Revised ranger beast progression class/character levels?

[Oozelord]

Yeah I can get behind that.
But if they can't use UA to test the waters for multiclass shenanigans how will they do it then? In house?- because multiclassing have a whole lot more pitfalls than a whiteroom single class. It would be more effective to get the community working on that part.

It seems only natural that when a class is deemed "good" by the community that it would go through a second proofing, testing another variable - for instance multiclassing.

It would be nice if they wrote their goals into the document. For instance they explicitly wrote that the mystic hasn't been geared to multiclassing yet. This meant that players already knew not to waste time to offer feedback on that part yet.

Later when the mystic is closer to getting an official entry they could put him in UA again, this time with an info box explaining that he is mulitclassable.
That would also be some valid research approach, as it would lessen respondee errors.

But how would you rule the revised ranger? Disallow him multiclassing? Or that it's all class levels, except prof bonus?