It's not another case where eye candy works for women too, it's a case where you're assuming eye candy works for the woman in question without actually knowing if it's true.
Ah, if you meant that one specific instance, that's a different story. Although avoiding webcams and microphones shouldn't be considered weird, should it?Not touching on the more delicate parts of this question but if you read the article you'll notice the writer used pictures of friends and made up lies to avoid webcams and microphones. If that isn't dishonest I'm not quite sure what is.