Quote Originally Posted by RMS Oceanic View Post
I've said before it makes sense to revisit our assumptions, so what do you guys think: Should we now assume the disarmee/tripee/graplee not making an AoO means the disarmer/triper/grapler has the Improved [action] feat, or should we continue needing other proof of it?
We should continue needing other evidence. The AoO rules are very much not the sort of thing Rich is scrupulously precise about.