6/4/2013 - Free Wallpaper (and Mini Release)
5/29/2013 - Important: GiantITP Server Compromised
2/28/2013 - Update on Thumb
12/31/2012 - There's a New Comic
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 894 The Last Room
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com!
RSS Feeds: OOTS

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew
The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew
Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 



Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Comics > The Order of the Stick
Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

The Order of the Stick A forum for discussion of Rich Burlew's stick figure fantasy webcomic.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2012, 01:37 AM   Top  -  End  -  #511
raymundo
Dwarf in the Playground
 
HalflingRangerGuy
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 
Germany
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

I don't know if this is still debated, but the spell did work. Belkar stopped stabbing him (I mean, this alone should be proof enough something manipulated him) and his eyes were all swirly.

The only question remaining is: If Nale utters another command after they regain hearing, will it count as a Suggestion? Rules say no, apparently, but it might be a neat twist. Though it won't happen, seeing as several people have already pointed it out and the Giant will just start his reality warping machine to make the story be something else anyway.
__________________
Interested in playing Magic: The Gathering via Cockatrice?
Spoiler
raymundo is online now  
Old 08-18-2012, 02:11 AM   Top  -  End  -  #512
EmperorSarda
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 
USA
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by raymundo View Post
I don't know if this is still debated, but the spell did work. Belkar stopped stabbing him (I mean, this alone should be proof enough something manipulated him) and his eyes were all swirly.
Except Belkar stabbed Nale in the foot and in the last panel there are a couple of slashes. So no, Belkar didn't stop attacking Nale.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berserk Monk View Post
Every time Miko smiles, an angel commits suicide.
CATNIP FOR THE CAT GOD!!! YARN FOR THE YARN THRONE!!! MILK FOR THE MILK BOWL!!!
EmperorSarda is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 02:25 AM   Top  -  End  -  #513
raymundo
Dwarf in the Playground
 
HalflingRangerGuy
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 
Germany
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by EmperorSarda View Post
Except Belkar stabbed Nale in the foot and in the last panel there are a couple of slashes. So no, Belkar didn't stop attacking Nale.
Well.. I never claimed he didn't proceed the stabby goodness ;) I was talking about panels 10 and 11, Belkar stopped stabbing without any good reason (and actually seems to have been knocked back).

Well, there probably is a point in saying it was Nale's round and that is why he didn't keep stabbin'.
__________________
Interested in playing Magic: The Gathering via Cockatrice?
Spoiler
raymundo is online now  
Old 08-18-2012, 08:53 AM   Top  -  End  -  #514
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

I hope to see this exchange after the Linear Guild is mopped up:

"Good work, Belkar!"
"Wow, Roy, I don't think you've ever said that."
"And I probably never will again, so enjoy it like it's your last birthday cake."
willpell is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 10:56 AM   Top  -  End  -  #515
FujinAkari
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpacemanSpif View Post
C) Breaks the rules/inserts house rules to make the comic funny.

Exhibit A: http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0352.html, and the following panel, http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0353.html
I'm pretty sure that is a documented case where Rich forgot the specifics of Control Weather, then had to explain it in the next comic after the forums exploded.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raymundo View Post
"extremely specific", "small rule" is kinda subjective.

But you do think Belkar still being "open for Suggestions" after he re-gained his hearing would blatantly violate the rules? Or did I get that backwards?
Yes, the wording of Suggestion very clearly states only a single suggestion can be made, and the comic has already abided by that back when V used it on the YBD.
__________________
Official Incense Aroma Specialist for the Vaarsuvius Fan Club!

English isn't my primary language, so please let me know if something I'm saying doesn't make sense!
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
Thank you, FujinAkari.
ThePhantasm's awesometacular post
FujinAkari is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 11:06 AM   Top  -  End  -  #516
Kish
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Rich has always been very blunt about having no interest in the strict letter of D&D rules. He did not "have to" explain anything, he chose to have Thor announce a similar disregard for said rules.

(And there is certainly no indication anywhere that Rich "forgot" the specifics of Control Weather.)

Yes, people on the forums complain whenever anything he does isn't obviously from a D&D book. His response to this started at "I bend the rules when it makes it funny. Accept." very, very early indeed (before strip #50), and has only gotten less conciliatory since then.
__________________
Spoiler

Last edited by Kish : 08-18-2012 at 11:23 AM.
Kish is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 07:59 PM   Top  -  End  -  #517
whiteboar
Pixie in the Playground
 
SamuraiGuy
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DougTheHead View Post
Sorry, but that sounds like an awesome game, and I would buy it immediately if it came out.

For what it's worth, I don't think the previous poster was impugning your motives or saying that you didn't want to have fun. He was simply pointing out that in this instance, the desire for historical accuracy would necessarily make the game less fun. The same could be said about any damage model that wanted to realistically depict the way wounds affect people- if you used a realistic damage model, everyone in both parties would be incapacitated or dying within two rounds, and would need to rest for about a month to recover from their wounds, making rolls against infection every day. I doubt most people would find this realistic system as fun as the current one.

We actually had that game system. It was TSR's spy game, Top Secret and it blew worse than anything I ever played. It would take an eternity to run a firefight and everyone would die.
whiteboar is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 10:00 PM   Top  -  End  -  #518
SpacemanSpif
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: May 2008
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by FujinAkari View Post
I'm pretty sure that is a documented case where Rich forgot the specifics of Control Weather, then had to explain it in the next comic after the forums exploded.
While it's perhaps feasible that Rich forgot that Control Weather specifically couldn't cause lightning to strike, it is beyond feasible that he would "forget" that Control Weather can't make a thunder shockwave powerful enough to destroy all those Treants, and yet somehow focused enough that it doesn't destroy any of the commoners in the city, or visibly damage the characters right next to them.

I'll concede that the comic sticks to the rules most of the time; that's clearly true. But it is also true that the rules will not be thrown by the wayside if Rich thinks it'll make for a better joke or story.

Edit: Whoops, funny how one word will reverse the meaning of a sentence.

Last edited by SpacemanSpif : 08-18-2012 at 11:28 PM.
SpacemanSpif is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 10:02 PM   Top  -  End  -  #519
Spiral159
Ghost in the Playground
 
Chimera
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Question: if a GM wanted to go a campaign based off OoTS, would there be two teams of PCs? One for the Order and the other for the Guild, and the GM plays Xykon and everyone else? Or would there only be one team of players controlling the Order while the GM handles everyone else?
Spiral159 is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 10:29 PM   Top  -  End  -  #520
FujinAkari
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpacemanSpif View Post
I'll concede that the comic sticks to the rules most of the time; that's clearly true. But it is also true that the rules will not be thrown by the wayside if Rich thinks it'll make for a better joke or story.
Yes? Such a point was never in contention...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiral159 View Post
Question: if a GM wanted to go a campaign based off OoTS, would there be two teams of PCs? One for the Order and the other for the Guild, and the GM plays Xykon and everyone else? Or would there only be one team of players controlling the Order while the GM handles everyone else?
The order are the only PCs, the Linear Guild are NPCs without question.
__________________
Official Incense Aroma Specialist for the Vaarsuvius Fan Club!

English isn't my primary language, so please let me know if something I'm saying doesn't make sense!
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
Thank you, FujinAkari.
ThePhantasm's awesometacular post

Last edited by FujinAkari : 08-18-2012 at 10:34 PM.
FujinAkari is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 11:17 PM   Top  -  End  -  #521
Kish
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiral159 View Post
Question: if a GM wanted to go a campaign based off OoTS, would there be two teams of PCs? One for the Order and the other for the Guild, and the GM plays Xykon and everyone else? Or would there only be one team of players controlling the Order while the GM handles everyone else?
"When it comes to being tagonists, we're more 'an,'"...

Why would you think the group of evil twins who literally exist for nothing but to oppose the strip's protagonists would be PCs?
__________________
Spoiler
Kish is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 11:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #522
stsasser
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kish View Post
"When it comes to being tagonists, we're more 'an,'"...

Why would you think the group of evil twins who literally exist for nothing but to oppose the strip's protagonists would be PCs?
Other than the fact it would be fiendishly complicated and time-consuming, (the sessions would have to be segregated until one party encountered another,) why not?

In fact, why not have three parties of PC's by throwing in Team Evil?
stsasser is offline  
Old 08-18-2012, 11:52 PM   Top  -  End  -  #523
ti'esar
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Lizardfolk
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by stsasser View Post
Other than the fact it would be fiendishly complicated and time-consuming, (the sessions would have to be segregated until one party encountered another,) why not?

In fact, why not have three parties of PC's by throwing in Team Evil?
If you actually think running PC-versus-PC combat is a good idea...

Well, make sure to tell us how it goes.
ti'esar is offline  
Old 08-19-2012, 12:33 AM   Top  -  End  -  #524
Warren Dew
Bugbear in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiral159 View Post
Question: if a GM wanted to go a campaign based off OoTS, would there be two teams of PCs? One for the Order and the other for the Guild, and the GM plays Xykon and everyone else? Or would there only be one team of players controlling the Order while the GM handles everyone else?
I think it would be up to the gamesmaster, but the way the comic is written, the Linear Guild seems more composed of NPCs to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ti'esar View Post
If you actually think running PC-versus-PC combat is a good idea...

Well, make sure to tell us how it goes.
Speaking from some limited experience, it can be very interesting, but the players don't tend to care for it.
__________________
My FRP campaign
Warren Dew is offline  
Old 08-19-2012, 06:04 AM   Top  -  End  -  #525
DreamingDragon
Pixie in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Consider that the Creator of any work like this,a long narritive story with many subweaving plots,is ultimately a Reporter,and "what happens" IS what happens as the story unfolds.In that This Creator uses the Dungeons and Dragons rules system as a mechanic to govern what can happen within the confines of the World ,and as a long time DnD'er it works well and wonderfully. But its only a reference point,not the world's immutable law.

The Law is ever the Story. What the Story demands,it gets. How un DnD can you get with a Quasi-Elemental Plane of Ranch Dressing? Unless it was in the Abyss or whatever the Chaotic Neutral plane was...But it fit right in!
I tend to agree in his interpretation of the rules when it comes to composing the comic,but the debates they inspire amuse me more!But...let the show go on...
DreamingDragon is offline  
Old 08-19-2012, 10:11 AM   Top  -  End  -  #526
lio45
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by ti'esar View Post
Well, make sure to tell us how it goes.
FWIW, he did already: "fiendishly complicated and time-consuming".

Unless your players have got all the time in the world AND love it when things are complicated, no, it's not a good idea to run PC vs PC combat.

So, we all agree on this...
__________________
95 K1500 Z71 XCSB 6.5 4L80-E
lio45 is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 12:03 PM   Top  -  End  -  #527
ManuelSacha
Dwarf in the Playground
 
BlackDragon
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Default Re: Did Nale hear Sabine say she loves him forever?

I think it's just a faint echo of her voice while she faints away.
The effect isn't there to indicate telepathy.
So no, the poor bastard didn't hear it.
ManuelSacha is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 12:12 PM   Top  -  End  -  #528
kickassfrog
Dwarf in the Playground
 
GreenSorcererElf
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Default Re: Did Nale hear Sabine say she loves him forever?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
It's possible, if Nale thinks back on the event later when he gets a more quiet moment, that he could puzzle out what her lips were saying.

But perhaps I'm being a bit too charitable. After all, I can't wait for the entire LG to kick the bucket.
Agreed. Especially Nale.

OT, I agree with most of the people in the thread, it was probably just a whisper or an echo.
She may remember she had telepathy later as a throwaway gag.
kickassfrog is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 12:17 PM   Top  -  End  -  #529
Kalrany
Dwarf in the Playground
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 
Earth
Gender: Female
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45 View Post
FWIW, he did already: "fiendishly complicated and time-consuming".

Unless your players have got all the time in the world AND love it when things are complicated, no, it's not a good idea to run PC vs PC combat.

So, we all agree on this...
I actually played a game where PC v PC happend: it was no more complicated than the other combat senerios that we encountered. And it was run seperatly until the storylines overlapped. And then we spent several hours trying to destroy eachother. It was messy, but a lot of fun. You really have to have a good DM and need to trust them, though.

It takes forwever to read 17 pages of comments. Aweoms comic -- laughed a lot. :)
__________________
78% of all DM's start their first campaign in a tavern. If you're among the 22% who didn't, copy and paste this into your signature and tell us where you DID begin.The players were attacked individually on the road on the way to town by werewolves. To survive, they had to team up then and there without knowing anything about eachother (literally -- all character sheets were completed without other players' knowledge).
Kalrany is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:45 PM   Top  -  End  -  #530
Incom
Orc in the Playground
 
OldWizardGuy
 
Join Date: May 2011
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Aren't the party that invaded the LG afterlife PCs? They did mention XP...

Someone should have spent money and got their story told for the Kickstarter.
__________________
SSBitP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craft (Cheese) View Post
"Creativity is the art of knowing how to hide one's sources." - Original quote, DO NOT STEAL.
Incom is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:03 PM   Top  -  End  -  #531
Kish
Titan in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incom View Post
Aren't the party that invaded the LG afterlife PCs? They did mention XP...
Where do you get the idea that caring about XP is a trait limited to PCs?*

*In the no-fourth-wall world of OotS, of course. In anything with a fourth wall, there's no such concept as XP.
__________________
Spoiler
Kish is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:32 PM   Top  -  End  -  #532
MDay15
Pixie in the Playground
 
Goblin
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Yes, the wording of Suggestion very clearly states only a single suggestion can be made, and the comic has already abided by that back when V used it on the YBD.
No; V ordered it to stop attacking, then vomit on Belkar, then communicate with the rest of the OOTS.
MDay15 is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:36 PM   Top  -  End  -  #533
Peelee
Barbarian in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 
Birmingham, AL
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDay15 View Post
No; V ordered it to stop attacking, then vomit on Belkar, then communicate with the rest of the OOTS.
No, V suggested that he perform no actions except those which she explicitly ordered of him. All other orders were covered under the original (and sole) suggestion.
__________________
DZ-4049 in the 501st Legion!

Silver Dragon avatar by the awesome Cuthalion!

Last edited by Peelee : 08-20-2012 at 03:37 PM.
Peelee is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 05:51 PM   Top  -  End  -  #534
AbuSpud
Pixie in the Playground
 
EvilClericGuy
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peelee View Post
No, V suggested that he perform no actions except those which she explicitly ordered of him. All other orders were covered under the original (and sole) suggestion.
No fair! Denied under the "no wishing for more wishes" clause!
AbuSpud is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 09:00 PM   Top  -  End  -  #535
Water_Bear
Bugbear in the Playground
 
BlueKnightGuy
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: 
NY, USA
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbuSpud View Post
No fair! Denied under the "no wishing for more wishes" clause!
No such rule in D&D 3.5. You can Wish for a Candle of Invocation, use it to call up a Noble Djinn, and demand it give you three Wishes. Then make the third one for another Candle of Invocation. And that's just the most well known Wish Loop.

That said, as a DM I wouldn't let the Suggestion "Follow my orders" to fly, even if it was rules legal. Still, ultimately it's Rich's comic and there's no reason to think it wouldn't be rules legal even in a real game.

Last edited by Water_Bear : 08-20-2012 at 09:02 PM. Reason: Forgot an important sentence.
Water_Bear is online now  
Old 08-20-2012, 09:58 PM   Top  -  End  -  #536
Fitzclowningham
Barbarian in the Playground
 
BardGuy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 
LIC, NY
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

How does Nale know his father is talking in panel 4? Tarquin is wearing a helmet that covers his mouth and Nale can't hear him.
Fitzclowningham is offline  
Old 08-21-2012, 01:39 AM   Top  -  End  -  #537
factotum
Titan in the Playground
 
BlackDragon
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 
Manchester, UK
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzclowningham View Post
How does Nale know his father is talking in panel 4? Tarquin is wearing a helmet that covers his mouth and Nale can't hear him.
He might still have enough hearing left to tell somebody is speaking, just not enough to tell what they're saying.
factotum is offline  
Old 08-21-2012, 06:32 AM   Top  -  End  -  #538
Boogastreehouse
Orc in the Playground
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzclowningham View Post
How does Nale know his father is talking in panel 4? Tarquin is wearing a helmet that covers his mouth and Nale can't hear him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by factotum View Post
He might still have enough hearing left to tell somebody is speaking, just not enough to tell what they're saying.
"What? I can't hear you. Are you even—"

"—talking?"
__________________
2012 Kickstart Pledge Drive Backer# 12,851

Their: a possessive pronoun like “her” or “our”
There: refers to a place ("the Kobold is over THERE"), or to indicate the existence of something, or to mention something for the first time. ("THERE is a Halfling sneaking up on him")
They're: a contraction of “they are.”

Also: Your/You're, Its/It's, Then/Than.


And... I believe in you.

C fl epefggj cd gpyb hcex jpz.

Last edited by Boogastreehouse : 08-21-2012 at 06:33 AM.
Boogastreehouse is offline  
Old 08-21-2012, 06:35 AM   Top  -  End  -  #539
willpell
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogastreehouse View Post
Perhaps Nale saw Tarquin and Tarquin was moving in a way that suggested speech. Most people do some amount of gesturing (including things like angle of head or position of body, if their hands are full) in conjunction with speech.

Last edited by willpell : 08-21-2012 at 06:36 AM.
willpell is offline  
Old 08-21-2012, 07:49 AM   Top  -  End  -  #540
SaintRidley
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 
The land of corn
Default Re: OOTS #860 - The Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogastreehouse View Post
to me?

I think that would probably finish it off.
__________________
Spoiler
Fiction Editor for Bestfiction.org
SaintRidley is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.