2/28/2013 - Update on Thumb
12/31/2012 - There's a New Comic
12/12/2012 - The "Lost" Holiday Ornament (and Child's Play)
11/26/2012 - Leftover OOTS Swag on Sale (+Thumb Report)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 889 Get Real
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com!
RSS Feeds: OOTS

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew
Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 



Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Gaming > Roleplaying Games > D&D 3e/3.5e/d20
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

D&D 3e/3.5e/d20 The forum for conversations specifically related to the rules and procedures of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition, 3.5 Edition, or any fantasy game using the d20 system or a variant thereof (commercially published or not).

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2012, 11:23 AM   Top  -  End  -  #631
killem2
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

RE 327: Thanks, you answered my question. I was just playing through an encounter for my next session which is part of the Age of Worms, and because encounter is a bit below them for the level, I was scaling a necromancer up to level 7, and thus giving him the fear spell. However the encounter has 4x zombie bug bears (6hd), which on an average roll could be effected quite easily by our cleric. However, the room is quite small and very compact, so a 30ft cone for fear could dang near hit the entire party if they posistion theirselves just right for the wizard.


I just didn't know if the turns were like this:

Some Player
Some Player
Cleric
Some Player
Some Player
Evil Wizard


and the cleric scored high enough to turn some of then undead to be feared, when the wizard cast fear in that same turn, I didn't know when it came around to the cleric again, that his inital turn attempt, (for a lack of better words her), would go off again.

See I always though turning was like a holy act that once started it just pulsating again from the source of the cleric until the number of rounds possible was over.

So with that assumption, I thought we would have a case of a cleric who is actively turning undead, albeit a little recklessly, as he is now feared running away.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotterdammerung View Post
I weep for all the GM's and players who come here for help and instead get taught how to be prejudice towards classes. D&D is supposed to be a game that plunges you into a world of imagination and instead people around the world are standing around a table arguing over "tiers".
killem2 is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 03:34 PM   Top  -  End  -  #632
Khedrac
Orc in the Playground
 
PaladinGuy
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 
UK
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A330
If your mount's change move is double base move (there are exceptions) then the total distance moved on a ride-by attack is double the base movement. Since the initial attack has to be a charge the movement before the attack must be at least 10', so as you calculate the maximum distance after the charge is double base movement -10'.

A331
Yes

One note on charging and ride-by attack. In 3.0 you did not have to charge to the closest square to attack the opponent form making ride-by attacks much easier. With 3.5 a lot of the time they will not happen (barring house-rule) because the opponent is in the way. To use your "chess notation" (assume a small rider on a medium mount for ease of squares):
If you are at A1 and your opponent is as A5 the closest square from which you can attack your opponent is A4 (or A3 with reach). Continuing the line of the charge you get to A5 which is blocked.
You cannot charge to B4 (or B3) to carry on charging past as it is not the closest square from which you can attack.
Khedrac is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 11:20 PM   Top  -  End  -  #633
deuxhero
Troll in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 
Fl-24
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khedrac View Post
A330
If your mount's change move is double base move (there are exceptions)
Q335

Other than zombies and similar one action per turn creatures, does anything else has a charge speed other than double base move?
deuxhero is offline  
Old 06-26-2012, 11:27 PM   Top  -  End  -  #634
Kuulvheysoon
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: 
The Great White North
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
A 318

As Winged Creature (Savage Species, page 138) is an inherited template, it likely will not be of use to a character who has the dragonblood subtype. The Improved Flight feat (Races of the Wild, page 151) is the most straightforward solution; it grants +1 maneuverability category. For temporary improvements the Aerial Alacrity alacrity spell, available via the Sky Clerical domain (Races of the Wild, page 174), will improve maneuverability by 1 step. Mastery of the Sky (same domain) grants perfect maneuverability for its duration. The spells Wings of Air (Spell Compendium, page 240) improves maneuverability by 1 step, and Greater Wings of Air (same page) improves maneuverability by 2 steps.
A 318 Addendum

The Draconomicon introduced two items based in the (Greater) Wings of Air series; the (Improved) Pectoral of Maneuverability. 12k for the regular, 90k for the Improved.

I usually find that it's easier to buy items than it is to buy feats.

Last edited by Kuulvheysoon : 06-26-2012 at 11:27 PM.
Kuulvheysoon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 02:10 AM   Top  -  End  -  #635
Gnome Alone
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: 
Cat Food Island
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q336 Does anyone know if the Iron Bands of Bilaro / Binding can be escaped by changing size categories? I guess it amounts to how magical are they; do the bands simply change size to accommodate yours? And secondly, is a victim trapped in them subject to a coup de bras grace?
__________________
Creator of the Thogaturge.
Avatar by the one and only Ceika.
"I'll be whatever I wanna do." - Philip J. Fry

Last edited by Gnome Alone : 06-30-2012 at 12:54 AM. Reason: Hatred of auto-correct, evidence of the incompetence of which I have left in the original
Gnome Alone is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 02:15 AM   Top  -  End  -  #636
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 335

A level 16 Barbarian with the Streetfighter alternative class feature can move up to 4x their land speed (rather than 2x) with a charge.

A 336 No.
Quote:
The creature can break (and ruin) the bands with a DC 30 Strength check or escape them with a DC 30 Escape Artist check.
These are the only two listed ways of getting out of the Iron Bands. Changing shape may better allow success in one of these two ways, but it does not directly permit escape.

Held immobile is not designated as being helpless. Only helpless characters are subject to coup de grace attacks.

Last edited by Curmudgeon : 06-27-2012 at 02:23 AM.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 03:52 AM   Top  -  End  -  #637
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnome Alone View Post
Q336 Does anyone know if the Iron Bands of Bilaro / Binding can be escaped by changing size categories? I guess it amounts to how magical are they; do the bands simply change size to accommodate yours? And secondly, is a victim trapped in them subject to a coup de bras?
It's pretty standard for magic items to change size/shape as necessary to fit anyone who might want to wear them; it makes a fair bit of sense to assume that the Iron Bands are an offensive application of the principles involved. Changing size probably isn't sufficient to get out of them; if your character can turn his entire body to liquid or something it'd be harder for the DM to justify saying that you remain trapped, but ultimately there isn't usually any RAW for such corner cases, so it'd have to be negotiated.
willpell is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 04:00 AM   Top  -  End  -  #638
Kaww
Barbarian in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q337

Is "Maiming" weapon property (MIC 38) negated by fortification effects (DMG 219)?
__________________
Regards! Avatar by half-halfling, more of his avatars
Spoiler

How to attract players [GM guide]

My horror session
Kaww is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 05:48 AM   Top  -  End  -  #639
OMG PONIES
Ettin in the Playground
 
WolfInSheepsClothing
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q338: Can a spirit shaman (CD, pg 14) reap the benefits of the Swanmay's (BoED, pg 76) spellcasting and wild empathy advancement? These two class features specifically call out "druid or ranger levels" in the text, but I often see Swanmay referenced as a helpful PrC for spirit shamans.

Q339: Can a swanmay benefit from feats/PrCs/etc that require Wild Shape? In the description of their shifting class feature it says that it is identical to wild shape, except they can only take the form of a swan. Could a swanmay take, say, Natural Spell?

Q3340: Does a Swanmay's Shifting allow them to qualify for feats like Flyby Attack that require a fly speed (since her swan form has a fly speed)?
__________________
ON VACATION 5/23-5/31. Posting may be slow or nonexistent until the first week in June, but I'm still around.

The Iron Chef Optimization Hall of Heroes

Unofficial Iron Chef Optimization Old Head and Archivist

Last edited by OMG PONIES : 06-27-2012 at 07:48 AM.
OMG PONIES is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 06:11 AM   Top  -  End  -  #640
Khedrac
Orc in the Playground
 
PaladinGuy
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 
UK
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A335 part 2
An entity with WildShape and the Cheetah's Stride feat can move 10 times its base movement as part of a charge.

Other examples probably exist, hence my caveat to the original answer
Khedrac is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 07:58 AM   Top  -  End  -  #641
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 337 Yes.

If the critical hit is negated, any weapon property dependent on a critical hit cannot function normally. The enhancement description would need a specific exception, such as the following example (from desiccating).
Quote:
(This effect activates even if the target is not normally vulnerable to extra damage from critical hits.)
Maiming does not have such an exception.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:26 AM   Top  -  End  -  #642
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q341
Do skill synergy bonuses stack with each other? For instance, Bluff 5 and Sense Motive 5 each give +2 to Diplomacy, so does having both give +4? The bonuses aren't actually named "synergy bonus" as far as I can see, and I'm not clear on whether they would count as "the same source". I'm fairly sure that they stack but would like to get it confirmed.
willpell is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:47 AM   Top  -  End  -  #643
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 341 Yes.

"Synergy" is not a type of bonus in 3.5 D&D; it's merely a categorization term for these untyped bonuses. All such bonuses from different sources (different skills) stack.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:57 AM   Top  -  End  -  #644
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q342
The Book of Exalted Deeds feat "Holy Ki Strike" lists a prerequisite of "Ki Strike (holy)". Does such a thing actually exist? According to the PHB, Ki Strike comes only in Magic, Lawful, and Adamantine depending on level. Is this a misprint or is there something out there for Good monks which turns their Ki Strike into a Holy version?
willpell is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 09:25 AM   Top  -  End  -  #645
Roguenewb
Barbarian in the Playground
 
SwashbucklerGuy
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q343: Multi-parter:
A.) Can I craft magic items using metamagiced spells? Can I make a wand of quickened magic weapon? Is it different if I cast the quickened magic weapon using DMM: Quicken? How much does it cost? Can I make a wondrous item using quickened magic weapon as the base? Once, again, is it different if I use DMM, or am a tenth level incantatrix? Scrolls? Staves? And so on...

B.) If I make a scroll of Arcane Fusion, when are the spells inside it chosen?
Roguenewb is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:15 AM   Top  -  End  -  #646
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 342

No, Ki Strke (holy) doesn't exist. You'll have to ask your individual DM for an erratum (perhaps Ki Strike (magic)), because the WotC Errata file for BoED doesn't supply a correction for this.

A 343 A)

Yes, you can make spell trigger and spell completion items with metamagic-applied spells. The adjusted spell level must comply with the limits of the item creation feat. Since Magic Weapon is a 1st level spell and Quicken Spell adjusts the spell by +4 levels, no such wand (limited to 4th level spells) is possible. It doesn't matter what mechanism you use to supply the metamagic feats. Divine Metamagic only keeps the spell level unaltered for your spells, not to spells in items you create. The same applies to Incantatrix class abilities and other metamagic cost reducers: they do not apply to spell levels in items unless that's explicitly stated.

Wondrous items follow the listed formulas in all particulars. If you wish a different formula you're making a custom magic item, and the determination of how (and whether) you can make such a custom item is up to each individual DM.

A 343 B)
Quote:
When you cast this spell, choose any 1st-level sorcerer spell you know and any 4th-level or lower sorcerer spell you know.
A scroll user completes the casting of a spell, so Arcane Fusion works only with Sorcerer spells that the scroll user knows at the time of casting.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:20 AM   Top  -  End  -  #647
Roguenewb
Barbarian in the Playground
 
SwashbucklerGuy
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q343: Clarification: Can I exceed my spell level limit on wondrous items? Can I make a pocket watch of quickened time stop and craft as if its a 13th level spell?

Can a wizard UMD a scroll of Arcane Fusion, and put two Sorc/Wiz spells inside it?

Last edited by Roguenewb : 06-27-2012 at 10:22 AM.
Roguenewb is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 11:04 AM   Top  -  End  -  #648
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
A 342
A 343 A)
Since Magic Weapon is a 1st level spell and Quicken Spell adjusts the spell by +4 levels, no such wand (limited to 4th level spells) is possible.
So...replace Quicken Spell with Quicken Power and "wand" with "dorje"...does it work now?
willpell is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 12:33 PM   Top  -  End  -  #649
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 343 Clarification

I have no idea what a "pocket watch of quickened time stop" is. All custom magic item decisions are made by your individual DM. In general, you must be able to supply the item creation feat and all the spells and materials required for any such item. The way you achieve spells above 9th level normally is through instances of the Improved Spell Capacity [Epic] feat.

No, a Wizard cannot "UMD a scroll of Arcane Fusion, and put two Sorc/Wiz spells inside it". As I explained, the user of a scroll of Arcane Fusion is the caster of the spell. Only the caster, not the scroll scriber, is relevant to the Sorcerer spells required by Arcane Fusion. The scroll scriber doesn't "put spells inside" other than Arcane Fusion itself. The scroll reader must know the required Sorcerer spells, or Arcane Fusion will do nothing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willpell View Post
So...replace Quicken Spell with Quicken Power and "wand" with "dorje"...does it work now?
No.

Last edited by Curmudgeon : 06-27-2012 at 12:37 PM.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 12:36 PM   Top  -  End  -  #650
Ketiara
Dwarf in the Playground
 
Zombie
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Gender: Male
smile Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q344
I play a crusader and im a about to dip into warblade, my question is how do I use my manoeuvre cards to manage my crusader8/warblade1.
Do I have two different recovery methods one that recoveres my maneuvres as a crusader AND one for my warblade or do I decide wich recovery method I like best and use that or will I have to use the warblade method now that warblade is the moste recent class ive picked?
And how many maneuvres do I have now? 5 from my crusader + 3 from my warblade totaling 8 or do I only have 3 or do I still have 5?

Hope its not too stupid a question, and that you can clear it up for me
Ketiara is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 12:42 PM   Top  -  End  -  #651
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 344

Yes, you have two different recovery methods, because maneuvers are tracked separately for your manifesting classes. You only use the recovery method relevant to the class for which you have readied and expended a maneuver. That also means you have separate lists of maneuvers available and readied.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 12:43 PM   Top  -  End  -  #652
TheOasysMaster
Ettin in the Playground
 
RedWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 
Brampton, Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q345
Does Hide from Undead protect from magical means of detection? Detect Magic, Detect Evil, and more specifically, Deathwatch?

Does this abjuration also ward the creature's active spells, items and their life force?
TheOasysMaster is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 01:07 PM   Top  -  End  -  #653
Curmudgeon
Titan in the Playground
 
AssassinGuy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 
Sunnydale
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 345 Some.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hide from Undead
Undead cannot see, hear, or smell the warded creatures. Even extraordinary or supernatural sensory capabilities, such as blindsense, blindsight, scent, and tremorsense, cannot detect or locate warded creatures.
There is no protection from detection magic except where that magic uses the sensory capabilities specifically mentioned in the spell. For instance, Detect Evil does not specify that it uses sight/hearing/smell ... to sense Evil, and Hide from Undead will therefore not prevent an undead spellcaster from finding the warded character. Deathwatch uses "foul sight", and sight is blocked.

Hide from Undead's protection extends to the creature's attended items, as usual. It does not provide any protection to spell detection except through the specified senses. Thus Arcane Sight will be blocked (since it uses sight, which Hide from Undead overrides for the warded creature), but Detect Magic will not be blocked (since it merely "detects" without specifying any specific sense used). The Lifesense feat and Goggles of Lifesight will also be blocked, because both use the eyes for detection.
Curmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 03:13 PM   Top  -  End  -  #654
Andezzar
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q 346

Are there any repercussions for an arcane caster to cast a spell with an alignment descriptor other than his own alignment? For example a chaotic good wizard using summon monster to summon a devil.
Andezzar is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 03:16 PM   Top  -  End  -  #655
ahenobarbi
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Kobold
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q 347
A character with BAB 3 alter selfs into troglodyte and gets 3 naturall attacks (2 claws and bite). What attacks will the character perform as full-attack action if:
a) It uses shield
b) It uses morning star
c) It uses both
and with what bonuses?

Last edited by ahenobarbi : 06-27-2012 at 03:16 PM.
ahenobarbi is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 03:18 PM   Top  -  End  -  #656
ahenobarbi
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Kobold
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A 346

No mechanical effect. It could affect alignment and after life, but it's up to DM (some books introduce systems for tracking aligned deeds and how this affects afterlife).
ahenobarbi is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 06:20 PM   Top  -  End  -  #657
Urpriest
Ettin in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 
Stony Brook
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahenobarbi View Post
Q 347
A character with BAB 3 alter selfs into troglodyte and gets 3 naturall attacks (2 claws and bite). What attacks will the character perform as full-attack action if:
a) It uses shield
b) It uses morning star
c) It uses both
and with what bonuses?
A 347
Note that a troglodyte has Multiattack as a racial bonus feat.
a) Claw +3/Bite +1, assuming the character does not use other weapons
b) Morningstar +3/Claw +1/Bite +1
c) Morningstar +3/Bite +1
__________________
Lord Raziere herd I like Blasphemy, so Urpriest Exalted as a Malefactor

Meet My Monstrous Guide to Monsters. Everything you absolutely need to know about Monsters and never thought you needed to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
One of the unwritten rules of Giantitp is that Urpriest is always right.
Trophy!
Spoiler
Urpriest is offline  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:15 PM   Top  -  End  -  #658
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
A 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by willpell View Post
So...replace Quicken Spell with Quicken Power and "wand" with "dorje"...does it work now?
No.
Not too surprised that's the answer, but could you clarify why exactly? Is it because Quicken Power requires you to expend a psionic focus? In that case, why precisely can the dorje's user not spend his own focus to make the dorje function?
willpell is offline  
Old 06-28-2012, 02:17 AM   Top  -  End  -  #659
ben-zayb
Barbarian in the Playground
 
PirateCaptain
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 
material & internet plane
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

Q348
Swarms of Fine and Diminutive size are Immune to Weapon Damage, but are they immune to being hit, such that a maneuver that only requires that its target be hit still will trigger its effects? And can someone with Robilar's Gambit, who Shapechange-d to a Swarm, revert back to his normal form (as a free action) and make an AoO after being hit by an enemy, while still not taking damage due to previous immunity?
ben-zayb is offline  
Old 06-28-2012, 06:08 AM   Top  -  End  -  #660
Khedrac
Orc in the Playground
 
PaladinGuy
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 
UK
Gender: Male
Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXI

A348
1. The are immune to damage from a weapon strike - this will cover most (if not all) ToB:Bot9S manoeuvers,
2. Energy effects on a weapon (eg sword +1 flaming - the flaming part). They are immune to this too (houserules may vary) so any Desert Wind strike that does not cause AoE damage is also ignored.
3. No - you don't threaten as a swarm and you can only make attacks of opportunity on oppenents you threaten.
Khedrac is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.