View Single Post

Thread: "Common Sense" approach to rules (RACSD)

  1. 2013-01-16, 11:26 PM (ISO 8601) - Top - End - #499
    rockdeworld
    rockdeworld is offline
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Stillwater
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: "Common Sense" approach to rules (RACSD)

    Can you change "see rule 34" to, perhaps, "see rule 034"? It might just be me, but when I saw that the first two times, I thought "what does squick have to do with armor?" Plus, 034 is how you have it labeled.

    Also, I'm for 65, and against 64A&B, because it makes martial characters worse, and using a skill at -20 to duplicate a weak feat/situational combat ability doesn't seem bad to me.
    Last edited by rockdeworld; 2013-01-16 at 11:27 PM.