New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. - Top - End - #31
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2010

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by Tokuhara View Post
    sometimes, you need to self-regulate your characters so you don't outshine the party and someone doesn't have fun.
    This should work both ways. Sometimes others need to step up their game not to make you need to cripple yourself to the point your character is no longer fun to play.

  2. - Top - End - #32
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowbluff View Post
    But don't you get it? You will never master your demonic powers and you will kill yourself if your character dies!
    ...What did I just read.


    That is the worst DM ever. And the worst players ever (I could see why they'd want Marcie out of the game, though. She probably screams like that every time she fails a save). And the worst battlemat ever (5x10 squares? Seriously? And they have minis the size of soda cans).

    I guess it explains why people hate Divinations and play Sorcerers instead of Wizards, if Divinations and Wizards make you "an abomination unto the lord".
    Last edited by Slipperychicken; 2012-10-15 at 10:12 AM.

  3. - Top - End - #33
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Snowbluff's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2011

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by Slipperychicken View Post

    I guess it explains why people hate Divinations and play Sorcerers instead of Wizards, if Divinations and Wizards make you "an abomination unto the lord".
    Wait... what?

    She was totally playing a cleric in the third panel... unless it's a GESTALT CAMPAIGN! Gestalt is made of Satan!
    Avatar of Rudisplork Avatar of PC-dom and Slayer of the Internet. Extended sig
    GitP Regulars as: Vestiges Spells Weapons Races Deities Feats Soulmelds/Veils
    Quote Originally Posted by Darrin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowbluff View Post
    All gaming systems should be terribly flawed and exploitable if you want everyone to be happy with them. This allows for a wide variety of power levels for games for different levels of players.
    I dub this the Snowbluff Axiom.

  4. - Top - End - #34
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Xodion's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    UK

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by LordBlades View Post
    This should work both ways. Sometimes others need to step up their game not to make you need to cripple yourself to the point your character is no longer fun to play.
    The problem with this approach is that while you can almost certainly bring your character down to their level, they might not be able to bring their character up to yours. I play in two games with quite different levels of experience in D&D, and your approach would work for one group but not the other.

    The first game has me and another good optimiser as well as other experienced players, and while we both tend to play lower tier classes to not outshine the others we are all pretty optimised and have fun.

    The second game was aimed squarely at some of our friends who do not have much experience with D&D and are put off by the complexities of the mechanics, but still want to have a go and do some roleplaying. I am the only optimiser in this game, I have the power level turned right down and I still outshine at times though I try to minimise it. The DM and I have talked about what we can do to help the others shine more, and I am moving into more of a support/buff role to help them do better.

    I understand that not everyone would be happy in the second game, but my point is that you should be able to negotiate and arrange the power levels you are all happy with, and be aware of other people's wishes and capabilities. If you can't negotiate and you don't feel you can play at a power level you are happy with, then this is probably not the right group for you - nobody should be forcing anyone else to play in a way they do not want.
    DM: You exit the temple. Cleric, roll a knowledge(religion) check...
    Cleric: *passes* "Ah yes, now I recognise it, it was a temple to the god of traps!"
    Thief: *punches Cleric*

    Iron Chef Contest Gallery:
    Spoiler
    Show
    IC XVII: Snow (Silver)
    IC XX: Sir Karel (Bronze)
    IC XXXII: 'Aundair' Yannedge-Owens (Gold)
    IC XXXII: Sir Arminel Rayne (Bronze)
    IC XXXIX: Hardy (Bronze)


  5. - Top - End - #35
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    I am, what one might call, a voice of reasonable optimization. I was the one who originally taught my current group the game, and in doing so emphasized a more "concept before mechanics" philosophy, but as more campaigns began, and hence more character concepts emerged, I've nevertheless been the one to try and generally steer the other members away from the various pitfalls that lurk within the system (convincing the evoker not the ban transmutation, for instance). However, even if it is entirely possible to role-play, quite well, an optimized character, this invariably places mechanics before concept, thereby limiting what concepts a character can play with. Thus I tend to keep my suggestions to within a person's already chosen concept.
    "If your heart is fearful throw away fear; if there is terror in it throw away terror. Take your axe in your hand and attack. He who leaves the fight unfinished is not at peace." -The Epic of Gilgamesh

  6. - Top - End - #36
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Stillwater
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    I am in my group too. I like making the game easy, and get power-high. Like a kid, I like (relatively) big numbers. I just found out about chicken infested the other day, and considered asking the DM if I could play a Warforged Commoner 1 to get Survivor at level 2... And deal NI damage =P

    I ran two campaigns, and learned (roughly) how to balance power against the rest of the party, and how to help them have fun. Now I don't really mind playing at the group's level. Everyone has a role to fill anyway.

    Of course, the DM still doesn't trust me, since a few years ago we did the Hinterbite module and my first words were "okay, before I go into the town, I cast Planar Binding." He's used to a lower level of play, and recently was suspicious of my Lesser Aasimar character because he gets a +2 in Wisdom and Charisma without a -2 anywhere.
    Last edited by rockdeworld; 2012-10-15 at 11:46 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #37
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowbluff View Post
    Wait... what?

    She was totally playing a cleric in the third panel... unless it's a GESTALT CAMPAIGN! Gestalt is made of Satan!
    I was talking about the bible quote after the bottom panel.


    EDIT: The DM referred to Debbie's character as a Wizard in the 1st panel, and a Cleric in the 3rd... Either she's playing two characters (or there's some weird multiclass/gestalting going on), or the DM has no f***ing clue what she's doing.

    EDIT II: RPG Boogaloo: Maybe Debbie's Wizard died, so she rerolled as a Cleric who got to 8th level.
    Last edited by Slipperychicken; 2012-10-15 at 11:47 AM.

  8. - Top - End - #38
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Feb 2012

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    Quote Originally Posted by hymer View Post
    When I call optimization 'not inherently unproblematic', I mean pretty much what you describe, but I do believe the optimizer is just as much to blame for any problem developing as the non-optimizers.
    I fully agree with this. Maybe I just misread your initial post but I had read it as you putting all the blame on the optimizer. Equal blame (until one side makes concessions), I am fine with.
    Quote Originally Posted by SSGoW View Post
    95% of martial problems can be solved by Tome of Battle...

  9. - Top - End - #39
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: The Voice of Optimization

    While I lean heavily on the side of RP (D&D was made just for that) I do believe RP and optimization are independent. But there is a point where it blurs, that's when you bend the fluff to fit around the crunch. I think it should be the other way around and I really do think that D&D is made with this in mind, hence the little care for balance and all the broken stuff. Of course, maybe low-power campaigns where every player is a beggar with low ressources might not be your cup of tea. To each his preference.

    Also, lets not confuse optimizers for power gamers and munchkins. If you use a build you picked up on the internetz just so you can have an "I Win" button you are destroying the game. If everything in the campaign is high OP, you HAVE to build your character this way.
    Last edited by Zubrowka74; 2012-10-15 at 12:49 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •