2/28/2013 - Update on Thumb
12/31/2012 - There's a New Comic
12/12/2012 - The "Lost" Holiday Ornament (and Child's Play)
11/26/2012 - Leftover OOTS Swag on Sale (+Thumb Report)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 889 Get Real
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com!
RSS Feeds: OOTS

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew
Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 



Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Gaming > Roleplaying Games
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

Roleplaying Games The all-purpose forum for general advice or system-independent (or multi-system) discussion. Come discuss adventure plots, gamemastering dilemmas, or player advice here. For ruleset-specific discussions, see the subforums.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2010, 07:52 AM   Top  -  End  -  #151
ShneekeyTheLost
Titan in the Playground
 
BardGuy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 
I wish I knew...
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

I will probably get a chance to go over the builds in detail and deliver my scores some time this evening, or by Wednesday at the very latest.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flickerdart View Post
Wizard is easy mode. Real optimizers use Samurai!
Spoiler
ShneekeyTheLost is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:35 AM   Top  -  End  -  #152
Akal Saris
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

I believe Shen's build is legal actually. He took Silverbrow human and the substitution level for sorcerer that trades its familiar for Draconic Heritage. Draconic Heritage: Battle Dragon gives sorcerers perform as a class skill if I recall, so he can reach the max ranks.
__________________
Handbooks: (Hosted on BG)
[3.5] The Poison Handbook
[3.5] (New) Master of Shrouds Handbook
[3.5 Base Class] Healer's Handbook

Trophies!
Spoiler
Akal Saris is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:39 AM   Top  -  End  -  #153
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akal Saris View Post
I believe Shen's build is legal actually. He took Silverbrow human and the substitution level for sorcerer that trades its familiar for Draconic Heritage. Draconic Heritage: Battle Dragon gives sorcerers perform as a class skill if I recall, so he can reach the max ranks.
This is correct, so unless he breaks the rules somewhere else, Shen is fine.
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:59 AM   Top  -  End  -  #154
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

This serves as a good reminder to all of us who are or would be contestants to cite materials; I'd hate to see a legal build get points docked because the creator didn't specify how s/he was making something work that isn't legal to a less-than thorough examination. It's a good thing Akal's got such strong op-fu!
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:42 AM   Top  -  End  -  #155
Draz74
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 
San Diego
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akal Saris View Post
I believe Shen's build is legal actually. He took Silverbrow human and the substitution level for sorcerer that trades its familiar for Draconic Heritage. Draconic Heritage: Battle Dragon gives sorcerers perform as a class skill if I recall, so he can reach the max ranks.
Ah, cool. It's nice to see how many ways people came up with to get Perform, other than Bard/Rogue/Factotum/Monk. Draconic Heritage (battle dragon) feat, Apprentice (entertainer) feat, Half-Elf Paragon class, Jester class. Shame the Jester one didn't pan out.
__________________
You can call me Draz.
Trophies:
Spoiler

Work on my homebrew system, CRE8, is still marching slowly onwards. I think I can see the light at the end of the tunnel -- an Alpha release -- in the distance now. Read my Design Goals here.
Draz74 is online now  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:50 AM   Top  -  End  -  #156
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Human Paragon class work as well, Draz. I actually really like that entry too, since Adaptive Learner can really help out.
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 03:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #157
Akal Saris
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Here’s my feedback on each of the submissions. I was very impressed by the quality of the submissions, and by the range of builds presented. And now, onto the builds themselves!

Jereth
Spoiler


Shen the Masked Dragon
Spoiler


The Masquerade:
Spoiler


Seera
Spoiler

Keiji
Spoiler


Nameless
Spoiler


Dagger:
Spoiler


Tanitha No-Face
Spoiler
__________________
Handbooks: (Hosted on BG)
[3.5] The Poison Handbook
[3.5] (New) Master of Shrouds Handbook
[3.5 Base Class] Healer's Handbook

Trophies!
Spoiler
Akal Saris is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 04:43 PM   Top  -  End  -  #158
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Thank you, Akal Saris, for getting your judging done so quickly!

*Scribbles notes from the Reigning Champ in an effort to improve in future*
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 04:56 PM   Top  -  End  -  #159
Ajadea
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 
Not Here
Gender: Female
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Looks like so far Keiji's in the lead. Wonder who entered it?
__________________
Games DMing: The Wrong Guys
deviantArt~~~
I have a Nuzlocke Comic too.


Drowning in schoolwork. Expect limited posting.

Avatar by me.
Ajadea is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 05:30 PM   Top  -  End  -  #160
Private-Prinny
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajadea View Post
Looks like so far Keiji's in the lead. Wonder who entered it?
You'll find out after the other 4 judges give their opinions.

It also looks like Ingus was right. At the moment, it's a three-way battle between Keiji, Seera, and the never-ending backstory.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Private-Prinny is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 06:03 PM   Top  -  End  -  #161
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

I'm pretty sure I know who Seera is from ^_^
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by Musashi.
Heliomance is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 06:08 PM   Top  -  End  -  #162
Private-Prinny
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heliomance View Post
I'm pretty sure I know who Seera is from ^_^
Me too.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Private-Prinny is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 06:08 PM   Top  -  End  -  #163
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Well, yes. He sent it to you!
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by Musashi.
Heliomance is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:22 PM   Top  -  End  -  #164
Hand_of_Vecna
Barbarian in the Playground
 
NecromancerGuy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Yeah! That took forever!

Janeth

Power-hmmm well since you dipped several classes that are often considered weak and used your casting progression on a halfcasting PrC the bar is pretty
low and you definately cleared it. 4

Elegence-I'm kind of annoyed that at very low levels the character is basically a weaker swashbuckler, on the other hand your backstory implies he wasn't an adventurer/a character meant to be played at low levels. Any instinct to deduct points for dipping is completely dismissed when I see that the dips make the character the unfocused fop he’s supposed to be and taking their stronger levels feels very appropriate after he’s unlocked his true potential. 4.5

Use of secret Ingredient-Takes all ten levels and is made of fail without it. 5

Originality- While very well written the background and overall concept/feel are very much what I expected to be par for the course, however the mechanically the character being unable to be a chameleon is great. 4

Overall 4.375

Shen

Power- I like the use of multiple wand sheaths (or whatever their called) to make the sorceror dip that should feel like a boost rather than a drain at low levels on the other hand theres enough sorceror casting that I would want to see more at the table. 3

Elegance- MoM feels like it was forced upon what could have been a much stronger gish. 3.5

Use of Secret ingredient- MoM doesn’t seem to do much other than add more skills. I loved the multiple exotic weapons with wand sheaths however it feels like it could have been done with martial weapons. Maybe some synergy’s not seeing with some of the weapons. 2.5

Originality- I wasn’t expecting to see a fighter/sorceror gish but, abjurant champion is pretty much the text book method to make any random build into a decent gish. 3.5

Overall 3.125

Masquerade

Power-Seems like a fairly strong character; enough Barbarian to get what you want out of it, a bard dip for skills/music/minor casting then MoM. Then MoM it seems like you pretty much took all the best masks though it’s a bit disappointing that it seems like he walks around in gladiator 90% of the time and uses it to simulate a single feat. The end result seems significantly weaker than Barbarian 20 or Barbarian 10/Bard 10 2.5

Elegance-The build is simple, and decent. Even though the build was strong for 10 levels then went down hill when you took MoM, I feel like this isn’t due to MoM being ham fisted into a good build but, the build failing to meat your expectatons. 4

Use of Secret Ingredient- Even though as I said MoM drags this character down and te masks other than gladiator are under used I still like your “Use” of the secret ingrediant. 3.5

Origionality- I wasn’t expecting to see a Barbarian build, and Barbarian/Bard/MoM is probably the most original and coolest builds I’ve ever seen for the classic barbarian>slave>gladiator>hero character. 4.5

Overall 3.625

I’d like to say a few things here, first if MoM was a stronger melee class, say medium BAB and two floating feats like chameleon or if gladiator granted 1 or two fighter feats at high levels, your power would be much higher. Also one thing I loved is it made me think of Pro wrestling if that was intentional playing that up could have netted a higher Use of Secret Ingredient and Originality score. Since at level ten you can make masks invisible he could make all but the gladiator mask invisible then use the angel mask to descend from the heavens, then use some bard spells for special effects, then switch to jester for a bonus to perform(weapon drill) bard spells could help here too.

Seera

Power- I’m tempted to go higher however this character is weak for an Artificer and as I said enter the before I grade on a sliding scale based on your class(es) you enter the PrC as. 3.5

Elegence-I really like the way the Artificer levels are mixed in at the new mask levels it’s a very nice melding of crunch and fluff. The items you crafted were great and I think that the cool factor would get them past most DM’s however they would probably regret it later and nerf it. I’m really torn on how to score you here because honestly most of the above negatives are true almost anytime a artificer is involved. 3.5

Use of Secret Ingredient-This MoM build is well a Master of Masks. The use of mask switching to break action economy was great and without that cheese it’s still cool as hell. 5

Originality- I really like the overall character the things you did mechanically are really great. And it’s well Original. 5

Overall 4.25

Kuiji

Power-Well he’s an Apostle of Peace, He can cast high level spells, and can do significant subdual damage and inflict non-damage status effects. This is pretty much standard for an AoP. 3.5

Elegance-The alternating levels of ninja and monk seem to work quite well I could easily see them in Dragon Magazine as the first 7 levels of “Student of the Sister Schools”. Monk/Ninja is a good lead in to AoP but that’s no surprise. MoM feels tacked on at the end also flight comes from angel not archmage but more importantly you already have air walk, which can use your increased speed, from AoP when you take your first level of MoM. 2.5

Use of Secret Ingredient- MoM is tacked on, it feels like it’s most useful ability to this build is advancing it’s 4/10 casting advancement. 2

Originality-I’ve seen plenty of unarmed AoPs but, I didn’t expect one in this competition. 4

Overall: 3.0

Faceless

Power- Chameleon 7 gives you 6th level casting from two lists while incarnum and MoM grant decent constant abilities. 4

Elegance- It all makes sense. Nothing wrong with it but, no great synergy either. Also Chameleon and MoM don’t seem to mesh well, unless MoM is a dip, it feels like it’s taking away chameleon levels that would be better. 3

Use of Secret Ingredient- I meant to say in my post about judging criteria that I’d give a one in Origionality and Use of Secret Ingredient to any build that had MoM+Chameleon levels at or approaching 15. I meant to, but didn’t, so I won’t be quite so harsh. Also he has enough MoM levels tat his masks are a significant boost even though the character is less powerful/versatile the same build with less MoM and more Chameleon. 2.5

Originality-Incarnum and the backstory were cool but wandering jack of all trades chameleon/MoM not original. 2.5

Overall 3

Dagger

Power-Weak for an Archivist but really, spymaster is the most prominent class outside of MoM and dagger is an exceptional spymaster. 4

Elegance- This is definitely a simple elegant build. Factotum 1/Archivist 4 is as good a jumping off point as any. 4

Use of Secret Ingredient- I loved how all the covers were masked for various reasons. MoM goes a long ways towards impersonating figures with vastly different abilities. The advancements to Archivist casting were helpful too without overshadowing the non casting abilities. 4.5

Origionality-MoM as a masked spy, not surprising. However the background was very fresh and I wasn’t expecting spymaster, largely because it’s not a powerful class, but it was very well used. 4

Overall: 4.25

No Face

First, you seem to be under the mistaken impression that caster level boosts grant you better spells per day, sorry they don’t they simply make spells with effects that have “/ lvl” variables more powerful. A level 20 this build will cast as a 7th lvl cleric with a meaning fourth level spells with a caster level of 13. You also cannot take practiced spell caster twice for 1 class.

Power- With 4th level cleric spells, low level assassin spells, MoM abilities probably floating around tier 4-low 3. 2.5

Elegance- Until I figured out the caster level mistake I was seriously scratching my head at this build. Also the Assassin class isn’t especially helpful to you. I believe you’d be better off as a spell thief or lurk 10. Also philosophy clerics are often frowned upon by Dms. I’ll show some leniency though since you thought cleric would be more useful than it is by giving you casting to bump up to high power levels. 2.5

Use of Secret Ingredient-Hard to judge since you thought it was giving you 6 levels of cleric casting. Though I suppose I should rate low for putting poor casting advancment ahead of any other abilities. 2

Originality - A multitalented assassin is one of the first things that comes to mind for MoM and a street child with magical talent is a stereotypical assassin. Also in addition to being suboptimal Assassin levels are also predictable. 2

Overall: 2.25

Last edited by Hand_of_Vecna : 06-28-2010 at 07:24 PM.
Hand_of_Vecna is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:35 PM   Top  -  End  -  #165
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Again, thank you for your prompt evaluation, Hand of Vecna.
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:38 PM   Top  -  End  -  #166
The Vorpal Tribble
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 
The Mindfields
Gender: Female
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

I'm amused how opposite some of the votes are for the same builds.
The Vorpal Tribble is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #167
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vorpal Tribble View Post
I'm amused how opposite some of the votes are for the same builds.
Given how some of the builds make radically different assumptions about the masks, that's sort of expected.
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:58 PM   Top  -  End  -  #168
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Boilerplate Disclaimer: anything said below is a reflection of my personal opinion towards the work presented for my viewing, nothing more. I make no judgments about the presenter, as the level of effort expended to create something for this is absolutely marvelous. Well done, everyone.

Jereth

Originality: 3.5. Lots of Paragon classes was actually something I was really expecting to see. Swashbuckler and Assassin were a bit new, but overall, this is just on the good side of expected.
Power: 3. Seems solid in many areas. Your damage out-put is acceptable, if unexceptional. Jereth seems like a character who can do a lot and is useful in a lot of ways, but can't stand up in any single way for long.
Elegance: 4. This is smoothly executed and well built. I'm impressed, actually, at the synergies you discovered here. Well done.
Use of Master of Masks: 4.5. This feels to me like a textbook case of excellent usage of MoM. I see no flaws in how you used the class.

Total: 3.75. This is a solid, enjoyable build. Your story was creative and well-written, the character was interestingly thought out, I'm pleased with it. Well done.

Shen, the Masked Dragon

Originality: 3.5. I was expecting a gish build. I wasn't expecting it to start with a Thug Zhent Fighter. Creative. I like it.
Power: 4. I think Shen has more raw ability at his fingertips than, say, Jereth, thanks to the better spell list and more focus on the casting (thanks to Abjurant Champion). He's got a lot of tricks and probably a lot of raw power.
Elegance: 3. Something about it rubs me wrong. It feels interesting, but uninspired. It's hard to place, but I'm going with my gut here. This isn't a slam on you, but something about Shen just feels... "eh".
Use of Master of Masks: 3.5. This is a good use of MoM, though not the best. I notice a heavy reliance on Wraithstrike, which I feel is somewhat "eh" especially when you have other gishy things you could be doing. Instead, it's "wraithstrike, PA with a spiked chain" which while GOOD is sorta EH. I like at higher levels how you use the immediate action mask swaps to use the Archmage Mask to do hilarious stuff.

Total: 3.5. Shen's a good solid character. Something puts me off slightly, but since I can't place it, I won't really dock you for it.

The Masquerade

Originality: 3.5. Bard? Ok. Barbarian...? Uh... ok? 6 levels of Barbarian? Ok, you lost me now. Creative indeed.
Power: 2.5. The Masquerade doesn't seem that powerful. He's got the mask tricks, and he's got the barbarian charging, but those don't mix amazingly well really (what with MoM being a half BAB class and Bard not being great either).
Elegance: 3. Well, it's clean. Can't say much more than that really. I mean, Bbn 6/Brd 4/MoM 10 is the cleanest build I've seen yet.
Use of Master of Masks: 2. This isn't a good use really. I hate giving bad scores, I really do, but this is not a good place for the class. It's a cute idea, I like the image of a grandstanding gladiator, but it mechanically doesn't flow well (I think a 1 level dip for the Gladiator mask would be better for this concept).

Total: 2.75. It's a nice image, but not much more. It's playable, but not in a game that uses more than Tier 3-4 classes (and that's probably debatable actually, it's likely better suited for Tiers 4-5).

Seera d’Cannith

Originality: 4. Artificer was not expected. Not at ALL.
Power: 5. You win at everything forever. Artificer is brutally powerful, your reading of Master of Masks is HILARIOUS in its abusability, and this is probably one of the most potentially powerful new builds I've seen in a long time.
Elegance: 2. Eh. I hate giving you this score. However, what you're doing is abusing the custom item creation rules, which, well, is an ABUSE. Those rules are well understood to be easily breakable, and are often not permitted at tables. This character, as much as I like it, is breakable in this regard, and so gets a low score on Elegance from me (relying on a cheesy mechanic is never good for elegance).
Use of Master of Masks: 3? This is tough to judge. On the one hand, it's a great usage of a subpar class. On the other hand, its really just a unique outlet for abuse of the magic item creation rules. I can't really say it's a BAD use of MoM, but I'm not going to call it the best one I've ever seen. It's creative and unique though.

Total: 3.5. The power is off the chain (lolificier helps here), the creativity is pretty good, but the use of the secret ingredient and the abuse of the creation rules mark it down.

Keiji Mutoh
Ok, an introductory note I want to make for Keiji. Something about this dude makes me lol REALLY hard. Can't place why, but damn, dude makes me laugh. Ninja for Peace is hilarious and reminds me of Dr. McNinja, which means I'm happy reading this dude already.

Originality: 4.5. Apostle of Peace+Ninja=/=Master of Masks in my mind's eye. I was blown away. GREAT job with the mindtwist there.
Power: 4. Well, he's an excellent support character, with enough good abilities (I overlooked Cry of Ysgard before, never doing THAT again) to stay relevant for a long while. I fear he might fall out of real usefulness later in his career, but, Planar Ally (much as I hate that line of spells) solves much.
Elegance: 4. It's not the smoothest level progression. It only takes 9 levels of MoM. However, you managed to blend Apostle of Peace, Ninja/Monk, and Master of Masks into a single cohesive whole that is really creative and flavorful. If this isn't the definition of Elegance, I don't know what is.
Use of Master of Masks: 3.5. Gotta ding you. You only took 9 levels, and I feel like that last level would have been GREAT for the build's power (immediate action switching is amazing).

Total: 4. Great build. Highly unexpected, very workable, looks fun. I approve.

The Faceless

Originality: 4. Wasn't expecting to see Incarnum. Probably should have in retrospect.
Power: 4. Seems very capable in many respects. The Faceless looks like you put a large amount of mechanical effort into him, which I respect and like to see.
Elegance: 1.5. Ugh. I HATE scoring like this, but you did a bunch of stuff that just bothered me. Totemist AND Incarnate? 1 random level of Factotum? The same amount of Chameleon as Master of Masks? This is not elegant! It's a mess! Yes, it makes a better character, but dammit, it looks terrible!
Use of Master of Masks: 2. Chameleon. You took 7 levels of MoM AND of Chameleon. You could easily have cut three from the latter and given them to the former, and you didn't, and I have to wonder why. Was it for power? Did you just not like Master of Masks (it's crying itself to sleep tonight because you don't love it enough )? I don't know what it was, but it saddens me and cheapens a good build.

Total: 2.875. I feel guilty. It was a good concept, neato story (loved the tripwires, great cruel touch), and pretty solid, but the gaffs with the build just put me off something fierce.

Dagger
A note about Dagger. This build is questionable. The taking of Vow of Poverty is, at best, RAW abuse. See, when you stop meeting the prerequisites of a feat, you lose it. That's how feats work (and this is clarified somewhere, not sure where though, sorry). Also, when you lose an Exalted feat, it is implied it's gone forever (not RAW that I know of, but it's implied VERY strongly and is probably RAI). Thus, I really don't think VoP works here. I am grading it as though VoP is some other, irrelevant, feat (like Toughness).

Originality: 3.5. I LOVED the story, it's masterfully written and very very enjoyable to read. Not what I was expecting at ALL. However, the mechanics weren't that unexpected (I was expecting more Spymaster than we've seen actually).
Power: 3.5. Dagger is pretty competent overall. Not much unique, though he'd be a brutally hard to pin-down opponent.
Elegance: 3.5. It's alright elegance-wise, really hard for me to say anything super interesting or crazily unique about it (but see Use of MoM below).
Use of Master of Masks: 2. STOP DOING THE 7/7 THING! Really guys, make a sacrifice here. Spymaster, while nice and everything, wasn't the secret ingredient here! Master of Masks was!

Total: 3.125. A good, if unexciting, character. The 7/7 thing needs to go away though.

Tanitha No-Face

Originality: 2.5. Rogue/Assassin/MoM with a Cleric dip. Ho-hum.
Power: 2.5. Due to Practiced Spellcaster not doing what you seem to think (it only advances Caster Level, NOT Spells Per Day, and doesn't stack besides), this build is pretty underwhelming. It's a fairly bad sneaky rogue with some minor cleric spells. Now, if MoM was advancing Assassin casting and you had a better Int, it might be a little better... but then why have Cleric at all?
Elegance: 3. It's functional, if unexciting. The whole CL=/=Spells Per Day thing is a bad mark though.
Use of Master of Masks: 3. It's a standard use, if subpar IMO.

Total: 2.75. It stabs dudes and they falls downs. Gogo Assassin. You goofed really hard on Practiced Spellcaster, and need to brush up on what that actually does. Otherwise, there's some promise here.

Personal favorite: Dagger, actually. Now, I didn't score him that well, but I LOVED the story and the perspective. It was deliciously twisted and I loved every single god damn minute of it.

Highest Score: The Ninja of Peace, Keiji. He's pretty far and away the best thing here, IMO.

Again, well done one and all.
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:59 PM   Top  -  End  -  #169
Ozymandias9
Barbarian in the Playground
 
GnomeWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Just got my first look at the entries. Will look at them tonight, should have scores up in the next two days.
__________________
78% of DM's started their first campaign in a tavern. [...]Where did you start yours?
A street riot in a major city that was getting violent.
Spoiler
Ozymandias9 is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:00 PM   Top  -  End  -  #170
Hand_of_Vecna
Barbarian in the Playground
 
NecromancerGuy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Your Welcome, and ya I expected alot of my judging to go against the grain. I tried to explain myself. Also since # levels taken in the secret ingredient has gone up since the first few competitions I was really strict about wanting people to USE the secret ingredient.

Oh, lemme come out and say something now, I got my judging out early for two reasons.

1. To spark discussion since I have some very different thoughts then some and

2. Tossing it out there if I bashed your build mechanically and you think I missed something let me know and I'll take a second look.
Hand_of_Vecna is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:15 PM   Top  -  End  -  #171
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

This contest was really excellent. There were a LARGE number of great stories (which are fun to write and to read and make me WAY more interested in judging).

However, there was a massive issue I encountered more than once (how, I don't know): the "lets take equal levels in Master of Masks and something else" syndrome. What's this about folks? I mean, really? This contest is about Master of Masks! Not Chameleon, not Spymaster, not any other class or prestige class, it's about Master of Masks. At least make it the dominant class in your build! This really ticked me off, and I tanked two builds because of it (even my favorite build, Dagger). It says that you didn't really care enough to shuffle stuff around and get MoM as the focus, which doesn't speak well of you, the cook.

Still, that major issue aside, I was very pleased with this contest. There were some great builds, and I'm interested to know who made Dagger specifically. Man, I LOVED him. I've got my guesses, but, yeah.
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:26 PM   Top  -  End  -  #172
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Thank you for your quick and insightful commentary, arguskos.
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:28 PM   Top  -  End  -  #173
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amphetryon View Post
Thank you for your quick and insightful commentary, arguskos.
1. Damn right.

2. Much as I appreciate it, ya don't need to thank me dude. To quote, "We don't do this... thing because we want to. We do it because we're compelled to."
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:31 PM   Top  -  End  -  #174
Arbitrarity
Troll in the Playground
 
RedWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

*takes notes for future contests*

I want another of these soon :D. They're fun.
__________________
Let's Play: Dragon Age: Origins

Last edited by Arbitrarity : 06-28-2010 at 08:32 PM.
Arbitrarity is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:38 PM   Top  -  End  -  #175
Amphetryon
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by arguskos View Post
1. Damn right.

2. Much as I appreciate it, ya don't need to thank me dude. To quote, "We don't do this... thing because we want to. We do it because we're compelled to."
Yeah, but thanking Akal Saris for getting it done so fast means I come across as a bit more of a jerk than usual if I don't extend the same courtesy to the rest of y'all.
__________________
Star Metallurgist of the Roy Fanclub

Who made my awesome Dwarf Hexblade avatar, you ask? BRC did!
Spoiler
Amphetryon is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:19 PM   Top  -  End  -  #176
true_shinken
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajadea View Post
Really? Because I swear Shen the Masked Dragon is using Able Learner with an interpretation of 'every single skill ever is your class skill'...
Except that rule is not like that on 3.5

Quote:
Originally Posted by SRD
Skills

If a skill is a class skill for any of a multiclass character’s classes, then character level determines a skill’s maximum rank. (The maximum rank for a class skill is 3 + character level.)

If a skill is not a class skill for any of a multiclass character’s classes, the maximum rank for that skill is one-half the maximum for a class skill.
Emphasis mine.
true_shinken is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:22 PM   Top  -  End  -  #177
The Vorpal Tribble
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 
The Mindfields
Gender: Female
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

*snrks cryptically*


Anyways, I can understand for most classes the problem with using less or equal levels of an alternative class than the secret ingredient (I felt similar pangs judging the last), however, in a build like Master of Masks where there is little improvement with added levels, mainly just more options, I can see where there really isn't all that much need to go the full 10.

Once you get the masks you want that blends best with the rest of the build you might as well say it capped at the point of usefulness as there really is no 'cap' to Master of Masks. No comfortable 'I've graduated' moment. Beyond that you're throwing in levels simply to coincide with the contest, not because it improves the strength or elegance or even creativity.

As well, many PrC's end at levels lower than 10. If the challenge included one of those that only went 5 levels, or, heck 3 levels in a few cases, how would you work that out?
The Vorpal Tribble is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:24 PM   Top  -  End  -  #178
Private-Prinny
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by true_shinken View Post
Except that rule is not like that on 3.5


Emphasis mine.
Except Able Learner doesn't make anything a class skill. If it was cross-class, it has the cross-class rank cap, but the ranks only cost 1 skill point each.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Private-Prinny is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:27 PM   Top  -  End  -  #179
arguskos
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vorpal Tribble View Post
Anyways, I can understand for most classes the problem with using less or equal levels of an alternative class than the secret ingredient (I felt similar pangs judging the last), however, in a build like Master of Masks where there is little improvement with added levels, mainly just more options, I can see where there really isn't all that much need to go the full 10.
Except that many masks upgrade the longer you take Master of Masks. You get more spells, more bonuses, etc.

I mean, it'd be like going on to Iron Chef America, getting a secret ingredient like, say, an entire pig, and ignoring half the pig. Yeah, you CAN, but it's not very classy.

Quote:
As well, many PrC's end at levels lower than 10. If the challenge included one of those that only went 5 levels, or, heck 3 levels in a few cases, how would you work that out?
Honestly, not really sure. Probably wouldn't consider such in my rubric in that case, since it'd be highly unfair. I WOULD however heavily advise against using a non 10-level PrC as the ingredient in one of these challenges. 5 or 3 levels are not enough to really build around. It'd be like trying to build around, say, Fist of the Forest. There's not much there to build around really. That's just me though.
arguskos is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:33 PM   Top  -  End  -  #180
true_shinken
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Gender: Male
Default Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge VI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Private-Prinny View Post
Except Able Learner doesn't make anything a class skill. If it was cross-class, it has the cross-class rank cap, but the ranks only cost 1 skill point each.
I get Perform from Draconic Heritage: battle dragon. You guys missed on that.
true_shinken is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.