Quote Originally Posted by Talakeal View Post
Are we really using Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy logic to debate RAW?
If you're referencing my argument, just because something showed up in a particular source doesn't necessarily make it logically invalid (I've never actually read The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, so I am definitely not taking the logic from there).

Consider an arbitrary mixed drink. In this specific arbitrary mixed drink, the drink doesn't fully mix (by design), and there's droplets of rum scattered throughout a different liquid (taking up a grand total of, say, 20% of the volume of the drink). If you have an infinite volume of this mixed drink, then by definition, you have an infinite volume of rum as well. This works for any real, positive percentage that is distinguishable from zero.

Please, try to attack the logic itself, rather than where you've seen the argument before.