9/5/2010 - New OOTS Stuff at Ookoodook
7/31/2010 - GenCon Convention Exclusives
6/9/2010 - Today Only: 25% Off at CafePress
5/6/2010 - New Printing of Dungeon Crawlin' Fools
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Order of the Stick 745 It Does Beat Scissors
Erfworld 163 The End of Book One
RSS Feeds: OOTS Erf Both

The Duke's Wolf, Part Four by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Three by Amber E. Scott
The Duke's Wolf, Part Two by Amber E. Scott

The Gleaner by Keith Baker
'Deadeye' Deegan and the Longshot Clan by Amber E. Scott
The New World, Part 9: Barbarians by Rich Burlew

 


Welcome back! Be sure you have read and understand the Forum Rules.


Go Back   Giant in the Playground Forums > Comics > Webcomics > Erfworld
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Erfworld A forum for discussing the fantasy-comedy webcomic by Rob Balder and Jamie Noguchi.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-12-2007, 02:53 PM   #1
pclips
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 
Northern Virginia
Default Wikipedia Article Discussion

The Wikipedia jihad against webcomics continues. Some agenda-driven boop deleted the Erfworld article yesterday. This is a problem that at least 50 major webcomics have had to contend with this year alone.

I do not really know how to fight it. I'm sick of hearing about it, frankly. But I am going to fight for that article, somehow.

Is anyone here a Wikipedia admin or regular editor who can put in the request for undeletion and make the argument for notability? Primary arguments I see:

1. Featured on GiantITP, a site with massive importance to the comics world and better web traffic than Marvel.com. GiantITP.com is among the top five most popular webcomic sites in the world, according to Alexa.

2. Written by the creator of another, syndicated comic which has passed the criteria for notability multiple times.
__________________
Rob Balder, Erfworld author/co-creator, and creator of PartiallyClips

Last edited by pclips : 03-06-2007 at 07:23 AM. Reason: No longer about deletion of the article but still important
pclips is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:04 PM   #2
Oppolo
Halfling in the Playground
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Despite its placement on GiantITP, I'd have to agree with the wikipedia admin- Erfworld itself just isn't noteable enough yet... it's still too young. You wouldn't stick up any of Rich's alternative rules or the stories (And around and abouts, I have heard about those a lot more than Erfworld) just for their position on giantITP, you wouldn't for Erfworld either.

Give it to about strip 50 of Erfworld and it'll definately have gained notability- until then, relax!
Oppolo is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:10 PM   #3
Beleriphon
Ogre in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 
Protecting my Horde (yes, I mean that kind)
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oppolo View Post
Despite its placement on GiantITP, I'd have to agree with the wikipedia admin- Erfworld itself just isn't noteable enough yet... it's still too young. You wouldn't stick up any of Rich's alternative rules or the stories (And around and abouts, I have heard about those a lot more than Erfworld) just for their position on giantITP, you wouldn't for Erfworld either.

Give it to about strip 50 of Erfworld and it'll definately have gained notability- until then, relax!
Its not so much that, its that web comics as a whole tend to get deleted fairly regularly. There was an article that was deleted on the person who effectively created the concept of web comics, due to lack of notability on the subject of comics in general. It seems to be some kind of consesus ban on web comics in general.

As a fun anecdote all of the articles that had refences to types of cookies (say Oreo) were deleted because they referenced the company that makes them. Some yahoo with editorial privleges deleted them because they broke Wikipedia's rules about advertising. The addition or deletion of articles left to a group of people that may or may not have any idea about that subject, and unfortunately acedemics that are experts in particular areas don't contribute because any idiot with some spare time can edit anything they don't agree with away.
__________________
Current campaign ideas at:

Beleriphon is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:35 PM   #4
Brickwall
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Gender: Female
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

While I agree that Erfworld -while popular, is still young- may not be qualified for Wikipedia yet, the webcomic jihad is pissing me off. If the guy who played Voldemort in the Harry Potter movies can be on there, and nobody will ever EVER want to know about him, then many webcomics should be on there. Like Evil Inc. and the other Blank Label Comics webcomics, and certainly OoTS.

But Erfworld is not yet a 1-year-old. Give it time.

Last edited by Brickwall : 02-12-2007 at 03:35 PM.
Brickwall is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:46 PM   #5
musicnerd
Dwarf in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Gender: Female
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Hey, Ralph Fiennes is a good actor! He has a Tony and was nominated for Oscars. I think Erfworld should have a page, too, of course
__________________
Avatar by Ava

+= <3
Hinjo Fanclub

Dwight Schrute: I have been Michael's number two guy for about five years, and we make a great team. We're like one of those classic famous teams. He's like Mozart and I'm like Mozart's friend. No, I'm like Butch Cassidy and Michael is like Mozart. You try and hurt Mozart, you're gonna get a bullet in your head, courtesy of Butch Cassidy.
musicnerd is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:50 PM   #6
pclips
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 
Northern Virginia
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oppolo View Post
Despite its placement on GiantITP, I'd have to agree with the wikipedia admin- Erfworld itself just isn't noteable enough yet... it's still too young. You wouldn't stick up any of Rich's alternative rules or the stories (And around and abouts, I have heard about those a lot more than Erfworld) just for their position on giantITP, you wouldn't for Erfworld either.

Give it to about strip 50 of Erfworld and it'll definately have gained notability- until then, relax!
Wrong. If any webcomic is notable, Erfworld is notable. It's not particularly easy to separate the readership stats for Erfworld. But by the most conservative possible estimate*, the total number of people reading Erfworld would put it in the top tenth of one percent of all online comics titles.

Additionally, I did not start this project in a vacuum. My other work had already established notability. PartiallyClips easily passes every test ever proposed for a comic strip to have a Wikipedia article, including being actively published in print newspapers, being included in an anthology from a major publisher, and having its own book collection (which Erfworld will have later this year).

Wikipedia is experiencing a power play by a small handful of editors with an agenda. Nobody's arguing that a guy who played 6 tests of cricket for Australia between 1904 and 1911 is not notable enough for Wikipedia. But a comic with an active, engaged readership in the six figures can be insta-scrapped by a guy in Finland whose hobby is collecting insults from people whose articles he deleted.

I was once a great fan of Wikipedia. I donated money to them. But for about a year now, I have seen that it has some really serious problems, and not necessarily the ones everyone thinks. It's not that any bozo can add junk content, or vandalize an article. They have a handle on that. It's that any petty little troll can spend his/her days deleting real content for fun.

Half the webcomics world is fighting this battle, and as far as I can tell, we're losing.

*(the average count of unique visitors to GiantITP on Erfworld update days vs. the same average count on non-update days before Erfworld)
__________________
Rob Balder, Erfworld author/co-creator, and creator of PartiallyClips

Last edited by pclips : 02-12-2007 at 10:10 PM. Reason: spelling error
pclips is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 03:58 PM   #7
mport2004
Dwarf in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Is there any thing we can do?
__________________
mport2004 is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 04:05 PM   #8
Corolinth
Orc in the Playground
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

From a glance, as a disinterested third party, this strikes me as an extension of the jihad that print comic writers and editors have been waging against webcomics since the rise of the internet. Essentially, a group of bitter monkeys are pissed off that webcomics are drawing more readers.
__________________
98% of dolphins make love to the sound of screeching leprachauns, if you are one of the 2% who likes flapjacks...
Corolinth is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 04:20 PM   #9
totalnerduk
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 
England. Land of Engs.
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

I objected and the article has been restored on the following proviso:

Quote:
"If you can add citations from third party sources that indicate notability than I'll move it back to mainspace. "
See here for the full complaint/answer.

Edit: Have added some more. Need assistance from the rest of you now.

Follow the link, follow the link it gives for the "restored" article, and add what the wikiman wants. Add it until all possibilities have been exhausted and we can have it restored.
__________________
I want a pony. In a sandwich.

Member of the fan club since 050206

Last edited by totalnerduk : 02-12-2007 at 04:40 PM. Reason: Edit for more info.
totalnerduk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 04:44 PM   #10
Zavion
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Wikipedia is about the most retarded thing ever.

They go around saying "Such and such should not be here! It's not noteworthy!" When, in reality, depending on your point of view, nothing is really noteworthy.

Now, if you can agree that any game/comic/TV Show is noteworthy, then really there is no reason to discriminate on it against because it came from the internet.

If GitP isn't noteworthy, and by extention, Erfworld because it is a part of GitP, then, neither is Marvel, or any other article of that magnitude.
That should go towards any sort of unproven (to satisfaction) article or theory, and Wikipedia has plenty of those, which are by definition not noteworthy because they don't even exist.

If it's good for one half, it should be good for the other. I can't honestly argue that Erfworld is in any way 'notable', but they can't argue that half the articles they DO keep are either; and if all that 'trash' stays (and I know they want it to or it'd have been deleted too), then it should only be fair that this stays as well.

It's basically saying "These minor achievments that I appreciate are noteworthy, but your minor achievements that I don't really care about are not!". Either they all stay, or they all go.

Wikipedia is a joke, though.
Zavion is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 04:46 PM   #11
Tokiko Mima
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mport2004 View Post
Is there any thing we can do?
Erfworld needs third party sources in order to be moved back out to where it belongs. There's a ton of reviews from other gamer sites out there, and frankly, Erfworld is a gamer-centric comic... so that's a peer review, IMO. So I guess what we could do is search for and organize all the sites reviewing and discussing Erfworld that pass the wikipedia standard for verifiability.
Tokiko Mima is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 04:49 PM   #12
Runolfr
Barbarian in the Playground
 
DwarfFighterGuy
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 
Shire of Glaedenfeld
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

I don't know what their problem is. They have an article on the niche comic "Queen of Wands", but won't carry an article on "Evil, Inc."? I'm sure they have articles on subjects far more obscure and esoteric than web comics. It's a case of somebody being drunk with power.

"Your comic is not worthy!"
__________________
"To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women!" -- Conan, on what is best in life

"A good plan, executed violently now, is better than a perfect plan next week." -- George S. Patton, Jr.
Runolfr is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 05:14 PM   #13
Brickwall
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Gender: Female
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runolfr View Post
I don't know what their problem is. They have an article on the niche comic "Queen of Wands", but won't carry an article on "Evil, Inc."? I'm sure they have articles on subjects far more obscure and esoteric than web comics. It's a case of somebody being drunk with power.

"Your comic is not worthy!"
They have a QOW article? Okay, now I can tell that there's a larger problem than I initially thought. I liked QOW, but Evil Inc. deserves an article far more than QOW.
Brickwall is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 05:32 PM   #14
pclips
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 
Northern Virginia
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by totalnerduk View Post
I objected and the article has been restored on the following proviso:

See here for the full complaint/answer.
Sure, let's start with a news article from Comixpedia, the top news site for webcomics but itself a victim of (and fighter against) the notability nabobs.

Then there was the glowing review by Fleen, a top webcomics review site also chopped out of Wikipedia by toxic scum like this guy.

But those won't fly with agenda-worms like this, who specifically attacked and killed those sources so they could not be cited in other notability fights.

So let's go to the sources Wikipedia deems notable. Here is a stellar review of Erfworld by highly-notable webcomics creator Howard Tayler of Schlock Mercenary. Also worth noting is Howard's recent effort to fight the Wikipedia madness too.

Throw in a shout-out news post at Erfworld's launch from Wikipedia-notable comic AppleGeeks. And again for Hawk's cameo!

Now how about an acknowledgement by Wikipedia-notable musician Jonathan Coulton for Erfworld's reference to one of his songs?

Then how about the 1, 2, 3, 4...5 conventions in the last 6 weeks who have had me as a guest, in large part because I write Erfworld?

You should also mention my personal notability as a webcomics creator based on Wikipedia articles here and here.

There are lots of other links around the web to nice things people have expressed about Erfworld. Tons of them. Three months ago, searching "erfworld" on Google returned 4 links. Now Google estimates 187,000.

But the one cite which is most likely to impress them is probably this official blogger for Time magazine. He is not only highly complimentary of both OOTS and Erfworld, but this is also written as part of a series taking note of the cultural significance of webcomics.

But.

Still.

The main reason Erfworld is notable is that it is HERE. You need to link the Alexa traffic graph for GiantITP.com. Or better yet, this one, comparing GiantITP's numbers to some fun sites it gets more traffic than...Marvel Comics, DC Comics, Visa, and the Dallas Cowboys. Erfworld is not taking credit for that (though the rank has climbed since launch, and passed PvP today). But boop me in the boop if it doesn't indicate the notability of Erfworld that it is hosted here.
__________________
Rob Balder, Erfworld author/co-creator, and creator of PartiallyClips
pclips is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 06:37 PM   #15
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

[edit]If you are a Wikipedian reading over this topic because you think the new Erf article is biased, please note:
Quote:
I will, until given reason not to, retain my faith in humanity and pretend that since the article now easily meets WP:N and WP:RS it should not matter where the interference came from. Sure a biased party was related to the article being brought back, but it was brought back according to wikipedia's rules. After all, no proper channel was left to discuss the deletion in the first place. The only logical recourse is to discuss it elsewhere and recreate it with appropriate wikipedia criteria met.
Thanks folks. Now, proceed to get offended at jaded and bitter discussion of personal opinions about Wikipedia that do not relate to the article in question.[/edit]

ugh. Don't get me wrong, I generally love wikipedia and what it stands for, but what the hell is wrong with these people? The jihad on webcomics was burbling back when I was an active editor, and in the last few weeks it has gone insane, with some morons actively hunting down all webcomic articles and marking them for deletion. What is up with this?

Frankly I stopped worrying about wikipedia some time ago, after about the 30th edit to remove some utterly false comment based on urban legend some numpty kept insisting on adding to an article on biochemistry. It's fun for trivia but fairly useless for actual knowledge. One need only compare the article on some random pokemon to the article on a major city in northern Japan to see my beef.

I wouldn't worry all that much about it, Rob. Let your fans keep creating articles, because you can be guaranteed we will... any fan of erfworld who see the article missing will almost certainly add their own, and in my experience people eventually get tired of deleting an article over and over and over again (in my opinion the continued recreation of an article by multiple users is a sign that the article should be there... it means many people are interested in its content. People who go around hunting for articles to delete, though, don't usually care about whether or not anyone actually wants the article on wikipedia. They are rules lawyers.)

edit: although your previous post should provide sufficient fuel to get the page back up.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.

Last edited by Erk : 02-13-2007 at 04:16 AM.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 06:57 PM   #16
Zavion
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Wikipedia's main failure is that it is editable by anybody that has a computer..

You stated there are handles on vandalism and abuse, but really, half of the stuff in there is un-monitored or only glanced at. I think that the person that creates something should have more control over what is said about his creation than some random 12 year old, but that's just me.
I've seen articles written about things that the very artist that created it came down and fixed, only to have some moron decide he was a quack and change it back; like the artist didn't know what he was talking about for his own creation.

There can be extensive pages on things that are speculation, entire pages on insignificant events that happened inside of significant events, and pages that are barely written at all, but still are there, but god-forbid there be a page about Erfworld.
Zavion is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 07:05 PM   #17
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Almost done writing up a new article, just a starter but chock-full of references. :p I will post it in here under a spoilertag once I am done, so that we have a backup.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 07:14 PM   #18
pclips
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 
Northern Virginia
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk View Post
Almost done writing up a new article, just a starter but chock-full of references. :p I will post it in here under a spoilertag once I am done, so that we have a backup.
You're the best, Erk.
__________________
Rob Balder, Erfworld author/co-creator, and creator of PartiallyClips
pclips is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 07:32 PM   #19
totalnerduk
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 
England. Land of Engs.
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk View Post
Almost done writing up a new article, just a starter but chock-full of references. :p I will post it in here under a spoilertag once I am done, so that we have a backup.
Neat. Saves me having to put all of those references into the current one (which I was going to do tonight). Now I can go to sleep instead.

Although, I may just pop that list somewhere for safekeeping. Afterall, it mgiht be needed as a seperate reference.
__________________
I want a pony. In a sandwich.

Member of the fan club since 050206
totalnerduk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 08:09 PM   #20
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Thanks :) it is really not much, I will try to add more, but it is strong on notability and outside sources. It will be hard to claim this is not a valid wiki article now. Needs real material like story and characters though
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erfworld

I wrote it so that if someone has a backup of the old wiki article the Recognition and Acclaim section can just be tacked on. I recommend keeping that link to the news article on GitP announcing erf's release too though.
Spoiler
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.

Last edited by Erk : 02-12-2007 at 08:15 PM.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 08:13 PM   #21
totalnerduk
Pixie in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 
England. Land of Engs.
Gender: Male
Arrow Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk View Post
Thanks :) it is really not much, I will try to add more, but it is strong on notability and outside sources. It will be hard to claim this is not a valid wiki article now. Needs real material like story and characters though
Spoiler
Well here's what I managed to do to the previous main article. We need somebody to combine the best of both....

Spoiler
__________________
I want a pony. In a sandwich.

Member of the fan club since 050206
totalnerduk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 08:22 PM   #22
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Merged articles:
Spoiler

Edit: updated, merge done a bit better. Edit2: again.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.

Last edited by Erk : 02-12-2007 at 09:08 PM.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 08:57 PM   #23
pclips
Orc in the Playground
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 
Northern Virginia
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Warms my heart, guys. Thank you.

You misspelled "existence" though, and I am on an open proxy barred from editing right now.
__________________
Rob Balder, Erfworld author/co-creator, and creator of PartiallyClips
pclips is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:08 PM   #24
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Curses! I am melting! Anathema to a teacher of English >.< Thanks for the heads-up, I am emberised by my speling errar.

I also forgot to add the references section.
Spoiler

It is a pretty decent list. If they speedy delete it, this is like totally going on my MySpace.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.

Last edited by Erk : 02-12-2007 at 09:13 PM.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:25 PM   #25
Lord Zentei
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Eh, this is the problem with Wikipedia. Any tool can amble along and play titan.
__________________
Spoiler
Lord Zentei is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:04 PM   #26
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

That's not really the problem with wikipedia, that is the advantage. The problem is that the rules that are being lawyered need heavy revision, and it suffers from big-headedness. Wikipedia is great, but its designers and authors need to keep in mind that by its very nature it can never be a primary reference, and stop trying to treat it like one.

But that's not the nature of this problem. This is just a small part of another idiotic internet feud, this one between a subset of wikipedians and the majority of the webcomic community.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.
Erk is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:15 PM   #27
The_Old_Fox
Dwarf in the Playground
 
OldWizardGuy
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 
North to South
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

"Wikipedia, keeping Encyclopedias in print since 2001."

Truthfully, for all of its promise Wikipedia doesn't deliver. Your problem, and as was also pointed out the problem of webcomics in general, is just one of many. Even though everyone can edit, few enough people actually do, and people are given free run for their personal crusades and agendas with very little repercussion. Individuals, corporations, and heck even governments are able to hide behind their computers and do whatever they want. As for really good writers, what does it benefit them to write an article? Some punk may vandalize it, or delete it for no good reason and the author gets minimal recognition and no money.

At best Wikipedia is springboard for research and information, at worst it is a bed of misinformation and the most petty of intrigues. And don't get me started on its supposed "neutrality".

Huh, I am ranting, must be because I am old.

In conclusion Erfworld and webcomics in general rock.
__________________
Sacrificing Minions: is there any problem it CAN'T solve?
prison change thog.
The_Old_Fox is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:03 AM   #28
Lord Zentei
Bugbear in the Playground
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk View Post
That's not really the problem with wikipedia, that is the advantage. The problem is that the rules that are being lawyered need heavy revision, and it suffers from big-headedness. Wikipedia is great, but its designers and authors need to keep in mind that by its very nature it can never be a primary reference, and stop trying to treat it like one.
And there is that.

However, the fact that anyone can meander along and do as they wish to existing articles is precisely the issue. To allow this opens the possibility for abuse. To limit it is to abandon the wiki paradigm, at least to a degree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erk View Post
But that's not the nature of this problem. This is just a small part of another idiotic internet feud, this one between a subset of wikipedians and the majority of the webcomic community.
It is a manifestation of the problem.
__________________
Spoiler
Lord Zentei is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:30 AM   #29
erewhon
Dwarf in the Playground
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

I really don't "get" all the downers on Wikipedia here. I can find hard references to stuff on there that astonishes me.

All the cultural crap is just that: Crap. Gun for the real content, like the tensile strength of vanadium. :)

Besides, it's hella cheaper than print encyclopedias. :)
__________________
Roy Greenhilt: All leaders should aspire to his greatness!
erewhon is offline  
Old 02-13-2007, 12:54 AM   #30
Erk
Barbarian in the Playground
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 
Between Japan and Canada
Gender: Male
Default Re: Wikipedia Article Deletion

erewhon: I spent a lot of time editing real articles about real subjects, including woodworking, Japanese food and local geography, and biochemistry. With the possible exception of woodworking, these are all things I flatter myself that I know quite a lot about. With the exception of woodworking, these are all things where I got utterly sick of reverting comments and added false "clarifications" by people who got their facts from the back of a crackerjack box, or were soapboxing for religious institutions or other groups (the latter are the worst, far worse than vandals. They go in and delete solid material because it is "perspective", or add a secondary "valid" opinion that has no references to compete with a well-referenced and backed up section. And I'm not just talking about hot topics like evolution or even scientific articles in general here).

Although I have fun reading about topics I don't understand on wikipedia, I would never believe any tensile strength of vanadium statistics from it, not even enough to write a science fiction novel. I have firsthand experience for how seriously screwed-up even hard-fact articles get.
__________________
"River" cancels eat: Food is problematic.

Last edited by Erk : 02-13-2007 at 12:59 AM.
Erk is offline  
 


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.