Well, I suppose that's good start...!
Aaargh. It's so hard to get at what I'm getting at without outright saying it... (I think I rewrote the post about four times...)
Okay, so let's try phrasing it this way: What would be your impression of the (technological) entity who's head it is, based on that image (assuming you saw/met/ect.ect. it, where that was the only part of it you could see).
That's a bit artifical, but I'm trying really hard not to say "does it look like this", because I'd rather it be more obvious.
(Though starter for ten, says "probably not worked.")