Quote Originally Posted by OldTrees1 View Post
Ex: "To be fair, anyone who thinks ToB stuff (ignoring the vagueness of WRT and IHS) is overpowered has clearly never seen a wizard played to its potential, and therefore is ignorant."

This statement assumes but does not state that "Balance is defined by Wizards being played properly, rather than being defined by Bards or Barbarians being played properly". The unstated assumption creates a generalization language when we can tell a specific language was intended in order to make the logic valid.
I felt that the implication there was, in fact, that a properly played wizard broke all semblance of balance. And I thought I made it fairly clear. My apologies if it was not.