In Oona's case I don't think it's any more (or less) evidence than Roy explicitly calling her a ranger in 1273. I think that's good enough, the consensus position in discussion says it isn't, so I expect we're still stuck with the status quo.
In Oona's case I don't think it's any more (or less) evidence than Roy explicitly calling her a ranger in 1273. I think that's good enough, the consensus position in discussion says it isn't, so I expect we're still stuck with the status quo.
Last edited by Gurgeh; 2023-11-27 at 11:20 PM.