Quote Originally Posted by Lvl45DM! View Post
Cap is explicitly libertarian in the MCU. Opposed to enforced govt control of his actions. That actually screams CG to me. He is constantly, explicitly concerned with freedom of the individual.

Tony is NG, does whatever he thinks is best in the moment, whether its telling the Senate to blow off, or giving in to the Sokovia Accords.

Vision is the LG one, concerned with equations leading to abstract generalized catastrophe and holding to Cap's actions as a guide for himself. He cares about community and the concepts thereof, which shows in how he tries to help Scarlet Witch.
Hmm. No.

Lawful good (LG) creatures can be counted on to do the right thing as expected by society.
If that smacks of Vision to you (i.e. "I'm so above society that its rules don't apply to me"), I'm hesitant to see what your idea of Law even means.

Neutral good (NG) folk do the best they can to help others according to their needs.
Do you _really_ think that describes Tony Stark? Post- Iron Man 3, I can _kinda_ see that, but I think he still fits better with...

Chaotic good (CG) creatures act as their conscience directs, with little regard for what others expect.
This one is a little more interesting because, yes, Cap does act as his conscience directs. To say that it's "with little regard for what others expect" is pushing it, though, especially because he is often expected to do evil actions, or at least "not good". As such, he does the right thing as expected by _the people_ and society at large, not necessarily the people running it.

To reCap (ha! pun), Vision is not Lawful Good, Iron Man is likely Chaotic Good, and Cap is probably not Chaotic Good.