I don't specifically have a problem with requiring a vote to remove no matter how much unanimity there appears to be, when somebody believes there is no longer value in keeping it, but since it came up I do think we may want to consider formalizing a stance on what to do about quotes that, for whatever reason, no longer meet the guidelines for inclusion. For example, lets say Rich makes a clarification about something, then deletes the comment after it gets indexed. Do we still need to vote to remove that from the index? Personally, I don't think we do, I think we should just skip straight to removing it. But under current rules for removal, we would have to, and we could even conceivably end up having indexed a quote that no longer exists. I don't think this specific scenario is too terribly likely, but since were on the topic anyway, I believe we should codify a procedure.