-
2012-04-21, 11:22 AM (ISO 8601)
-
Top
-
End
-
#91
Re: "Common Sense" approach to rules (RACSD)
I've numbered Siosilvar's proposals, but not the thing on chakra binds or the query about natural weapons.
16 -- On Tower Shields. Disagree, although they do need work. The intent, as far as I'm aware, is that the total cover is mutual: you "give up your attacks" because you're denied LoE.
17 -- Non-Floating Armour. Agree.
In answer to Siosilvar's proposals:
18 (S1) -- On Feats. Agree.
19 (S2) -- On Multiclassing. Agreed. As far as I'm aware, this was a genuine screw-up.
20 (S3) -- Temporary Qualifications. Agreed. This seems acceptable to me.
21 (S4) Abstained.
22 (S5b) -- On Aptitude. The second version seems reasonable.
In answer to hamishspence:
23 -- On Lava and Immunities. Agree. I imagine the wording should be:
A resistance or immunity to fire is also effective against damage dealt by lava or magma.
In answer to Erikun's proposals:
24 -- My Weapon Is My Shield: Agreed.
25 -- Animate Alignment Debate: Agreed. An outright house rule, but again, I'm still willing to rubber-stamp it.
26 -- Death Watches No Evil: Agreed.
27 -- Positive Drawbacks to Undead: Agreed.
28 -- Enchanting Enhanced Projectiles: Disagreed. I agree with the need for a fix, but I prefer Ashtagon's solution of simply banning ammunition from having those enhancements.
29 -- Swordsaging in Leather or No: Agreed.
Last edited by lesser_minion; 2012-04-21 at 03:12 PM.