1. - Top - End - #124
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2011

    Default Re: "Wait, that didn't work right" - the Dysfunctional Rules Collection

    Quote Originally Posted by Firechanter View Post
    There are all kinds of idiotic houserules. Critical fumbles are but one type. ^^

    Anyway, 'nuther well-known WotC blunder, listed for the sake of completeness:
    Martial Adepts' Stance Progression.
    A straight Warblade gains access to a 5th-level class feature (level 3 stance) only at level 10. A multiclassed Warblade/X gets it by level 6.

    (At least this is easily fixed by delaying the 2nd stance by one level. For Crusaders it's a lot more difficult, their progression is a lot more fouled up.)
    On a related note, is there any reason to take Crusader 20? The 'capstone' is pathetic, and the whole messed up stance progression system means no access to 8th-level stances. Which is mind-numbingly stupid, to put it bluntly, since they can't take Immortal Fortitude without multiclassing, despite it being the Crusaders' signature stance.

    I mean, aside from the whole "better than Fighter 20" thingy, of course.
    Last edited by NNescio; 2011-09-12 at 04:10 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by kardar233 View Post
    GitP: The only place where D&D and Cantorian Set Theory combine. Also a place of madness, and small fairy cakes.