Quote Originally Posted by ChristianSt View Post
Have I missed someone stating the desire to establishing complex rules?
The suggested rule isn't that complex really, my bad. The discussion about it, however... If not complex, it is, at least, long.

Quote Originally Posted by ChristianSt View Post
Though on a second thought I would change it to "Rule G: Transcripts of Q&A sessions with Rich Burlew may be included in secondary posts to the Index, in their entirety, if they fulfill Rule A. Other rules don't need to be enforced. Whether they will be included or not in their entirety is up to thread consensus."
I still think it isn't particularly necessary to formalize things to such a degree, but hey, we have a inter-book hiatus right now, I guess we need something to talk about

If we have to have a rule, then I think Jasdoif's wording makes the most sense. I wouldn't worry about the exact meaning of "majority"... That would be sorted out by thread consensus, if ever the case arises.

And, for sure, any rule addition needs a vote, if only to avoid protest further down the line.