Quote Originally Posted by Gruftzwerg View Post
RAW is word and rule lawyering as stated several times.
No it isn't, as was explained several times.

There are many guidelines for interpreting the Rules As Written and how to approach the exact text that is stated. And they include contextual definitions, a glossary when needed, and a judicious application of common sense,

You are the only person here who operates under the assumption that rules-lawyering is appropriate for discussing character optimization.



Since most people fail at distinguishing between RAI and RAW and those who can know that it makes no sense to play RAW
This is by far the most ironic thing you have posted in this entire thread.

As you've admitted you operate under the assumption that rules-lawyering counts as RAW, and that term is by definition personal interpretation.

The whole point of having Rules As Written is so that we can leave personal interpretation out of the discussion when examining optimal character choices. Working from the same set of rules makes threads like these completely unnecessary.

You have never once argued the Rules As Written. You have, and continue to, argue the Rules As I Interpret Them And You Can't Prove I'm Wrong.