To be fair, I did select a bit. Mostly for pictures with women and men on them, though - after going through stuff for the second edition, maybe some more (With quite some scantily clad men, now.):
1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11
And sure, some of that is okay. And DnD might have been doing alright as well. But most of that... really isn't, and DnD wasn't alone on the market for long. So from my experiences - yeah, portraials of female armor/Adventuring clothing have improved greatly over the years, even in RPGs, where there WAS a certain "need" for improvement. To act as if there were only bad examples is dishonest, sure, but to act as if there wasn't (or isn't still) a certain problem is as well.
...Unless, of course, one doesn't consider non-equal representation of men and women to be a problem. But I do.
Pretty close to my take. I just really love the character and the fact that this is amongst the iconics now - a woman defined mostly by her muscles and strength, not her prettyness.
(Depicting especially iconic characters in helmets is not the strong suit of the illustrations, sadly; at least not better than in most media. So, no, she never wears one.)
For better depictions of armor:
Maybe this? My second favourite picture of an armored woman from the current edition - the favourite isn't findable by google, sadly
Or, one of my favourite signs of "Hey, something is changing":
Rondra, the goddess of Honor, War and Storms... One time from 4th Edition, one time from 5th.
...Dark Eye picdump over. (For now?)