Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
He's had a key role in Tarquin's "unite and conquer" scheme for the better part of fifteen years; a campaign of conquest deceit and the brutal subjugation of the better part of an entire continent. Even if he didn't do any of the dirty-work himself, he has certainly earned his 1/6th of his party's evil deeds just through knowingly aiding the conspiracy.
Neither conquest nor deceit are inherently evil. Brutal subjugation is, but if Malack doesn't personally participate in that and believes Tarquin's "greater good" justification, it is possible he could still squeak through as neutral.