1. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Grey_Wolf_c's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007

    Default Re: Can I post After Action Reports and stories in GitP?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cap'n Gravelock View Post
    Can I post After Action Reports and stories in GitP?
    Depends. Will there be others posting in these threads? Are you expecting feedback from others, or your players? Or is this meant to be your private blog? The first is fine, the second is not. From a previous thread asking about campaign journals, and how that would fit with the double-posting rule:

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland St. Jude View Post
    I recently started a 'Campaign Journal' thread in the Roleplaying Games section, to provide recaps to a RL group member that would be unable to attend for a time. However, as far as I am aware, I am the only member of this group to have an account here. This being the case, would it be acceptable for me to repeat post if no one else has a comment on it?

    If this has been addressed, I didn't see the rule for it. Thanks for your time.
    Sheriff: Not really, no. We have a rule against double posting, which exists to prevent a variety of ills. One of those is that if the topic is not of interest to other posters, we don't want one poster to just keep at it alone, piling post on post. This seems to apply with full force to a campaign journal as much as any other kind of thread. If no one is interested enough to comment on your post, it suggests perhaps additional updates aren't warranted. If this is just between you another person, perhaps a Private Message, email, or blog would serve better.
    GW
    Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2018-04-08 at 11:47 AM.
    Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.
    There is a world of imagination
    Deep in the corners of your mind
    Where reality is an intruder
    And myth and legend thrive
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    But really, the important lesson here is this: Rather than making assumptions that don't fit with the text and then complaining about the text being wrong, why not just choose different assumptions that DO fit with the text?
    Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est