2/28/2013 - Update on Thumb
12/31/2012 - There's a New Comic
12/12/2012 - The "Lost" Holiday Ornament (and Child's Play)
11/26/2012 - Leftover OOTS Swag on Sale (+Thumb Report)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 889 Get Real
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com!
RSS Feeds: OOTS

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew
Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 



Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Gaming > Homebrew Design
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

Homebrew Design Roll up your sleeves and get working: there's lots of homebrewin' to be done! Post your custom creation for critiques or review those of your peers.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2010, 09:31 AM   Top  -  End  -  #1
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Warlock 2.0

I attempted to re-write the Hellfire Warlock, and it was suggested to me that a better idea would be to re-write the base class instead.

(If you're interested, I think Hellfire Warlock 2.0 works really well, but it's utterly broken if you use Eldritch Glaive with it...)

Here are some design goals:
  • Iterative Eldritch Blasts
  • More Invocations Known (3/4+2 progression)
  • Reworking some of the Invocations
  • Blast Shape and Essence will remain unchanged
  • The ability to metamagic SLAs a number of times per day based on Cha
  • Other things that I haven't thought of yet

What I've done so far to change it
  • Fiendish Resilience now follows a linear increase (3 instead of 2 at 13).
  • Iterative attacks (discussion ongoing on how to work this).
  • Boosted invocations to a 3/4+2 progression.
  • Imbue invocations--apply metamagic 3+Cha
  • Increased EB every other level, rather than the weird slow down at the end.

Warlock 1.0 isn't OGL, BUT Wizard's has a character sheet for the Warlock posted here, and it includes invocations known and brief explanations of the invocations, so I'm assuming I can post them here. I won't post anything that's not public.

Warlock 2.0

Alignment
Any evil or chaotic.

Hit Die
d6.

Class Skills
The warlock’s class skills (and the key ability for each skill) are Bluff (cha), Concentration (Con), Craft (Int), Dsguise (Cha), Intimidate (Cha), Jump (Str), Knowledge (arcana) (Int), Knowledge (the planes) (Int), Knowledge (religion) (Int), Profession (Wis), Sense Motive (Wis), Spellcraft (Int), and Use Magic Device (Cha).

Skill Points at 1st Level
(2 + Int modifier) ×4.

Skill Points at Each Additional Level
2 + Int modifier.

BAB: 3/4
Saves: Good Will

LevelSpecialInvocations KnownEldritch Blast
1Least Invocations21d6
2Detect Magic3 
3Cold Iron 142d6
4Imbue Invocation: Empower, Deceive Item5 
5 53d6
6Lesser Invocations6 
7Cold Iron 274d6
8Imbue Invocation: Maximize, Fiendish Resilience 18 
9 85d6
10Energy Resistance 59 
11Cold Iron 3, Greater Invocations106d6
12Imbue Invocation: Quicken, Imbue Item11 
13Fiendish Resilience 3117d6
14 12 
15Versatile Blasting, Cold Iron 4138d6
16Imbue Invocation: Player's Choice, Dark Invocations14 
17 149d6
18Fiendish Resilience 515 
19Cold Iron 51610d6
20Energy Resistance 1017 

Invocations (SLA): Save DC, if applicable: 10 + equivalent spell level + Charisma modifier. At level 6, 11, and 16, the Warlock 2.0 may retrain one Invocation known.

Eldritch Blast (SLA): Ray, 60 ft. ranged touch attack; attack action usable at will; no saving throw; half damage to objects; subject to spell resistance; not subject to damage reduction or energy resistances.

Eldritch Blasts and Iterative Attacks:
As a full-round action, a Warlock 2.0 may fire iterative Eldritch Blasts, according to her BAB. A Warlock 2.0 takes a successive -2 penalty to the Save DCs for effects tied to her Blasts Essences and Blast Shapes. A creature that has already been affected by or saved against a blast essence cannot be affected by a blast essence twice in one turn. However, normal damage from each blast applies.

Versatile Blasting: At level 15, a Warlock 2.0 may apply different shapes and essences to his iterative blasts. Again, the same rule applies: if a creature has been affected by, or saved against, the effects of any of the Warlock 2.0's eldritch blasts, it will not be affected a second time that turn by any of that warlock's eldritch essences. However, normal damage from each blast applies.

A blast essence that changes the nature of an eldritch blast (hellfire, vitriolic) applies to all blasts, but any extra damage can only affect a creature once. Thus, three iterative vitriolic blasts are made of acid, bypass SR, and deal extra damage on your next turn. However, any creature struck by a vitriolic blast will only be affected by extra damage as if they had been struck once. In the same way, if a creature is struck by a hellfire blast, that creature will take damage for each of the three iterative attacks, and then only once for the extra damage.


Example:
Morthos the level 15 Warlock can fire three iterative blasts, at a BAB of +11/+6/+1. For the purposes of this example only, the DC for all essences and shapes has the same DC. These DCs for three iterative attacks are 16/14/12.

He fires a Cone-Shaped Nauseating Blast at Creatures One and Two.
Creatures One and Two both fail their reflex saves. Creature One fails his fortitude save and is affected by the Nauseating essence. Creature two saves against the effect. Both Creatures take damage normally from the blast.

He then fires a Cone-Shaped Utterdark Blast. This strikes Creatures Two and Three. Both creatures fail their reflex saves (which had a DC with a -2 penalty, since this is the second iterative attack) and are struck by the Cone. Creature Two has already been affected by a Blast Essence this turn from Morthos, and so only takes normal damage. Creature Three, however, fails his save, takes 2 negative levels, and takes damage normally.

Morthos then turns his sights back on Creature One, firing a Cone-Shaped Sickening Blast against Creatures One and Four. Creature Four succeeds on a Reflex Save to evade the Cone-Shape, since the DC is now at a -4 penalty, and takes half damage from the blast. He fails his fortitude save (which also occured against a DC with a -4 penalty), however, and is affected. Creature One fails his save to evade the blast and takes full damage. Creature One has already been affected by Mortho's blast essences this turn, and so ignores the effect of the essence, even though it is a different blast essence than the one he failed his save against earlier this round.



Detect Magic: Use detect magic at will; caster level equal to class level

Damage Reduction: Cold iron: 1 at 3rd level; 2 at 7th; 3 at 11th; 4 at 15th; 5 at 19th

Deceive Item: Take 10 on Use Magic Device checks even if distracted or threatened

Fiendish Resilience: Once/day; free action; fast healing 2 mins. (1 at 8th lvl; 3 at 13th; 5 at 18th)

Energy Resistance: Choose two, cannot be changed; resistance 5 at 10th level, 10 at 20th lvl

Imbue Item: Create magic items even if spells required to make it are unknown

Imbue Invocation: Starting at 4th-level, you may apply metamagic to your Eldritch Blasts or Invocations. You may use this ability a number of times per day equal to 3 + your Charisma modifier.

Essences and Shapes (No plans to change these)
Spoiler


Least Invocations
Spoiler


Lesser Invocations
Spoiler


Greater Invocations
Spoiler


Dark Invocations
Spoiler
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!

Last edited by Barbarian MD : 03-19-2012 at 03:42 PM.
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 11:00 AM   Top  -  End  -  #2
Eldan
Colossus in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Switzerland
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

What I'd like to see would be more chaos instead of evil themed invocations, especially fey ones. Perhaps a few simple illusions, disguises, a few forest themed magics.
__________________
Extended Brewer's signature

“Not a promise, not an oath, or a malediction or a curse,” I said, sounding calm, probably inaudible in the midst of the screaming. “Inevitable. Wasn’t that how she put it? I told them. Warned them.”
-Taylor Hebert. Yes, I'm a proud Skittle.
Eldan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:42 PM   Top  -  End  -  #3
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

If you have any suggestions, or want to write one up, feel free! The numerical changes were the easy part--writing new invocations and figuring out which ones to cut or modify is going to take a little while longer, and I hear some lecture notes calling to me from the table.
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:44 PM   Top  -  End  -  #4
DaTedinator
Barbarian in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Also, pretty please, make the eldritch blast progression make sense, and just up it every odd level?

I like what you're doing here. The one thing I'm worried about is the iterative eldritch blasts. It's fine as long as there are no blast shapes involved, but firing off three Utterdark Dooms in a round, every round, as often as I want? I'd suggest either making it a blast shape invocation, or at the very least (not sure this would be a good fix, but it'd be something) have the save DC for area effects reduced by the iterative amount.

And then I don't necessarily disagree with it, I'm just curious what made you decide to up the HD.
__________________
I love evaluating and critiquing homebrew material, but I barely even lurk these days. PM me a link if you want me to look your stuff over, and I will if I notice/have the time.

Thanks to Dashwood for the avatar!

My Homebrew; please feel free to critique it. In fact, you are encouraged.

Have you posted your work in the Homebrewer's Compendium?
DaTedinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 12:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #5
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I upped the HD?

Ah. All this time I thought Warlocks were D8... I'll run and change that.
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 02:01 PM   Top  -  End  -  #6
douglas
Titan in the Playground
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 
Norcross, GA
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaTedinator View Post
Also, pretty please, make the eldritch blast progression make sense, and just up it every odd level?
Yes, the arbitrary slowing down at the end is rather odd and nonsensical.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaTedinator View Post
I like what you're doing here. The one thing I'm worried about is the iterative eldritch blasts. It's fine as long as there are no blast shapes involved, but firing off three Utterdark Dooms in a round, every round, as often as I want?
At level 17, when casters have 9th level spells? I think it's just fine. Yes, this is pretty powerful for blasting, but blasting needs the boost unless you're pulling out extreme metamagic stacking with reduced costs, and that option isn't really available to a Warlock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaTedinator View Post
I'd suggest either making it a blast shape invocation, or at the very least (not sure this would be a good fix, but it'd be something) have the save DC for area effects reduced by the iterative amount.
Decreasing the save DCs for the iteratives with area blasts would be a good idea, though.

The access to meta-SLA effects should be spread out, not acquired all at once, and there should be some restrictions (possibly reduced at higher levels) on combining multiple meta-SLAs on the same blasts. Also, I'm not sure about the number of uses per day or all of them drawing from the same pool of uses.
__________________
Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)

Archives:
Spoiler
douglas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 02:29 PM   Top  -  End  -  #7
Random_person
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 
Long Shiny Cloud-land
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

So what are you aiming for here, tier-wise? As I understand it, the old Warlock was high tier 4/low tier 3, and this rewrite looks like a big step up in power.
__________________
If I creep into your house in the dead of night and strangle you while you sleep, you probably messed up your grammar.

Ignis Equine by Akrim.elf, may that name be famed forever.
Random_person is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 02:39 PM   Top  -  End  -  #8
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

--Would you say a progressive -2 penalty on Save DCs for Eldritch Essences and Shapes

As in, Nauseating Blast 1: Full BAB, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma
Nauseating Blast 2: Full BAB-5, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma -2
Nauseating Blast 3: Full BAB-10, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma -4

--I fixed the blast progression to every other level.

--I like the idea of spreading out the metamagic SLAs. I've no real idea how to spread them, but I'll give it some thought in a while and pull some numbers out of the air.

A couple of questions I'd like feedback on:

Should the DR/Cold Iron that a Warlock gets stack with the DR/Cold Iron that Fey get?

Would some sort of Invocation imitating Arcane Sight, or Arcane Sight, Greater be overpowered? It seems like it'd have perfect synergy with the Warlock's dispelling invocations.
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!

Last edited by Barbarian MD : 02-20-2010 at 02:52 PM.
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 03:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #9
douglas
Titan in the Playground
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 
Norcross, GA
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Random_person View Post
So what are you aiming for here, tier-wise? As I understand it, the old Warlock was high tier 4/low tier 3, and this rewrite looks like a big step up in power.
I think mhvaughan is considering making a Warlock as a new character for a particular ongoing campaign he and I are both part of, and existing characters for that campaign are in the tier 2/high tier 3 range, mostly. The party damage dealers are, at level 11, consistently putting out multiple hundreds of damage per round.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhvaughan View Post
--Would you say a progressive -2 penalty on Save DCs for Eldritch Essences and Shapes

As in, Nauseating Blast 1: Full BAB, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma
Nauseating Blast 2: Full BAB-5, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma -2
Nauseating Blast 3: Full BAB-10, DC 10 + Invocation Level + Charisma -4
Sounds about right to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhvaughan View Post
Should the DR/Cold Iron that a Warlock gets stack with the DR/Cold Iron that Fey get?
It already does by RAW, I think, and I say it should.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhvaughan View Post
Would some sort of Invocation imitating Arcane Sight, or Arcane Sight, Greater be overpowered? It seems like it'd have perfect synergy with the Warlock's dispelling invocations.
Not if you put it in the right category. Regular Arcane Sight would be fine as a Lesser invocation, I think, but I'd make Greater Arcane Sight a Dark invocation.
__________________
Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)

Archives:
Spoiler
douglas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 05:19 PM   Top  -  End  -  #10
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I added the Imbue Invocation ability. It advances every 4 levels, and allows you to metamagic an invocation (including EB) 3 + Charisma per day. You gain Heighten at 4 (to bypass SR), Empower at 8, Maximize at 12, and Quicken at 16. If someone has suggestions for different metamagic abilities, or a different progression, let me know.

(I know there are better metamagic choices out there, but I'm just not all that familiar with metamagic.)
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 05:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #11
Eldan
Colossus in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Switzerland
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

You could, of course, also make the more powerful shapes standard actions. It's questionable if that wouldn't be underpowered, though.

And as for making new invocations: I tried in the past, but I never got anything flavourful beyond "As spell X". So, not really something I can help you with. Fey Glamour would be fun.
__________________
Extended Brewer's signature

“Not a promise, not an oath, or a malediction or a curse,” I said, sounding calm, probably inaudible in the midst of the screaming. “Inevitable. Wasn’t that how she put it? I told them. Warned them.”
-Taylor Hebert. Yes, I'm a proud Skittle.

Last edited by Eldan : 02-20-2010 at 05:46 PM.
Eldan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 05:52 PM   Top  -  End  -  #12
Stycotl
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 
bouncing around the world
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

first impressions (and by no means well thought out or super intelligent):

1––if you want to up the number of invocations, start at level one. give them two invocations at level one and work your way up from there.

2––don't try to balance against the watchtower group. balance against an existing class, even if it is tier 2 or so, and then, if we need to, we'll optimize in-game in order to bring it up to par with levi, kelurn, and the others.

3––i agree that the interatives should be a blast shape, as i've already mentioned in the game thread, but i am still open to it being part of the regular class mechanics. there should be some serious drawback to that though, to the point where it would be beneficial for a warlock to sometimes use a standard action blast (kind of like ToB made standard action attacks viable to melee types).

4––um, that might be it at the moment. i'll post more when i come up with more.
__________________
my own diabolical experiments (homebrew)

my pbp

my deviantART

my alter ego

Announcer— “Your cable television is experiencing difficulties. Please do not panic. Resist the temptation to read or talk to loved ones. Do not attempt sexual relations, as years of TV radiation have left your genitals withered and useless.”

Wiggum, checking— “Well I'll be damned.”
Stycotl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 12:02 AM   Top  -  End  -  #13
Random_person
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 
Long Shiny Cloud-land
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

And I've decided I like this so much I used it as the base for a prestige class I just made. Here.
__________________
If I creep into your house in the dead of night and strangle you while you sleep, you probably messed up your grammar.

Ignis Equine by Akrim.elf, may that name be famed forever.
Random_person is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 04:32 PM   Top  -  End  -  #14
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stycotl View Post
first impressions (and by no means well thought out or super intelligent):

1––if you want to up the number of invocations, start at level one. give them two invocations at level one and work your way up from there.
Sounds good to me. How many would you suggest having in total by level 20?

Quote:
3––i agree that the interatives should be a blast shape, as i've already mentioned in the game thread, but i am still open to it being part of the regular class mechanics. there should be some serious drawback to that though, to the point where it would be beneficial for a warlock to sometimes use a standard action blast (kind of like ToB made standard action attacks viable to melee types).
So, two options here, I think:
1) Would be to make it a BLAST SHAPE, which prevents you from using the chain, cone, spear, and doom shapes.

I think that may be underpowered, in the end. My reasoning is that you would often find yourself in situations where you could deal more damage through the use of a chain, cone, or doom, and if you use reach on a fleeing creature, it will be about as effective as a slap across the face, since you're only hitting them with a single EB. I think this is especially true with the doom shape, which lets you hit every creature within a 20' radius. And a chain, while only dealing half damage to subsequent creatures, uses your highest BAB, and let's you hit two extra creatures for half damage, if I remember correctly.

As I think about it, this is somewhat mitigated by buffs. If you had haste up, you'd get four attacks at level 20, rather than just 3. Righteous Wrath of the Faithful would boost this to 4 attacks. And this is assuming a standard Warlock 2.0, rather than PrCs.

2) Make it a CLASS FEATURE, with three options that aren't necessarily exclusive:

a) penalize subsequent blasts. This is what I've built into it thus far. You take a cumulative -2 penalty on the save DCs for effects tied to your blasts after the first one (0/-2/-4/-6). We could even ramp it up if you think it needs it by decreasing the ability of subsequent blasts to penetrate SR by 1 or 2 points, cumulative (0/-1/-2/-3).

b) penalize all blasts when using iteratives. We could make it like flurry, which lets you make an extra attack, but at a -2 penalty to ALL attacks. So if you're BAB is +15/+10/+5, you could make a single attack at +15, or a full attack at +13/+8/+3. That's a simple method.

c) give a bonus to using single attacks, similar to martial maneuvers. Rather than penalize multiple blasts, I think consensus might be to increase the effects of a single blast. So instead of taking a penalty for a set of iterative blasts, we might give a bonus to spell penetration when you're using a single blast.
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!

Last edited by Barbarian MD : 02-21-2010 at 04:34 PM.
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 06:42 PM   Top  -  End  -  #15
Mulletmanalive
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 
WOTC ≱ my opinion
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Not that this is all that important, but there is a perfectly sensical reason as to why the Eldritch Blast progression was the way it was.

It has a spell level = Dice thing going on and Wizards didn't want 10th level effects happening before 21st level. Simple.

They probabaly reasoned that not boosting it was offset by Utterdark Blast anyway.

On actual mechanical terms, I'm more for seperating the two categories of invocation [blast and utility] and having seperate progressions. Maybe just as simple as the normal Warlock one for utility and 6 more over the 20 levels for blasting type things. One of each at first level.

I personally never found the Warlock underpowered, but then i don't play with a group of optimisers. My favourite trick was the Cone shape and that essence that knocks people over
__________________
Mine is not so much a Peter Pan Complex as a Peter Pan Doom Fortress and Underground LairTM!
Fae-o-matic Want a fae from folklore stated? Give me the lore and I'll do it for you!
Le Cirque Funeste Evil Fairy Circus! Ray Bradbury, refined down to snortable powder!

Last edited by Mulletmanalive : 02-21-2010 at 06:47 PM.
Mulletmanalive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 04:42 AM   Top  -  End  -  #16
Latronis
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I'd like an option to have DR\Silver instead.

If you are concerned about iterative attacks you could just make it so that Eldritch essence invocations are always a standard action. Blast shapes are probably fine.
__________________
Latronis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 07:23 AM   Top  -  End  -  #17
Eldan
Colossus in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Switzerland
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I wouldn't differentiate between the two kinds of invocations: in my opinion, the choice between utility mage and blaster caster should be the player's.

That said, I second giving him a second invocation at level one.
__________________
Extended Brewer's signature

“Not a promise, not an oath, or a malediction or a curse,” I said, sounding calm, probably inaudible in the midst of the screaming. “Inevitable. Wasn’t that how she put it? I told them. Warned them.”
-Taylor Hebert. Yes, I'm a proud Skittle.
Eldan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 10:01 AM   Top  -  End  -  #18
Anonymouswizard
Barbarian in the Playground
 
GnomeWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 
England, a less posh part
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Maybe give them an ability to channel multiple essences/shapes into an eldritch blast by making them spend more time on it: first they can put two on, then for the third it increases up to a full-round action, then for four 1 round, than for each additional essence or shape make it take an extra round. I can't see warlocks using more than 3 or 4 invocations on an attack, and those are heavy blasters.

For invocations, maybe start it at 2 and do a 3/4+2 progression? this lets them gain a decent number of invocations (and, to be honest, many of the good lessers), as well as upping their tier.
__________________
You do not have to call me by the full name, abreviate as you like.

LotR music video

There are three alignment axis: good vs evil, law vs chaos, and liner vs quadratic (wait a minute, that's classes!).
Spoiler
Anonymouswizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 09:49 PM   Top  -  End  -  #19
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I'd like to hear more opinions on making Eldritch Blast iterative. Is there consensus that it should be a class feature, or should it take the form of a blast shape? What penalties/bonuses should exist to encourage people to make single blasts? I want to hear a lot of opinions and well-thought out arguments before finalizing that particular feature. Thanks!
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 10:47 PM   Top  -  End  -  #20
Latronis
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Depends what you would allow with it.

The default blast as iterative is fine

even with blast shapes it's probably fine, though eldritch glaive may be potentially abuseable

the rest of the invocations though is likely too much, any dispels or save or suck effects become too good especially without any resource investment
__________________
Latronis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 10:57 PM   Top  -  End  -  #21
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

So you're saying that iterative blasts + blast essences would be bad?
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 10:58 PM   Top  -  End  -  #22
DaTedinator
Barbarian in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I like the idea of giving a boost to single blasts, and otherwise using iterative blasts as you have them written.

I'd also like the option for DR/silver, given Devils (who have DR/silver) are the more stereotypical "businessmen" of the fiends (as in, selling your soul to them for power and such).

Actually, somewhat on that note, it might not be a bad idea to open up the alignment spectrum, given Complete Mage's precedents of Fey and Celestial warlocks.
__________________
I love evaluating and critiquing homebrew material, but I barely even lurk these days. PM me a link if you want me to look your stuff over, and I will if I notice/have the time.

Thanks to Dashwood for the avatar!

My Homebrew; please feel free to critique it. In fact, you are encouraged.

Have you posted your work in the Homebrewer's Compendium?
DaTedinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 11:14 PM   Top  -  End  -  #23
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Latronis, i just caught your meaning. I'm definitely not going to write in the ability to make iterative invocations, so don't worry. That'd be insane. (I'm currently dfferentiating between "invocations" and "essences". The design currently allows you to fire off three bewitching chain eldritch blasts, but not three chilling tentacles. The bewitching blast saves would follow a 0/-2/-4 penalty.)

You do bring up a good point--multiple save or fall/nauseated/etc might not be so hot, even with the proposed -2 penalty. Would it be a good idea to say that you may only apply a blast essence/shape to a single blast per round (or one essence on one blast and one shape on another blast, if you desired), and then the remainder of your iteratives would be normal blasts?
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!

Last edited by Barbarian MD : 02-23-2010 at 11:27 PM.
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 11:22 PM   Top  -  End  -  #24
Latronis
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaTedinator View Post
Actually, somewhat on that note, it might not be a bad idea to open up the alignment spectrum, given Complete Mage's precedents of Fey and Celestial warlocks.
I like that idea.

If it were me I might be inclined to to make some kind of 'pact' path (the character need not be aware of the source) With class abilities somewhat defined by the source of the power.

Celestial, Fey, Abyssal, Infernal possibly dragon if you wanna lump the dragon fire adept in with it
__________________
Latronis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 11:24 PM   Top  -  End  -  #25
Barbarian MD
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

I like the idea. If you have suggestions on how to flesh that out, i'd be happy to hear them!
__________________
Fantastic Barbarian, M.D. avatar by Ceika

My 'brews

Are you a Hombrewer? Submit your creations to the GiTP Homebrew [Compendium] threads!
Barbarian MD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 11:40 PM   Top  -  End  -  #26
Latronis
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Depends how much work you want to do.

Resilience\resistance aswell as the damage reduction can vary based on the source. Perhaps some immunities, Obv Demons and Fey grant Cold Iron and Devils silver, though what celestials power would grant is a bit odd. Magic seems the most obvious but not really as useful as a material DR. Alternatively that could be based on alignment (chaotic = cold iron, lawful = silver, neutral = choose?) though that doesn't really fit in the paths either.

possibly the imbue invocation can vary, though that is perhaps a little stifling for the character. (eg. why can't my fey warlock use empower?!)

They could possibly choose from an alternative list of invocations. So you could have a standard warlock list, plus one for each source and they choose from those 2 lists. Alternatively use default invocation progression and have a 'power source' (like advanced learning) so they choose from the source list for invocations beyond the standard warlock.
__________________
Latronis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 05:46 AM   Top  -  End  -  #27
Eldan
Colossus in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Switzerland
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

You'd need a broader spectrum of invocations, then. Those that are there tend heavily towards the chaotic and evil. I'd also sort them by alignment: Evil, Chaotic, Good, Lawful and Neutral Invocations. Or Invocations by pact, but many of them fit in several. All fiends and the Unseelie could use darkness, as an example.
__________________
Extended Brewer's signature

“Not a promise, not an oath, or a malediction or a curse,” I said, sounding calm, probably inaudible in the midst of the screaming. “Inevitable. Wasn’t that how she put it? I told them. Warned them.”
-Taylor Hebert. Yes, I'm a proud Skittle.
Eldan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 09:38 AM   Top  -  End  -  #28
Mulletmanalive
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 
WOTC ≱ my opinion
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Is darkness evil or more chaos aligned? Never did really decide on that one...

I'd go for Iterative as a class feature but make the penalties to saves in line with the attack roll ones: More reliable damage but most likely significantly less of it...
__________________
Mine is not so much a Peter Pan Complex as a Peter Pan Doom Fortress and Underground LairTM!
Fae-o-matic Want a fae from folklore stated? Give me the lore and I'll do it for you!
Le Cirque Funeste Evil Fairy Circus! Ray Bradbury, refined down to snortable powder!
Mulletmanalive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 09:40 AM   Top  -  End  -  #29
Eldan
Colossus in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Switzerland
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Well, devils are the ones who get perfect darkvision. Demons don't, if I'm not mistaken. On the other hand Pandemonium is really the darkest of all outer planes, all in all, and it's chaotic. So, evil, probably. The seelie fey don't seem to use darkness as much.
__________________
Extended Brewer's signature

“Not a promise, not an oath, or a malediction or a curse,” I said, sounding calm, probably inaudible in the midst of the screaming. “Inevitable. Wasn’t that how she put it? I told them. Warned them.”
-Taylor Hebert. Yes, I'm a proud Skittle.
Eldan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 10:05 PM   Top  -  End  -  #30
Latronis
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Warlock 2.0 - WIP

Not too many demons or devils actually use darkness or better as spell like abilities either.
__________________
Latronis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.