Quote Originally Posted by daniel_ream View Post
Unless Einstein is wrong, but if you're going to postulate that you're into Clarke's Third Law territory.
Didn't they have already prove that Einstein was wrong? Maybe not in this area but I'm pretty sure the who reason we have special relativity is because Einstein's general relativity didn't hold in small cases and quantum physics came out of that. And to quote the man himself:

"If an old and learned man tells you something is possible, he is almost certainly correct. If an old and learned man tells you something is impossible, he is almost certainly wrong." Maybe Einstein, lots of things get misattributed to him.

Swordsaged, I would actually like to see an answer to the question about how that violates casualty. Forget the supersonic jet, I don't see how it differs from rolling a ball down a hill and running down to catch it. (Other than the speeds involved of course.) Could we get more information on that?