New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 24 of 51 FirstFirst ... 14151617181920212223242526272829303132333449 ... LastLast
Results 691 to 720 of 1503
  1. - Top - End - #691
    Banned
     
    Optimystik's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    No. He did not.

    Let's not base our speculations on Telephone Game distortions of what Rich said.
    Listen to the druid, people.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Miel View Post
    I presume Godzilla is protected by copyright.
    I doubt it: Godzilla has permeated the public consciousness to the point that it has become metonymy. It is so synonymous with the concept of "giant monster" that characters in fictional works should be free to use the terms interchangeably, just like with the words "copy" and "xerox."

  2. - Top - End - #692
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Optimystik View Post
    I doubt it: Godzilla has permeated the public consciousness to the point that it has become metonymy. It is so synonymous with the concept of "giant monster" that characters in fictional works should be free to use the terms interchangeably, just like with the words "copy" and "xerox."
    That's not really how copyright law works. Though, since your example is just the use of the name, rather than of the actual intellectual property, that's right as far as it goes. But since it seems like they were arguing whether or not the MiTD would be a Godzilla (whatever that means), which would infringe on actual intellectual property, we'd probably just be set up for another Jones & Rodriguez appearance if it turned out that way.

    Nothing I've seen Rich say excludes the possibility of MiTD being a non-D&D monster. There are plenty of made-up monsters to go around. I'd still expect it to turn out to be one, but I would neither be shocked nor cry foul if it's revealed to be from another grouping of invented monsters.

  3. - Top - End - #693
    Banned
     
    Ancalagon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Does not matter how copyright law works. Unless Rich makes the "mitd as godzilla" (or pit-fiend, for that matter!) a major plot in his story, he'll get away with "it's satire". An entire book or even a half one about "The Mini-Godzilla from the Shadows" would probably cause trouble.
    But some stick-figured mini-godzilla that shows up in like... up to a dozen strips (and only in a few panels in them) among 150 and most of them are full of jokes... I doubt someone would even consider to sue.

  4. - Top - End - #694
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    That is also not how copyright law works.

  5. - Top - End - #695
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Acero's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Somewhere
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    don't know if this has been stated b4, but the MitD could be a shapeshifter

  6. - Top - End - #696
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    WolfInSheepsClothing

    Join Date
    Sep 2007

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Its a DM!

    Horrifically powerful, can make anything they want happen, plays with dolls (the characters) , stays hidden in the shadows even though everyone knows its there, and Usually works best by making people think he's done nothing at all.

  7. - Top - End - #697
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    I can't imagine no one's suggested this before, so I apologize if this has already been thrown out there, but what about some kind of epic-class dragon(like a force or prismatic)? It would explain the re-god-damn-diculous strength score, and his DR would be epic, so that fits the fact that he's pretty much invulnerable, and I'm fairly certain those dragons gain spells as a sorc as they get older, so there's your teleport. Also I think both of those dragons are usually good, and the MITD has shown that he's not evil.

    Just an idea...or even better, the Tarrasque? It fits the "great bull" description, and explains his strength, although the teleport not so much haha

  8. - Top - End - #698
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    hamishspence's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Main problem is size- the Monster isn't very big, and these dragons (Prismatic, Force) start at Huge.
    Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
    New Marut Avatar by Linkele

  9. - Top - End - #699
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYanks6083 View Post
    I can't imagine no one's suggested this before, so I apologize if this has already been thrown out there, but what about some kind of epic-class dragon(like a force or prismatic)? It would explain the re-god-damn-diculous strength score, and his DR would be epic, so that fits the fact that he's pretty much invulnerable, and I'm fairly certain those dragons gain spells as a sorc as they get older, so there's your teleport. Also I think both of those dragons are usually good, and the MITD has shown that he's not evil.
    Someone did propose a prismatic dragon. The sky-high Intelligence and Wisdom scores present something of a problem, though I'd still call it way more viable than...
    Just an idea...or even better, the Tarrasque? It fits the "great bull" description, and explains his strength, although the teleport not so much haha
    The lack of any intelligence or teleportation ability takes the tarrasque completely off the table as far as I'm concerned.

    Nothing in the story links the creature in the darkness to the orcs' former god in any way. That interpretation hinges on missing the joke about where the "great bull" went.

  10. - Top - End - #700
    Banned
     
    Ancalagon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    I think the fact that the MM *explicitly* states there's only one tarrasque (ever, not even "one at any time" but really "there is only one in your world, really!") takes "another, smaller tarrasque" from the table.
    Rich could have changed that, sure. But I think one of the points that makes the tarrasque what it is and what makes is special is its absolute and basically unparalleled uniqueness.

  11. - Top - End - #701
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by derfenrirwolv View Post
    Its a DM!

    Horrifically powerful, can make anything they want happen, plays with dolls (the characters) , stays hidden in the shadows even though everyone knows its there, and Usually works best by making people think he's done nothing at all.
    beats my guess that MitD was blackmage after a personality altering concussion

  12. - Top - End - #702
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    The lack of any intelligence or teleportation ability takes the tarrasque completely off the table as far as I'm concerned.
    ....maybe he read book? Hey he's hanging out with like 3 spellcasters

    Nah i'm kidding, yeah the Tarrasque probably not. The Dragon idea though, I mean the MITD is still basically a kid, and no one's been really actively trying to teach him anything (besides maybe O-Chul), so it could be partly because a lack of education and still being very young(by dragon standards)
    Last edited by NYYanks6083; 2009-07-31 at 12:28 PM.

  13. - Top - End - #703
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Ron Miel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Optimystik View Post
    I doubt it: Godzilla has permeated the public consciousness to the point that it has become metonymy. It is so synonymous with the concept of "giant monster" that characters in fictional works should be free to use the terms interchangeably, just like with the words "copy" and "xerox."
    Actually, companies like Xerox fight like hell to prevent their names from becoming generic. If Rich wrote a storyline about a wizard named Xerox who has the power to duplicate items, then he'd certainly be sued over it. Probably the same if the wizard was called Zeerocks.

    more details
    .
    -.____________________
    ./___________________()-------Ron Miel
    |...___________________--------sits down
    |..| |_________________()-------and starts
    |..|/__________________--------singing
    | ___________________()-------about gold

    .

  14. - Top - End - #704
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    also not a whole lot of other species have toddlers that can punch a horse through a wall

  15. - Top - End - #705
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    I'm by no way expert in DnD or any setting's lore, so I do not know every monster in there, but as far as I've seen, there is no monster that fits all of what we know about MitD. Thus, I speculate this might be a template. Or a character classes, whatever that would change monster strongly enough. If we strip it off the template (or what-have-it), it should be something quite generic, like a bugbear, or owlbear (it's not an actual guess, just throwing out random names).

  16. - Top - End - #706
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Supposing that's the case, it changes the question in a minuscule way rather than answering it, doesn't it? Instead of "what species is the creature in the darkness," suddenly the question is, "what template in the creature in the darkness." How is this line of speculation useful?

  17. - Top - End - #707
    Banned
     
    Snake-Aes's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    R'lyeh
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrax View Post
    I'm by no way expert in DnD or any setting's lore, so I do not know every monster in there, but as far as I've seen, there is no monster that fits all of what we know about MitD. Thus, I speculate this might be a template. Or a character classes, whatever that would change monster strongly enough. If we strip it off the template (or what-have-it), it should be something quite generic, like a bugbear, or owlbear (it's not an actual guess, just throwing out random names).
    Togepi.

    <obligatory text for minimum text pre-requisites>

  18. - Top - End - #708
    Banned
     
    Optimystik's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Miel View Post
    Probably the same if the wizard was called Zeerocks.
    That, he'd probably get away with. But I see your point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kish View Post
    Supposing that's the case, it changes the question in a minuscule way rather than answering it, doesn't it? Instead of "what species is the creature in the darkness," suddenly the question is, "what template in the creature in the darkness." How is this line of speculation useful?
    It's useful because it fits the requirements of not being a complete ass-pull while still being able to pull off the abilities that we have seen. Speculating on one particular creature is getting us nowhere, so why not start looking at templates?

    I think it would be pretty funny (albeit hackneyed) if it turned out to be a pokemon. Jirachi?

  19. - Top - End - #709
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Kish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Optimystik View Post
    It's useful because it fits the requirements of not being a complete ass-pull while still being able to pull off the abilities that we have seen. Speculating on one particular creature is getting us nowhere, so why not start looking at templates?
    You mean exists-in-D&D templates or made-up ones? My problem with the idea of it being a template Rich made up stuck on an otherwise ordinary creature is that that would mean Rich's whole, "It is possible to guess...it isn't something I just made up for the story" is effectively not true; the important parts are something he made up and, as the evidence in the comic actively points away from whatever the base species is, it's not realistically possible to guess. Sometimes Rich forgets minor D&D rules (Stunning Fist allowing a Fortitude, not Will, save). Sometimes he deliberately changes things in minor ways (Plane Shifting succubus who energy drains with a touch of her hand and relishes combat unless she knows the enemy has a weapon that goes through her damage reduction). Yanking his readers' chains by taking an ordinary creature, sticking a template he made up on that creature, and writing, "It's possible to guess, it's not something I made up," though? That doesn't sound like Rich to me. He's a giant, not a genie.

    I know effectively nothing about pokemon, so I don't know if one might fit everything the creature in the darkness has done.
    Last edited by Kish; 2009-07-31 at 03:54 PM.

  20. - Top - End - #710
    Banned
     
    Milskidasith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    I'm just curious, but what are all the problems with the Pit Fiend theory? Besides the fact the MITD is pretty small (even though he specifically states his dad is a lot bigger) and apparantly not Evil, I don't see him being too far off from that. Then again, I don't have SoD, so I'm missing some details.

  21. - Top - End - #711
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    I never said this template has to be made up. It might be a familiar template, on a familiar creature, but the combination of the two makes it unfamiliar.

  22. - Top - End - #712
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Meg's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Minnesota, ya?
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Maybe he's a grue? I've always wondered if the MItD is actually female, that would be sufficiently twist-y (I actually doubt it, but hey).

    ...And that is how I met your father.

  23. - Top - End - #713
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Skorj's updated MITD summary:
    1. Is either quite strong, or has psionic abilities that mimic great strength (stomp, knock Miko through wall)
    2. Has a high DR.
    3. Is organic/biological (expected to devour enemies whole, enjoys eating, experiences flatulence, is aware of sexuality).
    4. Is expected to be scary (by Xy, who knows scary), and has an extreme appearance (hideous or beautiful or both).
    5. Has a wish-like or gate-like SLA (or psionic power), probable wish-like give his expectations about "hoping really hard".
    6. Seems to need to sleep after using powerful abilities. This may be the best clue!
    7. His race can be guessed from the clues provided (not something Rich made up).
    8. Xy seems to expect Mitd to be both evil and tractable, (just interpretation of Xy's actions).

      Negatives:
    9. Cannot ususally speak (or perhaps speak common)
    10. Does not have amazingly high mental stats
    11. Not usually found in a jungle,
    12. Probably a youth so his current size may not mean much.

  24. - Top - End - #714
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Milskidasith View Post
    I'm just curious, but what are all the problems with the Pit Fiend theory? Besides the fact the MITD is pretty small (even though he specifically states his dad is a lot bigger) and apparantly not Evil, I don't see him being too far off from that. Then again, I don't have SoD, so I'm missing some details.
    Pit fiends don't have children. The MITD has a father (who "eats a lot").

    I'm stickin with my Carniverous Giant Space Hamster theory!

  25. - Top - End - #715
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Sanguine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Elemental Pole of Oil
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Skorj View Post
    Skorj's updated MITD summary:
    1. Is either quite strong, or has psionic abilities that mimic great strength (stomp, knock Miko through wall)
    2. Has a high DR.
    3. Is organic/biological (expected to devour enemies whole, enjoys eating, experiences flatulence, is aware of sexuality).
    4. Is expected to be scary (by Xy, who knows scary), and has an extreme appearance (hideous or beautiful or both).
    5. Has a wish-like or gate-like SLA (or psionic power), probable wish-like give his expectations about "hoping really hard".
    6. Seems to need to sleep after using powerful abilities. This may be the best clue!
    7. His race can be guessed from the clues provided (not something Rich made up).
    8. Xy seems to expect Mitd to be both evil and tractable, (just interpretation of Xy's actions).

      Negatives:
    9. Cannot ususally speak (or perhaps speak common)
    10. Does not have amazingly high mental stats
    11. Not usually found in a jungle,
    12. Probably a youth so his current size may not mean much.

    I have to say Red Dragon. The wish is granted via unknown sorcerer powers(obviously has some extra level as a Dragon that size can't normally cast 9th level spell.) And IIRC a Dragons only good mental ability is Charisma(Which could easily have.) Red Dragons aren't normally found in jungles, and the rest should be self-explanatory.
    Avatar by Elagune

  26. - Top - End - #716
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HamsterOfTheGod's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanguine View Post
    I have to say Red Dragon.
    Amethyst Dragon!
    Spoiler
    Show
    OotS Fan-fiction (An alternate OotS-verse starting after page 603. If you want to read it go here)

    bad Erf-poetry

    and other sillyness.

  27. - Top - End - #717
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    A question whose answer may support the non-D&D creature idea: Is the MitD the only major recurring character not to mention D&D rules? I suppose that could also indicate he is some kind of hyper-dimensional being (like a Lovecraftian horror or an actual god, as some have suggested) that does not operate on the OotSverse's laws of physics (and may also explain his problem with the Gates). Or maybe it just shows his naïveté to the world around him.
    THE SCRYING EYE AT THE END OF STRIP #698 WAS ZZ'DTRI'S (SOURCE)

  28. - Top - End - #718
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HamsterOfTheGod's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gift Jeraff View Post
    Is the MitD the only major recurring character not to mention D&D rules?
    Yes but his is the best roleplayer.
    Spoiler
    Show
    OotS Fan-fiction (An alternate OotS-verse starting after page 603. If you want to read it go here)

    bad Erf-poetry

    and other sillyness.

  29. - Top - End - #719
    Orc in the Playground
     
    lothos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by NYYanks6083 View Post
    I can't imagine no one's suggested this before, so I apologize if this has already been thrown out there, but what about some kind of epic-class dragon(like a force or prismatic)? It would explain the re-god-damn-diculous strength score, and his DR would be epic, so that fits the fact that he's pretty much invulnerable, and I'm fairly certain those dragons gain spells as a sorc as they get older, so there's your teleport. Also I think both of those dragons are usually good, and the MITD has shown that he's not evil.

    Just an idea...or even better, the Tarrasque? It fits the "great bull" description, and explains his strength, although the teleport not so much haha
    With regard to the Prismatic Dragon idea, I was not the first to propose it (hungerer was so far as I know), but I did write up some notes on why a Prismatic Dragon might fit well here. However after some debate, Nerdanel convinced me that it's not possible.

    Force Dragons don't fit too well in my opinion. As for the Tarrasque, I just don't rate it as a serious contender because the D&D source books are very clear that it's a unique, singular creature. We know MitD is part of a species from several sources both in Start of Darkness and the main strip. Of course Rich could have changed that, but it doesn't fit with this being something Rich didn't make up in my mind.

    Of all the D&D monsters, I'm still kind of hoping it s a variant dread linnorm with just one head (instead of two). I proposed it here. the problem is that as Grey Wolf pointed out, they have 2 heads. Other than than [sarcasm] minor [/sarcasm] detail, it does fit quite well in my opinion.

    I've combed MM1 to MM5 and read through the Epic Level Handbook. I also spent some time reading through 1st Edition AD&D books (MM, MM2 and Fiend Folio) but I've found nothing that I believe fits perfectly.

    I hope it is a D&D monster, but so many good candidates have been ruled out, unless there is some crazy combination of templates applied. The only one that I haven't seen a really strong proof against is the Dream Larve, which Nerdanel suggested here (and in other posts). Though Nerdanel has argued well for the Dream Larve, I'm not convinced myself.

    My opinion now is the MitD isn't a D&D Monster, but I'm yet to see a really compelling case for a monster that I'm personally familiar with. I jokingly proposed a Vorlon from Babylon 5 here and if you want to join the "Vorlon in the Darkness" fan club, you need only copy my signature. Remember, we are all Kosh.

    Whatever MitD is, I'd like to re-predict that I believe MitD will somehow meet another of his species (perhaps even his dad) in Kraagor's tomb at the final gate, right towards the end of the strip. This is based on strip 277 where it says:
    "She [Serini] decided she would fill it [Kraagor's Tomb] with the nastiest monsters in the world, to reflect his belief in the power of physical might".

    In my opinion, it would just fit the tone of the story well if MitD were to meet another of his kind in that Tomb, come to understand what/who he is and then decide to save the day when Xykon is on the threshold of defeating team good.
    Official Kosh of the Vorlon in the dark fan club
    -- Lothos now Half Orc in playground, other half also Orc --

  30. - Top - End - #720
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: MITD hypothetical species?

    Quote Originally Posted by lothos View Post
    I jokingly proposed a Vorlon from Babylon 5 here and if you want to join the "Vorlon in the Darkness" fan club, you need only copy my signature. Remember, we are all Kosh.
    Nah, doesn't fit the "My dad was much bigger than I am" and the always-hungry part...

    (Did we ever actually SEE a Vorlon eat? What the heck does a being composed of pure energy do for fuel? ).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •