View Single Post

Thread: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII

  1. - Top - End - #118
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXVII

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrin View Post
    ...
    The buckler-axe makes no exception for itself because it never stated that it had to use the buckler rules.
    Fair enough. Then you cannot hold a weapon in the same hand as the buckler axe in that case.

    If it behaves like a buckler, you take the penalties to attack and lose the ac bonus if you attack with a weapon held that hand.
    If it does not behave like a buckler, you do not get to hold a weapon in that hand.
    Last edited by Gildedragon; 2014-05-21 at 02:11 PM.
    Handbook in Process:Getting the Facts Straight: A Guide to the Factotum

    Homebrew:
    Spoiler
    Show
    The Singular Band: There can be only one
    Khayal: A monster class worth playing


    Quote Originally Posted by Deophaun View Post
    Player: I'll use a classic ploy. "Help! Guards! He's having a seizure!"
    DM: You're the only one in the prison.
    Player: I'm very convincing.
    DM: And there are no guards.
    Player: But there's masonry.
    DM: It's not even animate, let alone sentient.
    Player: That's ok. I'll take the penalty.