Results 421 to 450 of 809
-
2010-03-21, 06:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Somewhere in NL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Well, we will have to agree to disagree. I consider that the actions of the elf commander were rational and militarily justifiable (although he displayed his hatred of goblinoids by "toying" with the prisoner before throwing him off the wall, which I find unpleasant). You think that the elf commander was blinded by his hatred of the goblinoids, and did not properly consider other options that might not have had to involve his killing the prisoner. I feel that nothing we could say to each other would budge us from our positions.
We have never found ourselves in a comparable situation, so we can only guess. I *guess* that, were I in his situation, I would have acted as he did (although without the "toying" part). And that, in a comparable real-world situation, a commander on the field would have also acted in a similar way. But those are only guesses on my part. Possibly, you would imagine yourself acting differently in this situation.
I imagine that a big part of our reaction to this strip is how we project ourselves in dealing with this kind of tactical situation, and what we would prioritize there.
[EDIT: Also, I very much subscribe to what Deliverance wrote in the post just before this one, which came in as I was typing]Last edited by JoseB; 2010-03-21 at 06:18 AM.
JoseB
o/` Ooooh, sweet mystery of liiiiiIIIIIiiife... o/`
-
2010-03-21, 06:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
Re: Was the elf commander Morally justified in killing the prisoner?
And this strip was there to remind people why the goblins had to do it against the Azurites
Especially since elves are racist bastards in most D&D worlds (and not only toward "inferior races" but also among their own subraces). Who thinks that Drow are worst hasn't read much about Sun ElvesLast edited by SoC175; 2010-03-21 at 06:30 AM.
-
2010-03-21, 06:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Jolly Old England
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Deliverance
Still, I think we have hit the fundamental point we disagree on, and so can go no further. But really, I'd just like to make my main, original point known again: The speciesism against and hatred of goblins is starting to feel a little overbearing. I wouldn't mind this strip, if in at least one other, someone (Other than OotS) would say "He may be a goblin, but he seems like a good person; let's not kill him."Last edited by Melamoto; 2010-03-21 at 06:44 AM.
Give me any character, and I will give you a freeform conversion.
-
2010-03-21, 06:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Scotland!
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Wow, ice freaking cold but as the elf openly admits he isn't a nice guy so not entirely unexpected.
Of course, they pull a knife, you pull a gun...
-
2010-03-21, 06:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Crete
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
The resistance could cast detect evil/lies on him.Racist and prejudiced elf!
Last edited by Sterm; 2010-03-21 at 06:47 AM.
Hope for the best,prepare for the worst.
-
2010-03-21, 06:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- R'lyeh
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
People saying a detect evil or discern lies would solve the problem: Yes, it would. No, it would not help. The casters are pretty busy with crucial assignments, to ensure the prisoners escape. Odds also are that they are very busy with their spell slots. Making Thahn and the Hobgoblin meet takes his attention from his duty. Escorting the hob to the tunnels is extremely risky as all it takes is a single round for him to shout a warning, or try to get away and cause a ruckus somewhere too close for comfort.
The elven commander's resources are limited, strictly, to those immediately around him, none of them seeming to have resources past sense motive checks.
As said before knowing that the resistance has the help of high level elves is much, much more than "resistance has high level people". It gives the City a target, and odds are it even facilitates scrying and fighting. The only reason the commander has to keep the goblin alive is compassion, which goes against every goal of the resistance under those circumstances.
It wasn't "a logically sound the decision", it was "the most sound decision possible".
And don't throw "but he was cruel" crap. I'm not denying that. His reasons as a commander were perfect, sound and smart.
-
2010-03-21, 07:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Crete
- Gender
-
2010-03-21, 07:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- R'lyeh
- Gender
-
2010-03-21, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
While I would certainly expect many able-bodied civilians to form some sort of citizen's militia during the defense and early stages of evacuation (before breaking and trying desperately to escape any way possible), I can't say that we have seen that in the comic. As far as I recall, every single Azurite we saw fighting, apart from the high-level criminals recruited out of prison because of being high-level, was in full armour.
Being in uniform armour, shields, and weapons mark them as definitely not being conscripted at the last minute unless handwaved away as graphical limitations. Had the author wished to imply that a significant part of those defending Azure City were last minute conscripts rather than part of a standing army or forces loyal to various nobles there were plenty of opportunities to do so.
Any defense by last minute conscripts getting conveniently killed off during the assault as active combatants rather civilian victims has happened off screen.
Almost all others are implied to have escaped in the fleet, since Hinjo does specifically make sure to fill up the many, many ships with as many people as he can.
Hinjo's desire to get every ship filled up with as many people as he can and then leave is unlikely to have significantly affected the shipping capacity.
As far as I recall, the author has neither implied nor told us in the comic how many people managed to escape from the city with the fleet and how many did not make it because it really doesn't matter for the purposes of the story. What matters for the story is that enough people made it out that Hinjo has the kernel of an army and has the worries of the leader of a country (even if one in exile) rather than merely those of a commander of a military force or group of refugees.
-
2010-03-21, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Really, this is obnoxious. "Your argument is stupid because I, magically, know what arguments people would make if something else had happened, and they're almost exactly the same, therefore your argument is without merit!" is semantically equivalent to, "You're wrong because because BECAUSE!" The commander made a statement of genocidal desires, which he had apparently made a large number of times previously. Keep trying to spin that as completely irrelevant and telling people what they'd say in different circumstances; clearly you're the smartest person here.
So they liquefied all the hobgoblin corpses similarly off-camera?
How did they prevent the use of other spells to learn what happened there?Last edited by Kish; 2010-03-21 at 07:28 AM.
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2010-03-21, 07:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
-
2010-03-21, 07:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Raleigh NC
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Popping back in to address some things ...
1) The usual defense is that the killing of the hobgoblin was militarily necessary.
.. I don't see it. I can understand and support killing a prisoner you can't prevent from escaping and raising the alarm on a special operations- type mission. As far as I can tell, however, it was not necessary. The hobgoblin was helpless and appeared to be completely at the elves' mercy. Since they had made provision for a band of squealing, undisciplined, noncombatant jail prisoners, certainly one additional hobgoblin properly bound and shackled and watched over by the other prisoners would cost no additional resources.
I would also argue that this course of action is *militarily harmful*. As I discussed in another thread, a conventional assault on one of the greatest fortifications in the OOTS world, manned by a numerically powerful army, has little hope unless you can sow dissension and treason among the defenders, and racial differences seem like a fruitful area for such operations. Making it clear that you'll kill them all regardless what they do will make the entire city fight like cornered rats. The elves' tactics may have doomed the battle for Azure City before it even began.
2) Another thought is 'because the hobgoblin was evil'.
First of all, we don't know that. Hobgoblins are 'usually lawful evil' in the SRD, not 'always evil'.
Second, whether the hobgoblin is good or evil is completely irrelevant from a military point of view. A person who has the 'evil' D&D descriptor can still be militarily useful. See: Belkar, Dark Vaarsuvius.
Another thing about evil is that it isn't a permanent condition. Evil people have repented and become good before. And even if they don't, they can still be made useful.
What was it Gandalf said ... "Many people live that deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too hasty to deal out death in judgement, for not even the wise can see all ends." They were speaking of sparing Gollum's life. They did, and because they did so they achieved an otherwise-impossible quest.
I point out, also, that Thanh is a paladin and would have nothing to do with this course of action. The people in-comic obviously recognize it as an evil act.
3) Some argue that 'goblins=good, azurites = evil'.
We don't know that. The goblins did massacre pretty much all the humans in the city and those they captured, they tortured for sport (remember whipping the old slave in line last book). Redcloak considers himself evil and has said so in-comic. The goblin clerics consider themselves evil too, from the same conversation.
The war to liberate azure city is a just war. The elves and humans are the good guys while the goblins are the bad guys.
BUT that doesn't automatically mean that everything the good guys do is legitimate and good. Fighting an evil villain doesn't automatically justify and make pure everything you do. Good people have committed evil deeds while fighting just wars. And sometimes the 'good' people have become so damaged after fighting these wars they no longer think of themselves as good. 'War' is a morally corrupting endeavor.
It is because of this I want to remind our readers of the words of a man who was sometimes wise ...
Originally Posted by Nietzche
And as Terry Pratchett said in Night Watch, if we're successful we find a middle point between impossible, neat-n-shiny perfection and the abyss so that we become a band of tired, dirty men doing a miserable job under tough circumcstances... but we can still have a measure of self-respect. Because while the Dark beckons us, we have not fallen wholly into it.
Respectfully,
Brian P.Last edited by pendell; 2010-03-21 at 07:43 AM.
-
2010-03-21, 07:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- In The Playground
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Wow. Elves are a-holes.
Last edited by Ikialev; 2010-03-21 at 07:44 AM.
-
2010-03-21, 07:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
I can't see how this is justifiable. The elves are in this for no good reason, only profit and some strange sense of racist justice, the goblins barely no better I know but this is irrelevant. Of course, in the sense that it is a great tactical disadvantage they have no choice at the moment (except for using detect evil, but whatever), but this is also irrelevant since they made the choice to kill that goblin and many other innocent goblins when they went to war with them. Unless they have some greater good at stake by not going to war (and that ends suddenly began to justify the means in DnD) this is just a demonstration to us that neither side is good, or even right.
-
2010-03-21, 07:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lyon (France)
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Woa, it took me something like 15 hours to notice the new comic and my post ends up on the 15th page ^^
Nevertheless the comic is awesome and so are the elves
I can't wait for the next one
-
2010-03-21, 07:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
-
2010-03-21, 07:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
-
2010-03-21, 08:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
In war it is often hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys.
-
2010-03-21, 08:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Was the elf commander Morally justified in killing the prisoner?
"Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman
-
2010-03-21, 08:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
-
2010-03-21, 08:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Whoa there. That was cold. Pragmatic, sure, and expected of someone in the Commander's line of work (hard military all the way, and someone used to doing special missions, accomplishing the objective at any cost), but what shone through there was complete disregard for the hobgoblin's life and a full lack of belief that it was even possible that a hobgoblin could be anything but a monster, that his life was worth the Truth spell their cleric would have to expend to determine his sincerity.
Of course, the argument "I'll help you because I'm SO intolerant of other races that I can't even stand the greenskins, to the point of assaulting one without cause, so I'll help you elves and humans" wasn't exactly convincing, either.
Interesting how Rich seems to be on a goblin sympathy roll here.
I also think there's a bit of foreshadowing here on the part of the Resistance commanders, whose names I can't remember. The hairbun dude seems at least somewhat appalled at the elf's ruthlessness and seems to recognise that there it was the sort of thing a paladin like Thanh would have a problem with. Eyepatch girl doesn't seem to see anything wrong with it at all. Of the two of them, hairbun dude is probably the one with more potential to view hobgoblins as equals, if adversaries. I could see this becoming a plot point in the future.
-
2010-03-21, 08:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Where the dragons are
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
You know what?
For centuries the humans and elves have threated the goblins like crap, butchering them for the lulz over and over just because they can.
They have been bullying the goblins since the dawn of creation.
But now the victims strike back against the bullies.
Face it, the azurites DESERVED getting their city sacked, what happened to them is not even a fraction of what they have done to the goblins so they have NO RIGHT to complain about it, and yet they do.
And now, instead of sitting down and accepting the CONSEQUENCES of THEIR OWN ACTIONS they start fighting back against their punishment.
Can't they just accept that karma has come back to bite them in the ass and move on? Must they continue their bullying and refuse to accept the punishment?
Frankly put, the goblins have the moral high ground here.
The humans and elves deserve anything they get, no matter how bad whatever happens to them is it won't even be close to fully pay back for everything they have done to the goblins over the centuries.
I'm invoking equivalent exchange here, for every bit of suffering the humans and elves have caused the goblins the goblins have the right to cause an equal amount.
By the way, V's genocide of 25% of the black dragon race means that according to equivalent exchange 25% of the elven race must die in return.
-
2010-03-21, 08:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Are we to believe that the goblin leadership would have acted any differently? They attacked the city, remember? How many people did they kill?
I think the elf's actions were clearly murder (killing a defenseless, shackled prisoner violates some pretty old Western military conventions). But I find it preferable to the goblins' conduct. (I'd take an American lieutenant who murdered Nazis over a Nazi...)Stone walls do not a prison make,
Nor iron bars, a cage
-
2010-03-21, 08:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
-
2010-03-21, 08:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2010-03-21, 08:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Considering the lack of bodies in 707? I'd guess they took them with them... especially considering The Commanders orders to take the most recent one with them.
Speak with Dead is a 3rd level Cleric spell (which is to say the same level as Animate Dead, and common enough that it could readily be used). The other spells are higher level and/or Arcane spells. The goblins don't have many Arcane casters... from Start of Darkness we know Clerics are *far* more common than mages among them.
Running the risks you HAVE to run doesn't excuse you for running the risks you don't have to run.Last edited by Dark Matter; 2010-03-21 at 08:22 AM.
-
2010-03-21, 08:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
Lemme put it this way. You killed someone's family, long time ago. Last week, their great-great-great-great grandchildren came a-knockin' on your door. They threw you and your family, everybody you know and loved out of your house, killed a few of them in the process. Would you accept that? Would you consider it karma coming back and biting you in the ass, therefore making it allright? Do the attackers have moral high ground here?
Frankly, I think what Rich is trying to say with this comic is, an eye for an eye and soon the whole world will be blind.Adrie, half elven bard. Drawing by Vulion, avatar by CheesePirate. Colored version by Callos_DeTerran. Thanks a lot, you guys.This place is not a place of honor…no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here… nothing valued is here."There will come a day so dark you will pray for death. On that day your prayers will be answered."Book of shadows, book of night, wake the beast and banish light.
-
2010-03-21, 08:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Was the elf commander Morally justified in killing the prisoner?
"Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman
-
2010-03-21, 08:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
There is a possibility that some of the human prisoners are goblinoid-spies in magical disguise or collaborator. Or magically bound to betray them at some point.
The hobgoblin prisoner might really have only been put there to make the resistance focus on him instead of any potential traitor amongst the newly freed azurite citizens.
A little bit of geas, a polymorph, or a hired doppelganger, and all the gobbotopia high command would have to do is to sacrifice a lowly hobgoblin soldier who's a little bit rough to lower their defenses.
-
2010-03-21, 08:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Where the dragons are
- Gender
Re: OOTS #707 - The Discussion Thread
{Scrubbed}
Last edited by Roland St. Jude; 2010-03-21 at 11:52 AM.