Your opinon on Tome of Battle

[OldTrees1]

I felt that the implication there was, in fact, that a properly played wizard broke all semblance of balance. And I thought I made it fairly clear. My apologies if it was not.

Oh, then it was rightly criticized as being an invalid argument. Given a definition of balance X, showing Y+100>X provides no information about if Y is or is not greater than X. So showing a properly played Wizard is OP gives no evidence to support the claim that ToB is never OP for any definition of balance X. This then makes the conclusion about ignorance, ignorant.