Quote Originally Posted by Glass Mouse View Post
I have pretty fine hair (=blonde), so maybe that's part of the problem, but I'm quite mixed about whether or not it's worth the trouble. Half the hairs break instead of being removed, and it took close to an 1½ hour to do both legs every first time.
On the upside, my legs does stay mostly smooth for a week, but it's not "ooh, no hairs at all!" smooth, more "wow your hair growth is so fine that it can't be noticed unless properly inspected and/or touched". Probably takes 3-4 weeks to get it all back. So, full hair removal it is not. Also, it hurts like hell the first time because there are so many hairs, but afterwards (when you've thinned them out) it gets better (and faster).
At least it never gets prickly
That sounds improvement actually. A day after having my legs are already resembling sandpaper.