Quote Originally Posted by AMFV View Post
The thing is you're asking for a feature then using the word budget. As I said I literally would not buy pants without pockers. Period. I would pay double for them.


As far as the difference between trade and office wear. I think that is relevant. In that few women work in the trades which is where I discovered the seriousness of a need for pockets. I suspect if more ladies did they might but pocketed pants.

The difference here is that I'm willing to buy the more expensive item to have pockets. Which means the cheap manufacturers HAVE to have oockers or they wouldn't sell.
You wouldn't buy trousers without pockets because you've never had to. You're used to being able to walk into any clothing store in the land, and every single pair of trousers will have pockets. Why shouldn't it be the same for women?