And when she specifically told Andi what to do, the person now charging her with not telling Andi what to do prior to that claimed that as a justification for the following vicious assault (which made it somehow not a vicious assault). This looks like a textbook example of "not arguing in good faith" to me; it's downright ludicrous to suggest a problem with Rich's writing is demonstrated by his failure to convince someone this determined not to be convinced.