Quote Originally Posted by Gametime View Post
No, it doesn't. The chances of getting a true answer by asking a question twice are directly derived from the chances of getting a true answer by asking a question once; in other words, your chances of success are always derived from the table.

The results represented on the table might cease to be directly applicable if you ask the same question more than once, but the table never becomes meaningless, certainly not immediately.
I can't be bothered to go dig out enough stat's to give you an accurate number but I figure after 5 questions the chances of having less than 3 correct answers is below 1%. I'd say that's pretty close to zero.

It's certainly a whole heck of a lot less than 12%. Which makes the table meaningless.

That last sentence sounds familiar. I think I might have used it before....

Quote Originally Posted by Gametime View Post
Arguing that a rule don't say something because that would make itself pointless is valid.
Fixed that for ya.