Originally Posted by
Thursday
"It's as if the author is telling us that what we see in crayon pictures is not always the truth, by showing us an exact panel we've seen before but with one crucial change." (sorry haven't figured out how to quote multiple posts yet)
Er, well, Yeah.... but haven't we been told this already? In every case the crayons are used its clearly a character describing the past to someone else. In SOD, where as I'm sure you know, the fact that the narrator was lying in a crayon sequence is explicitly called out by one of the listeners...
(sorry for the creaking language, I haven't figured spoilers out either, I suck)
-He doesn't need to show us using small changes in panels what he has a character flat out tell us, (admittedly in a prequel book which many won't have read.)
Plus now in 704, Redcloak straight out asks if what Jirix is describing happened or not..
So.. To be honest I thought that stuff in crayon may or may not be the whole truth was pretty well established...