2/18/2014 - End-of-Book Hiatus 12/20/2013 - Calendars On Their Way 11/26/2013 - Tenth Anniversary Calendar plus Ornaments, T-Shirts 9/29/2013 - Ten Years of OOTS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

 Order of the Stick 946 It's What's Inside That Counts Erfworld 163 The End of Book One Erfworld Now at Erfworld.com! RSS Feeds: OOTS

 The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

 The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew The New World, Part 8: Gnomes by Rich Burlew The New World, Part 7: Names and Cultures by Rich Burlew Looking for the Gaming Articles?

 Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.

 Giant in the Playground Forums Mathematics and precedence rules
 User Name Stay Logged On Password
 Register FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read End

 Friendly Banter Hellos, goodbyes, and other casual conversation goes here. Especially if it doesn't fit better into one of the other forums.

10-24-2012, 09:26 AM   Top  -  End  -  #121
Socratov
Ogre in the Playground

Join Date: May 2011
 Location: Below sea level
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by noparlpf I usually like zero. It means I can eliminate an entire piece of an equation, or reduce it to a one, or something. Except sometimes I hate zero. Like when the equation says ln(φ)=(1/RT)(integral from 0 to p (dp/p)). Because without that actually being explained in class, when you get to it on the homework it looks like you're supposed to have ln(0).
it's also the very reason why differentials are way more awesome then integreals (or worse: double, triple, circle, surface and volume integrals)
__________________

Debater of the Tyrion Lannister fanclub

“The gods help those who help themselves, and my word, didn't I help myself.” - Avatar by the awesome Grinner

Old avatars
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 10:27 AM   Top  -  End  -  #122
The Extinguisher
Troll in the Playground

Join Date: Mar 2006
 Location: 3 inches from yesterday
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Socratov that depends on you expecting the caculation in integers. For instance in integers it's the much awaited 4. However, to be overly correct one can assume that the '2's in the equation can be rounded numbers of anywhere between (for significance kept on 2 decimals) 1,50 and 2,49 this then results in a range of minimum 1,50+1,50=3,00 (or: 2+2=3 for minimal values of 2)and a maximum of 2,49+2,49=4,98 (or: 2+2=5 for maximal values of 2), resulting 2+2=y in a range of 3=
I'm pretty sure claiming that's not how rounding works. If you round 1.86 to 2, you're committing that value to be two later. If I have 1.86 and 2.43 and I add them, I get 4.29, but if I round them both to two and add them I get 4.
__________________

Thanks Uncle Festy for the wonderful Ashling Avatar
Quote:
 Originally Posted by The Extinguisher So the moral of this story is that you should never listen to me ever.

10-24-2012, 11:16 AM   Top  -  End  -  #123
Saposhiente
Barbarian in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2010
 Location: An SQL database
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by noparlpf "Even" means it can be divided by two and not yield a fraction. So technically zero is even, because 0/2=0 and zero isn't a fraction.
(Terminology nitpick: Zero is a fraction. 0/1. 0/42. So is every other number, 3/1, 6/2, etc. What it is is an integer multiple of 2, 2*0=0.) Pendell: Dividing by zero has nothing to do with it.
__________________

Technical Admin of the Minecraft server. Whitelist is here; put your name there and post it in the thread.
The overly long monstrosity that is my extended signature lies here.
Spoiler
Avatar by Akrim.elf

10-24-2012, 12:15 PM   Top  -  End  -  #124
noparlpf
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Mar 2011
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Saposhiente (Terminology nitpick: Zero is a fraction. 0/1. 0/42. So is every other number, 3/1, 6/2, etc. What it is is an integer multiple of 2, 2*0=0.) Pendell: Dividing by zero has nothing to do with it.
Eh, sort of. I don't consider n/1 a fraction. Not that it makes a difference, really.
__________________
Jude P.
.............................
Playing Pokémon X
3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
Four-31 IV Pokémon available for trade:
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 12:56 PM   Top  -  End  -  #125
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by noparlpf Eh, sort of. I don't consider n/1 a fraction. Not that it makes a difference, really.
Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

10-24-2012, 01:00 PM   Top  -  End  -  #126
noparlpf
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Mar 2011
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Heliomance Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really. And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
__________________
Jude P.
.............................
Playing Pokémon X
3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
Four-31 IV Pokémon available for trade:
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 01:20 PM   Top  -  End  -  #127
Castaras
Firbolg in the Playground

Join Date: Aug 2006
 Location: Leicester, UK
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

You can't figure out all the numbers of pi. It's irrational.

So the only way you can have pi as a fraction is pi/1.
__________________
"I'm just going on motive and opportunity here and the fact that if the earth got swallowed by a black hole, I'd look suspiciously in your direction first."
~ Timberwolf

"After the first day we universally agreed that she was banned from fire thereafter. The second day she ended up with the power to create 5 extra copies of herself."
~ Heliomance

"You're like Pinkie Pie powered by a nuclear reactor."
~ Lix Lorn

10-24-2012, 01:26 PM   Top  -  End  -  #128
Urpriest
Firbolg in the Playground

Join Date: Jul 2010
 Location: Stony Brook
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by noparlpf If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really. And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
__________________
Lord Raziere herd I like Blasphemy, so Urpriest Exalted as a Malefactor

Meet My Monstrous Guide to Monsters. Everything you absolutely need to know about Monsters and never thought you needed to ask.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf One of the unwritten rules of Giantitp is that Urpriest is always right.
Trophy!
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 01:48 PM   Top  -  End  -  #129
warty goblin
Firbolg in the Playground

Join Date: May 2007
 Location: Evil God of the Dorms
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ForzaFiori I can tell you roughly when the dark ages are, who the US's first president was, the name of the person that discovered america is
Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously.

Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
__________________
After the third complaint about the monster arm nailed to my door, I decided 'What Would Beowulf Do?' was not a good personal motto.
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 02:40 PM   Top  -  End  -  #130
noparlpf
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Mar 2011
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Urpriest Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
Okay, that's fair.
__________________
Jude P.
.............................
Playing Pokémon X
3DS friend code: 0705-3326-2027
Four-31 IV Pokémon available for trade:
Spoiler

10-24-2012, 07:53 PM   Top  -  End  -  #131
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

You can't figure out all the digits of pi because it never ends - it has infinitely many digits, and never starts repeating. There is no way to write pi as a fraction.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

10-24-2012, 08:01 PM   Top  -  End  -  #132
nedz
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Apr 2010
 Location: London
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by noparlpf
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Heliomance Your explanation would make pi even, because you don't get a fraction when you divide it by 2.
If 3/2 is a fraction then why isn't pi/2? Three is a constant, pi is a constant. Same thing, really.
You have answered a different question.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by noparlpf And anyway, if we figured out all the decimals of pi, we could very well turn it into proper fraction form, just with arbitrarily long numbers in the numerator and denominator.
This is never going to happen, π is irrational. The term irrational means that you can never write it down as a rational number. A rational number is one which can be written down as some P/Q where P and Q are integers. This has been proven, though IIRC the proof is a little subtle.
__________________
p = 4
Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.

Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

Avatar by Caravaggio

10-25-2012, 01:38 AM   Top  -  End  -  #133
Socratov
Ogre in the Playground

Join Date: May 2011
 Location: Below sea level
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by The Extinguisher I'm pretty sure claiming that's not how rounding works. If you round 1.86 to 2, you're committing that value to be two later. If I have 1.86 and 2.43 and I add them, I get 4.29, but if I round them both to two and add them I get 4.
well, rounding is only done in favor of less writing down (are you going to write every decimal? have fun with Pi) but that doesn't mean you can round off and calculate on with the rounded off numbers. You always continue with the non rounded numbers. I have been punished for not doing this in school (our teacher sometimes was slightly sadistic in making math tests like these). In maths acutally 2 things you need to know: 1) what is a function? (and how does it work and hwat can you do with it) 2)every numeral representation of a number is a range unless otherwise defined or reasoned.
__________________

Debater of the Tyrion Lannister fanclub

“The gods help those who help themselves, and my word, didn't I help myself.” - Avatar by the awesome Grinner

Old avatars
Spoiler

10-28-2012, 04:06 PM   Top  -  End  -  #134
Ashery
Dwarf in the Playground

Join Date: Feb 2010
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Urpriest Nope! 3/2 is a fraction (the actual term is a rational number) because 3 and 2 are integers. The fact that they're constants doesn't factor into it, p/q is also rational provided p and q are integers, even if they aren't constant. Integers are not arbitrarily long, either, since infinity is a limit, not a number.
Hurray, one explanation I don't have to do. Although the additional requirement that q≠0 needs to be added for the definition to be complete. Ie a rational number is defined as "p/q where p, q are integers and q≠0."

Now, for even/odd:

An even number is any integer that can be expressed as 2m, where m is any integer.

An odd number is any integer that can be expressed as 2m + 1, where m is any integer.

So, for the case of proving that odd + odd = even (To bastardize the language a bit), we have:

(2m + 1) + (2n + 1) = 2m + 2n + 2 = 2(m + n + 1) = 2k

The last "step" is unnecessary, but I figured it was better to play it safe and include it. It should be clear that k = m + n + 1 and we know k to be an integer because of the fact that integers are closed under addition.

Bit of a weak explanation, but meh.

Last edited by Ashery : 10-28-2012 at 04:08 PM.

10-28-2012, 06:02 PM   Top  -  End  -  #135
TheFallenOne
Titan in the Playground

Join Date: Dec 2005
 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by warty goblin Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously. Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages.

Lesson being: if you give some examples of basic facts you know, be sure everything you list is in fact accurate and not just a common misconception you picked up somewhere.
__________________
Not a member of the Bayesian Conspiracy. Honestly. Probably. Maybe.
Find your own priors!

Spoiler: PbP

10-28-2012, 07:21 PM   Top  -  End  -  #136
Mr.Silver
Ogre in the Playground

Join Date: Feb 2008
 Location: Earth
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by TheFallenOne Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages. Lesson being: if you give some examples of basic facts you know, be sure everything you list is in fact accurate and not just a common misconception you picked up somewhere.
Just to further beat this point into the ground: technically speaking, the line "who the US's first president was", is, on account of the wording, more accurately answered by 'John Hancock' than 'George Washington'*. The reason for this being that while Washington was the first person to hold the office of 'President of the United States of America', the US's first president (note lack of capital) would have been Hancock due to him being the president of the Continental Congress when independence was declared.

Pedantic? Yes, but it seemed fitting given the main topic of the thread

*There are other potential answers that can be argued for as well, but Hancock is probably the strongest option.

10-29-2012, 12:37 AM   Top  -  End  -  #137
Knaight
Firbolg in the Playground

Join Date: Aug 2008
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by warty goblin Probably not, actually. Columbus was about four hundred years after Leif Ericson, who was the first European to make landfall in the Americas. But according to one of the sagas, Leif already knew about Vinland from a guy with the impossibly marvelous name of Bjarni Herjólfsson, who, along with his crew, had been blown off course there several years previously. Of course other sources have it being Leif who was blown off course and wound up in Vinland, so who knows...
This, of course, doesn't actually matter: When they found America, there were already people living there. It had been discovered by them first, and while either Leif, Bjarni, or some other viking did make a legitimate discovery, they were by no means the first people to do so (had they been, they wouldn't have found people there, though there is technically a possibility for that to happen that simply didn't).
__________________
Fudge Assistant in the Playground.

10-29-2012, 09:37 AM   Top  -  End  -  #138
razark
Dwarf in the Playground

Join Date: Jun 2011
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mr.Silver The reason for this being that while Washington was the first person to hold the office of 'President of the United States of America', the US's first president (note lack of capital) would have been Hancock due to him being the president of the Continental Congress when independence was declared.
That would depend on when the United States actually started to exist as an entity. Is the current United States under the Constitution the same as the country that existed under the Articles of Confederation or before? The Declaration of Independence mentions "the united States of America" (note lack of capital).

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mr.Silver Pedantic? Yes, but it seemed fitting given the main topic of the thread

10-29-2012, 11:02 AM   Top  -  End  -  #139
Mr.Silver
Ogre in the Playground

Join Date: Feb 2008
 Location: Earth
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by razark That would depend on when the United States actually started to exist as an entity.
Quite so. 4th of July 1776 is traditionally considered the date when the USA started officially existing as an entity, although you could also argue for 1783 (when Britain formally recognised its independence) - which would make the first president Thomas Mifflin. 1781 is a possibility, which would make the first president John Hanson.
Quote:
 Is the current United States under the Constitution the same as the country that existed under the Articles of Confederation or before? The Declaration of Independence mentions "the united States of America" (note lack of capital).
The capital 'u' was in use by pretty much everyone at the time though, and was set when the Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781. Following that line would therefore be at least as likely to give you John Hanson as it would Washington.
Basing a nation's age on a constitution however can be a bit awkward in any event, e.g. one could use it to make the argument that France has only existed since 1958. Things get very wonky in the cases of nations that don't have a written constitution, such as the UK*.

Regardless of what the most accurate answer actually, the existence of this discussion just goes to show that "who the US's first president was" cannot really be considered as basic a fact as ForzaFiori assumed it could

*it also leaves the proverbial door open to the 'type identity vs. token identity' discussion and how/whether that particular philosophical distinction does/should apply to countries.

Last edited by Mr.Silver : 10-29-2012 at 11:02 AM.

10-29-2012, 03:46 PM   Top  -  End  -  #140
TheFallenOne
Titan in the Playground

Join Date: Dec 2005
 Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mr.Silver Regardless of what the most accurate answer actually, the existence of this discussion just goes to show that "who the US's first president was" cannot really be considered as basic a fact as ForzaFiori assumed it could
Well, I'd say that ambiguity is still better than just being plain wrong like about who discovered America or the Middle Ages being dark
Now I do wonder about the 'capital of Australia' bit; many, or even most, mistakenly believe it to be Sydney. Including me to be honest until I was corrected in, dunno, 8th grade maybe?

That said, the little excursion on who was the first president of the USA under what criteria was quite interesting. But given the presidents are numbered, shouldn't there be an 'official' answer to it or at least one endorsed by the government?
__________________
Not a member of the Bayesian Conspiracy. Honestly. Probably. Maybe.
Find your own priors!

Spoiler: PbP

10-29-2012, 07:02 PM   Top  -  End  -  #141
warty goblin
Firbolg in the Playground

Join Date: May 2007
 Location: Evil God of the Dorms
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Heliomance You can't figure out all the digits of pi because it never ends - it has infinitely many digits, and never starts repeating. There is no way to write pi as a fraction.
Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.

*Although apparently it seems to be basically Euclidean, which is too bad. I'd much rather live in a hyperbolic universe. I want my pentagon with five interior right angles.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Knaight This, of course, doesn't actually matter: When they found America, there were already people living there. It had been discovered by them first, and while either Leif, Bjarni, or some other viking did make a legitimate discovery, they were by no means the first people to do so (had they been, they wouldn't have found people there, though there is technically a possibility for that to happen that simply didn't).
A valid point, which is why I stipulated 'European.'

(Strangely, the Norse may well not have been the first people to discover Iceland. There's some evidence that Irish monks used it as a prayer retreat before the Norse colonization. However they were certainly the first to *settle* it, as one can hardly count a seasonal population of celibate men as any sort of colonization.)
__________________
After the third complaint about the monster arm nailed to my door, I decided 'What Would Beowulf Do?' was not a good personal motto.
Spoiler

10-29-2012, 08:41 PM   Top  -  End  -  #142
Saposhiente
Barbarian in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2010
 Location: An SQL database
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by warty goblin the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.
There are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers (greater cardinality), therefore the probability of pi being rational at any given location is zero. (Though it's technically possible)
__________________

Technical Admin of the Minecraft server. Whitelist is here; put your name there and post it in the thread.
The overly long monstrosity that is my extended signature lies here.
Spoiler
Avatar by Akrim.elf

10-29-2012, 09:23 PM   Top  -  End  -  #143
nedz
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Apr 2010
 Location: London
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by warty goblin Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational. *Although apparently it seems to be basically Euclidean, which is too bad. I'd much rather live in a hyperbolic universe. I want my pentagon with five interior right angles.
Assuming Einstein was right: then the universe has a parabolic geometry.

Euclidean geometry is hyperbolic. (See Euclid:postulate 5)
__________________
p = 4
Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.

Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

Avatar by Caravaggio

Last edited by nedz : 10-29-2012 at 09:23 PM.

10-30-2012, 03:10 AM   Top  -  End  -  #144
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Saposhiente There are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers (greater cardinality), therefore the probability of pi being rational at any given location is zero. (Though it's technically possible)
PROBABILITY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

An event with P(x) = 0 cannot happen. Ever. No, not even then. If it's technically possible, the probability is not zero. It can be infinitesimally small, but not zero.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

Last edited by Heliomance : 10-30-2012 at 03:11 AM.

10-30-2012, 07:06 AM   Top  -  End  -  #145
GnomeFighter
Dwarf in the Playground

Join Date: Dec 2011
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by TheFallenOne Yup. And anyone using the term 'dark ages' is instantly suspected to have little clue of the Middle Ages.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by TheFallenOne Well, I'd say that ambiguity is still better than just being plain wrong like about who discovered America or the Middle Ages being dark
Um... The Dark Ages are not The Middle Ages... Dark Ages is still a perfectly valid name for the Early Middle ages. Normally from the Fall of Rome to around 1050. It's really a much more defined period than the Middle ages.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mr.Silver Basing a nation's age on a constitution however can be a bit awkward in any event, e.g. one could use it to make the argument that France has only existed since 1958. Things get very wonky in the cases of nations that don't have a written constitution, such as the UK*.
Poor example. The date the UK came in to existence is very easy. 1 January 1801, the date the twin 1800 Acts of Union came in to force (and in 1922 in its current state).
__________________
GnomeFighter, Membership Advisor, Henchpersons Union, South and Central (UK) branch - Ask about membership today!

Injured in an evil experiment gone wrong? Suffered defending your employers lair? Get the compensation you deserve! Why wait until you have a doomsday device to exact revenge? Call the Henchpersons Union today. Our specialist evil injury lawyers are waiting to help!

Remember, just because the world will suffer doesn't mean you should too!

10-30-2012, 08:00 AM   Top  -  End  -  #146
nedz
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Apr 2010
 Location: London
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GnomeFighter Um... The Dark Ages are not The Middle Ages... Dark Ages is still a perfectly valid name for the Early Middle ages. Normally from the Fall of Rome to around 1050. It's really a much more defined period than the Middle ages.
The Dark ages was so called because:
For Historians: there are very few written documents.
For the Church: Christianity retrenched as 'pagan' hordes swept through Europe.

Archaeologists don't like the term and it is considered outdated.

The term Migration period is generally preferred, which overlaps with the, so called, Age of Invasions in Britain (Romans to 1066).

The Dark ages were typically regarded as being from the end of the western Roman empire to the rise of the Carolingians. We now call that period late antiquity / early middle ages.
__________________
p = 4
Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.

Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

Avatar by Caravaggio

10-30-2012, 08:44 AM   Top  -  End  -  #147
Mr.Silver
Ogre in the Playground

Join Date: Feb 2008
 Location: Earth
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by TheFallenOne That said, the little excursion on who was the first president of the USA under what criteria was quite interesting. But given the presidents are numbered, shouldn't there be an 'official' answer to it or at least one endorsed by the government?
The 'official' numbering scheme in the USA counts holders of the office 'President of the United States of America' (which are also easier to keep track of than the earlier 'presidents' because they have fixed terms). Unfortunately it doesn't actually provide the accurate figure for how many different people have held this position either, because it counts Grover Cleveland's two terms separately.
So yeah, just because it's 'official' doesn't mean it's technically correct

Funnily enough there is a similar 'official' numbering discrepancy in the British monarchy. Because monarchs only started being numbered after the Norman conquest, King Edward I was actually the second monarch to be called Edward (Edward the Confessor having been the first) and so on with all subsequent Edwards.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GnomeFighter Poor example. The date the UK came in to existence is very easy. 1 January 1801, the date the twin 1800 Acts of Union came in to force (and in 1922 in its current state).
Yes, in much the same way that the USA is considered to have come into existence on the 4th of July 1776 with the Declaration of Independence.

10-30-2012, 10:16 AM   Top  -  End  -  #148
Jay R
Troll in the Playground

Join Date: Oct 2010
 Location: Dallas, TX
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by warty goblin Only when defined for Euclidean geometry in a perfect plane. Since the universe is not perfectly Euclidean* due to pesky things like gravity, the actual value of pi - the ratio of circumference to diameter fluxuates depending on where you are. Somewhere, it's rational.
Pi is a constant, originally defined as the ratio of the circumference and the diameter of a circle on a Euclidean plane.

Its value doesn't change, even though there are non-Euclidean "circles" that are not on a Euclidean plane.

10-30-2012, 11:08 AM   Top  -  End  -  #149
nedz
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Apr 2010
 Location: London
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mr.Silver Funnily enough there is a similar 'official' numbering discrepancy in the British monarchy. Because monarchs only started being numbered after the Norman conquest, King Edward I was actually the second monarch to be called Edward (Edward the Confessor having been the first) and so on with all subsequent Edwards.
Its slightly worse than that since after the act of union we have two numbering systems: one English, one Scottish. Hence James I/VI etc.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jay R Pi is a constant, originally defined as the ratio of the circumference and the diameter of a circle on a Euclidean plane. Its value doesn't change, even though there are non-Euclidean "circles" that are not on a Euclidean plane.
See below
__________________
p = 4
Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.

Completely Dysfunctional Handbook

Avatar by Caravaggio

10-30-2012, 12:13 PM   Top  -  End  -  #150
Heliomance
Ettin in the Playground

Join Date: Jan 2007
Gender:
Re: Mathematics and precedence rules

Ah, but consider a 10' blast. It consists of 12 squares which have an area of 300 sq ft. Thus Pi must clearly be 3.
__________________
Quotebox
Spoiler

Avatar by aravaincomprehensiblename

 Thread Tools

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.

 Home/News - Shops: Ookoodook, CafePress - Latest Comic Contact Us - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Usage of this site, including but not limited to making or editing a post or private message or the creation of an account, constitutes acceptance of the Forum Rules.