Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth View Post
Legend's problems - and dormancy - happened well before 5e and frankly laying its death at the feet of that travesty is insulting to the quality of work performed by Rule of Cool.
And yet, I can't help but feel that if 5e hadn't happened, there'd be more clamoring for Legend and its advertised role as the golden mean between the extremes of 3e wide imbalance and 4e's laserlike focus on balance to the exclusion of other aspects of the game - and with that clamor, more impetus to get it over the finish line.

But it's just my opinion, and definitely not intended to insult anyone or anything at all.

Quote Originally Posted by Alea View Post
I don't think Legend was ever seriously trying to compete with 5e; that'd be preposterous.
Indeed, which is why I didn't say that.