Context it is put into matters and as you said, Evil, good, chaotic and lawful being listed alongside water, air, earth and fire hints heavily at subtypes mattering, not the given alignment of the subject.
But then again, I am asking because I am not sure if I am interpreting it correctly. Worse case the DM could shut me down anyway, at which point I guess I'd have to summon a djinni?
-
2018-11-15, 05:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
These cases are 100% DM's call. If I was your DM i'd shut you down, if Crake was your DM he'd enable your free wishes (though he'll probably completely screw you over with them as he should!). I personally think a lawful evil creature is a lawful evil creature so the spell would become lawful and evil but if the DM says that part of the spell text is exclusively about subtypes then who am I to argue? More power for me. But in my experience, it's always best to go with the worst possible interpretation to not let the DM feel iffy, or myself even. And if Crake was my DM I'd still play as if my ruling is correct because I don't want to feel "iffy"
I mean, sure, if your DM allows, and I think SOME templates are fair game, like a NORMAL template and not a 100 non-hd-increasing-template stacked creature, but I claim that a "12hd succubus" is not a kind of creature like "succubus." I mean sure you can argue that each hit die of succubus is its own "kind" despite all this using meta-terminology but all this is not specifically spelled out, or even mentioned, so I feel uncomfortable using it this way.
I will say there is significantly more than enough leeway for a DM to rule it your way or my way without either being called house rules.Last edited by RoboEmperor; 2018-11-15 at 05:50 AM.
-
2018-11-15, 05:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Norway
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Cool! Thanks for the input guys, you are the best.
-
2018-11-15, 10:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
So, you try to summon a "Human" via a "Summon Human" spell.
You don't get to specify whether this human has 20 levels in Programmer, or is a level 2 Expert. But, in summoning a Human, they might well have professional skills, because that's something humans can have.
I have the "Alternate Reproductive Summoner" prestige class, and cannot summon free births. Humans are free births by default. But Clone Troopers and other proper life forms exist which are still Human without being disgusting free births. So I can summon one of those. I cannot choose which I summon. And, technically, a normal, less picky Summoner could summon a proper clone "by accident", too.
At least, that's my take on how summoning works. No RAW was harmed or used in any way in the creation of this post.
-
2018-11-15, 06:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Originally Posted by Monster Manual IV p.54Originally Posted by Monster Manual IV p.194
Elementals are somewhat more attractive now.Last edited by RoboEmperor; 2018-11-15 at 08:31 PM.
-
2018-11-15, 08:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
-
2018-11-15, 08:32 PM (ISO 8601)
-
2018-11-16, 10:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Now, interesting question: IF gogogome would withhold his approval should RoboEmperor fail to follow this suggestion, and RoboEmperor valued that approval, did gogogome enslave RoboEmperor?
If not, at what point would gogogome's offer of payment and/or RoboEmperor's level of craving for the offered payment make it slavery?
The real difference between planar binding and planar ally in terms of slavery or not is that planar binding offers the option, while planar ally does not. It's generally assumed, given the option to enslave rather than achieve a willing cooperation, that casters will take the "enslave it to my will" option, but it's not required.
-
2018-11-17, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
I mean, you could try, but just because a creature like that COULD exist, doesn't mean it DOES.
I agree with you there. If you summoned a succubus with lesser planar binding, you would always get a 6HD succubus, if you summoned a succubus with regular, or greater planar binding, you might get an advanced succubus (it's not guaranteed), either advanced by class, or by HD. Hell, you may well even get a templated succubus, as a templated succubus is still a succubus.
If I gave the impression this was how I intended for it all to work, I'm sorry for the miscommunication, but that's not at all how I would run it. You can't say "I want a 12HD succubus", or "I want a 9HD succubus", you can simply say "I want a succubus", and depending on the power of the spell you're using, you'll get something that fits into the HD requirements of what you're summoning. Personally, as 99% of humans are level 1 commoners, 99% of succubi are unadvanced monsters, so the likelihood of actually getting an advanced succubus is exceedingly small with planar binding. With planar ally on the other hand, the deity picks the creature, it's not entirely random. If you're using regular planar ally, and the best minion for the job is a succubus, why NOT send an advanced succubus.
As I said, I don't feel it works that way, though as you demonstrated later in the thread, there is definitely precedence for advanced creatures being summonable. I feel like, for the most part, calling advanced creatures is usually done by name, not by chance.World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2018-11-18, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Berlin
- Gender
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
There must already be a name for that certain kind of fallacy around, right?
The name of the game is "Specific beats general", but only because the underlying framework of d20 tries to use and re-use a lot of "common rules", instead of "discreet rules". Ex: Handling a lot of things via shared rules, like conditions and such.
That said, when one discreet rules element comes included with a specific exception, that doesn't make that one exception into a genreal rule.
-
2018-11-18, 08:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
World of Madius wiki - My personal campaign setting, including my homebrew Optional Gestalt/LA rules.
The new Quick Vestige List
-
2019-01-14, 09:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: Planar Binding is SLAVERY
Since the thread's reasonably recent, I figured I might drop some thoughts on this.
1: By the rules in PHB, Planar Binding definitely allows you to coerce a creature into doing what you want via the Charisma check (barring "impossible demands or unreasonable commands"), or to simply outright murder it/mind-control it after calling it up. It doesn't provide rules for what happens if you threaten it with death unless it agrees to service. One valid ruling, IMO, would be that, since you didn't win the Charisma check, the creature is not actually compelled (i.e. this ensues).
2: The rules in Fiendish Codex II clearly state that the Charisma check for Planar Binding a devil automatically fails if the modifiers don't stack up right. While this isn't completely beyond belief (it could be a Hells-wide collective bargaining agreement, to discourage mortals from enslaving them), it is definitely a reverse-course from the PHB. To be perfectly honest, I don't like Fiendish Codex II very much, because it has a much larger reverse-course in it as well - rules that send a significant proportion of LG, LN, NE and CE souls to the Nine Hells, despite this absolutely crapping on all the established lore. As such, I'd personally be hesitant to apply some of its changes in a game I was DMing, including this one.
3: PHB: "The creature might later seek revenge." This is a very vague sentence allowing the DM to enforce storyline consequences for use - and, more particularly, abuse - of Planar Binding. The obvious solution to this is to simply murder the creature before it goes back, but there are a few caveats here:
a) if you're actually using the Charisma check to control the creature, it's freed and returned the instant it informs you of its success. You will either have to kill it before it completes its task, or use divination to figure out when it's succeeded and arrange some method of killing it before it can report back. Bit of a headache either way.
b) again if you're actually using the Charisma check, there is the issue that "serve me and then I'll murder you" is kind of the definition of an "unreasonable command" and as such you'll have to deceive the creature in some fashion. This would involve a Bluff vs. Sense Motive opposed check.
c) while calling and then killing an outsider doesn't leave someone pissed off at you, it does create a mysterious disappearance, and the D&D universe is one where divination magic exists (as does True Resurrection). Moreover, you are probably not the first person to try this kind of stunt. As such, I would imagine that the lawful planes would keep records of this sort of thing in their enormous bureaucracies, and any relatively-orderly plane would have a small section of their police force dedicated to investigating these kind of transplanar serial killers. I'm not saying it'd be worth their while to stop you after one or two incidents like this, but if you made a habit of it as a player I'd feel perfectly justified as DM in sending an Overwhelming-rated kill squad after you (the DMG does recommend 5% of encounters be beyond the PCs' capabilities). There are some planar denizens which are relatively unlikely to do this - Limbo's slaadi and the Abyss' demons being the type examples - but even then you'll get unlucky eventually. Or a kolyarut could come after you for breaking your bargains, because that's a thing in D&D (cf: Obligatum VII from Elder Evils, who was dispatched to free Pandorym after its summoners betrayed, mutilated and imprisoned it).
4: Something to remember from the horse's mouth.
DMG p.6: "Good players will always recognize that you have ultimate authority over the game mechanics, even superseding something in a rulebook. Good DMs know not to change or overturn a published rule without a good, logical justification so the players don't rebel."
This might just be me, but "I'm not really interested in running a whole subplot about you being punished for your hubris, but I don't want to hand you the carte blanche that Planar Binding is absent consequences" is a pretty logical justification for houseruling/banning PB from where I sit.
-
2019-01-14, 10:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- Char
-
2019-01-14, 11:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Gender