But, in order to follow the Third Law, you would have to acknowledge it's existence. But if you acknowledge it's existence, then you have to pretend it doesn't exist. Then again, if you pretend it doesn't exist, you now longer have any prompting to follow it, thereby meaning that you should no longer pretend that it doesn't exist. But, that means acknowledging its existence, and now we're back at square one.

I'll just store that idea under my list of logical paradoxes, giving it a slightly more elegant structure. (The first rule of thermodynamics is to break the first rule of thermodynamics.) I'm stockpiling paradoxes for the event of a robot uprising.

Also, I've just lost the game.