Quote Originally Posted by ezekielraiden View Post
Just to confirm, here, your position is that this is fine:
"Druids cannot wear metal armor, because the sacred oaths they take as part of becoming a Druid forbid such equipment. If they do so, they cannot memorize or cast Druid spells until they remove the armor."

But this is not fine:
"Druids will not wear metal armor, because the sacred oaths they take as part of becoming a Druid forbid such equipment. If they do so, they cannot memorize or cast Druid spells until they remove the armor."

Literally the only difference is "cannot" vs. "will not." I just want to be certain you're saying that that's the difference you need.
No. Phrased like that, my position would be that this:

"Druids cannot wear metal armor, because the sacred oaths they take as part of becoming a Druid forbid such equipment. If they do so, they cannot memorize or cast Druid spells until they remove the armor."
is less unacceptable than this:

"Druids will not wear metal armor, because the sacred oaths they take as part of becoming a Druid forbid such equipment. If they do so, they cannot memorize or cast Druid spells until they remove the armor."
It would still be unacceptable in comparison to "Monks that wear armor or use shields do not gain the benefit of Class Features Blah, Blah, Blah, and Blah." Nothing about " Monks can't wear armor" or "Monks won't wear armor".