Wait a minute, here. The ALF is fairly strong, and against a single country, yes, it might be a threat. But the ALF is against a CONTINENT, which has superior technology, superior numbers, superior defenses, and superior morale. Superior in every way. It is quite easy for at least a few to joke about that.
And Hezbollah are practically against the whole world, we don't make jokes about them just because they're not as superior.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemming
I'm too young to die! Or be turned into shade spawn I guess...
...The tower near Mordor? Do you mean the time when Frodo was paralyzed by Shelob and brought to the guard tower, and the Sam had to go rescue him? Cause that happened in the book.
Nah, when Faramir takes them to a city. The tower you're thinking of is in Mordor.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gremlin
Wait a minute, here. The ALF is fairly strong, and against a single country, yes, it might be a threat. But the ALF is against a CONTINENT, which has superior technology, superior numbers, superior defenses, and superior morale. Superior in every way. It is quite easy for at least a few to joke about that.
Not a continent, all of know Avbaroy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonAngel
HA! We have the reaper, a few tieflings, guinoids, pikalites, a butt load of monsters, and a bunch of epic spell casters. Not to mention the other epic level classes, like 3S. And my widdle Ami will get her miniature otter army to gnaw their eyes out. *proud of Ami*
You don't have pikalites, these are on the UNA's side. Besides, no amount of physical/magical/whatever power is going to save you from ordnance bombs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
Epic level here.
Not to mention our awesome army and the Citidel. We might be smaller but we're very advanced.
That's a bit of an understatement...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of gray
That's racial. Gray's stop maturing at age... stop growing. And it's a magic motorcycle. Not really.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
Epic level here.
Not to mention our awesome army and the Citidel. We might be smaller but we're very advanced.
If you're talking about the argument:
We have no 'awesome army'. We have a bunch of ragtag resisters, many of whom don't get along. We are not organized, we are not a unit, we are just a bunch of smaller groups technically against the same side.
We are not advanced, either. We have some decent technology, from the Dettas, and a bit of Schizotec stuff. The UNA has Sovice stuff, Schizotec stuff, Pikalite stuff, Salmonville stuff, and Lockutas stuff. Not to mention stuff from the dwarves, elves, orcs, and all those groups.
Ow.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mask
How do they deal with overpopulation ?
Most of them in the past have been sold into slavery or killed. History has not been kind to Grays. They stop aging at that age, but aren't immortal. They die at age 999 precisely. In addition, most grays tend to... mate with other races. The offspring of Gray usually resemble their non-gray parent more, as the genes of grays aren't very dominant.
__________________
If you are in a game with me feel free to add me on MSN or AIM. Contact Info is on my profile.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gremlin
No, it was more of a city. They were brought there unwillingly by Faramir, then attacked by Nazgul.
They went to Henneth Annûn, but I think you're thinking of Osgiliath. They decided that Frodo and Sam needed more opposition in their quest, primarily to delay then, and make the film flow better. David Wenham (who played Faramir) said that the book version was "dramatically dead"
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of gray
Most of them in the past have been sold into slavery or killed. History has not been kind to Grays. They stop aging at that age, but aren't immortal. They die at age 999 precisely. In addition, most grays tend to... mate with other races. The offspring of Gray usually resemble their non-gray parent more, as the genes of grays aren't very dominant.
How did they originally develop their pseudo-immortality ? I'd wager it's the result of some kind of genetic/magical manipulation, since such a thing does not happen like that in nature.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Precisely MM. The same way they obtained their poison and acid resistance. Genetic or magic manipulation at the hands of other races. Slaves and test subjects for a while, remember.
__________________
If you are in a game with me feel free to add me on MSN or AIM. Contact Info is on my profile.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keris Rain
They went to Henneth Annûn, but I think you're thinking of Osgiliath. They decided that Frodo and Sam needed more opposition in their quest, primarily to delay then, and make the film flow better. David Wenham (who played Faramir) said that the book version was "dramatically dead"
Yeah, it was almost as lame as the whole thing with Frodo leaving Sam. It wasn't even that good a scene, either. The worst crime, however, of the movies was Legolas. He is invincible. He never even got a scratch, because he was their 'awesome super smart pretty boy'. Orlando Bloom ruined that movie. They should have just sent him up against Sauron, because he was unhurtable. He could just jump up to the top of the tower. HE WAS THE DUMBEST THING EVER TO HAPPEN TO THE MOVIES!!!
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gremlin
If you're talking about the argument:
We have no 'awesome army'. We have a bunch of ragtag resisters, many of whom don't get along. We are not organized, we are not a unit, we are just a bunch of smaller groups technically against the same side.
We are not advanced, either. We have some decent technology, from the Dettas, and a bit of Schizotec stuff. The UNA has Sovice stuff, Schizotec stuff, Pikalite stuff, Salmonville stuff, and Lockutas stuff. Not to mention stuff from the dwarves, elves, orcs, and all those groups.
Ow.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinisterPenguin
I'm not sure which side Sinister Penguin should be on in Future Imperfect. Would the ALF or the UNA be more suitable for an evil character?
That would be ALF. We have plenty of criminals (and also evil guys) plus psychopath's (John Garde's wolf form will end at the resistance at some point and Nameless ain't much better)
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
@CrimsonAngel: I don't get it. You killed him.. with a herd of giant caterpillars?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gremlin
HE WAS THE DUMBEST THING EVER TO HAPPEN TO THE MOVIES!!!
Nah, there were dumber things. Like omitting Bombadil, or waiting until the Paths of the Dead to give Arúndil to Aragorn. He's meant to get the flag then, not the sword!
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keveak
That would be ALF. We have plenty of criminals (and also evil guys) plus psychopath's (John Garde's wolf form will end at the resistance at some point and Nameless ain't much better)
Nameless is true neutral, not evil.
...
Though it would be good for UNA properganda...
"ALF- The bring nothing but Death" or "ALF- They have Death on their side".
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nameless
Actually that's ALF's army.
I've only come up with some basic information at the moment. Everyone is welcomed to contribute of course.
Ummm...where the hell would they come from, if you don't mind me asking? The ALF is a group of evil, rather insane terrorists, home to wicked criminals like Igon Minoblendy and that mage guy who has been known to help the mass-murderer Vampire What's-His-Name! Why would they help? The ALF can't even pay!
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinisterPenguin
I'm not sure which side Sinister Penguin should be on in Future Imperfect. Would the ALF or the UNA be more suitable for an evil character?
The ALF, because the UNA is an organisation dedicated to peace, justice and good quality of life, at least on the outside. And the ALF provides protection from law to its members, and you have more freedom to do your illegal actions.
Re: Avatar Battle Royale Discussion Thread XIX: To FAIL, or not to FAIL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gremlin
Ummm...where the hell would they come from, if you don't mind me asking? The ALF is a group of evil, rather insane terrorists, home to wicked criminals like Igon Minoblendy and that mage guy who has been known to help the mass-murderer Vampire What's-His-Name! Why would they help? The ALF can't even pay!
ALF are only evil in the UNA's eyes. Good and evil are only concepts in which everyone interprets their own way.
The ALF are basically a group of people who don't agree with the UNA's plans, Igon isn’t Evil, Nameless isn’t evil.
The army are other’s much like the main members of the ALF who also disagree with the UNA's plans, so they joined the ALF and got a nice shiny uniform.
Quote:
And doesn't ALF having an army sort of go against the whole ragtag underground resistance thing?
It's only a small army, I thought it would make things more interesting if the ALF had one.