Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
The two images of the rift linked are several months apart, and the rift was still growing during that time.
really? Because the rift information linked are:
Rift on top of castle ruin, and this is rather close in time with Redcloaks information of the rift not growing much anymore and the rift maybe slightly larger, still on top of castle ruin. Or was there really several months between 545 and 658, and Redcloak was utterly wrong? Or were there several months between 510 and 545?
In 658, the tendrils of the rift are much closer to Xykons tower than you would expect from previous comics.

This is imho just minor nitpicking though. We don't see the rift itself in 658, only the tendrils. It falls under artistic license: The tower and the rift are much farther away from each other, but if the real distance were shown, it wouldn't be possible to draw V and O in the tower, and the distance would be much more wasted space, and so on.