New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 63 of 121 FirstFirst ... 133853545556575859606162636465666768697071727388113 ... LastLast
Results 1,861 to 1,890 of 3609
  1. - Top - End - #1861
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Sith_Happens's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Dromund Kaas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q 942

    Do you have line of sight to the other side of a wall with a small hole in it? If so, how small can the hole be?
    Revan avatar by kaptainkrutch.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cirrylius View Post
    That's how wizards beta test their new animals. If it survives Australia, it's a go. Which in hindsight explains a LOT about Australia.

  2. - Top - End - #1862
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 942 Yes, line of sight exists, but ask your DM how big or small the holes must be. PHB p 152 talks about arrow slits in its rules on varying degree of cover, but doesn't say how big. Stronghold Builder's Guidebook is silent on the size of arrow slits and murder holes.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  3. - Top - End - #1863
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q 943

    What's the deal with the Psychoactive Skin of Ectoplasmic Armor (complete psionic) : it gives you a +8 armor, just like Bracers of armor +8, at the ridiculous price of 3000 gp.
    Can someone explain to me if that's a typo or if there's a catch somewhere ?
    Last edited by Shaynythyryas; 2013-02-27 at 08:11 AM.

  4. - Top - End - #1864
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    memnarch's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In the mind.

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaynythyryas View Post
    Q 943

    What's the deal with the Psychoactive Skin of Ectoplasmic Armor (complete psionic) : it gives you a +8 armor, just like Bracers of armor +8, at the ridiculous price of 3000 gp.
    Can someone explain to me if that's a typo or if there's a catch somewhere ?
    (Renumbered) A943

    Bracers don't cause a reduction in maximum dexterity, an armor check penalty, or an arcane spell failure chance. The bracers also provide a bonus to touch AC since they are a force effect. The skin of ectoplasmic armor? Made of ectoplasm so it does not.

    A better comparison might be full plate. It's not perfect, but full plate has a lot of the same downsides as well.
    If you want a OotS style Touhou avatar, send me a request.

    Steam name: memnarch. Same avatar.

  5. - Top - End - #1865
    Surgebinder in the Playground Moderator
     
    Douglas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by memnarch View Post
    The bracers also provide a bonus to touch AC since they are a force effect.
    No, they do not. The force effect aspect of them makes them effective against incorporeal touch attacks specifically, not touch attacks in general.
    Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.

    Avatar by Ceika.

    Archives:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
    Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
    Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
    Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)

  6. - Top - End - #1866
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Lands of Noobaria
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q944
    Oriental Adventure is 3.5e (according to official errata 02/16/2006)?
    Last edited by Kred; 2013-02-27 at 11:44 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #1867
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 944

    If you apply, in order, the Oriental Adventures Errata file (dated as you specified), everything from the 3.5 update article in Dragon # 318 on pages 32-48, and the Free D&D® v.3.5 Accessory Update booklet (available here — renamed and updated skills, feats, spells, & c.), then your Oriental Adventures will be ready for use in a 3.5 D&D game.

  8. - Top - End - #1868
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A943 additional

    The price was updated to 6,000 gp in Magic Item Compendium (page 170).
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  9. - Top - End - #1869
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Lands of Noobaria
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q945
    Crippling Strike (Ex)
    A rogue with this ability can sneak attack opponents with such precision that her blows weaken and hamper them. An opponent damaged by one of her sneak attacks also takes 2 points of Strength damage. Ability points lost to damage return on their own at the rate of 1 point per day for each damaged ability.
    So, if i do 3 sneak attack in round, a foe will takes 2 points of Strength damage?

  10. - Top - End - #1870
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 945

    The wording is a little awkward, but I'm pretty sure it should be 2 points of Strength damage per Sneak Attack (so 6 total if all three attacks hit).
    Last edited by KillianHawkeye; 2013-02-27 at 01:22 PM.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  11. - Top - End - #1871
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q: 946

    in the eberron campaign setting book, pg 268. what slot dose the warforged component (battlefist) take up, it says its a +1 weapon, but resembles a gauntlet.

  12. - Top - End - #1872
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q 947

    Are there any special rules for tripping (i.e. unhorsing) a rider?

    Q 948

    Are there special rules for tripping a mount?

    Q 949

    If the attacker's reach is greater than that of the target of a tripping attempt, the target does not get an AoO, right?

    Q 950

    Does a Boneclaw (MMIII p. 17) have 20 ft reach for special attacks (trip, grapple etc.) as well as normal attacks?

  13. - Top - End - #1873
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 948 No.

    The standard rules for Trip attempts already include provisions for creatures which are of larger size, and with more than two legs. The DM is free to add a circumstance penalty for the burden of having a rider on its back, but that's optional.

    A 949 Right.

    An attack of opportunity is a melee attack. You can only make melee attacks where you can reach.

    A 950 Yes.

    Reach is reach, whether Extraordinary or natural.
    Last edited by Curmudgeon; 2013-02-27 at 05:36 PM.

  14. - Top - End - #1874
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 947

    The standard rules for tripping already include a proviso for tripping (i.e. unmounting) a mounted creature.

    The defender is allowed a Ride check instead of the normal Strength or Dexterity check to resist the trip attempt.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  15. - Top - End - #1875
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    EvilClericGuy

    Join Date
    May 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q 951

    If I have an insight inherent bonus to my Str score (due to wish or reding a tome manual) do I keep it during wild shape? What about bonuses given by VoP?
    Last edited by Melnir; 2013-02-27 at 08:38 PM.

  16. - Top - End - #1876
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Melnir View Post
    Q 951

    If I have an insight bonus to my Str score (due to wish or reding a tome) do I keep it during wild shape? What about bonuses given by VoP?
    That should be an inherent bonus - which is what tomes and wishes grant.

    A 951: No.

    Wild Shape is based on alternate form, which states the following:

    The creature gains the physical ability scores (Str, Dex, Con) of its new form. It retains the mental ability scores (Int, Wis, Cha) of its original form. Apply any changed physical ability score modifiers in all appropriate areas with one exception: the creature retains the hit points of its original form despite any change to its Constitution.
    If the inherent (from tomes or wish) or enhancement (from VoP) bonus are applied to Str, Dex, or Con, the bonuses do not apply in wild shape. Mental ability score bonuses still apply. (See below)
    Last edited by mattie_p; 2013-02-27 at 09:10 PM.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  17. - Top - End - #1877
    Titan in the Playground
     
    TuggyNE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A951a: No. While inherent bonuses from wish or tomes are a part of your character, and cannot be dispelled or removed, they only apply instantaneously to your native ability scores, and since Wild Shape is based on Alternate Form and thus substitutes new physical ability scores, you don't gain the inherent bonuses to those. (That is, they permanently and non-magically increase your base ability scores, rather than providing a continuous magical bonus to your current scores.)

    (Partially ninja'd, but additional reasoning here.)

    A951b dispute: Yes. Vow of Poverty is Su, and Alternate Form does not remove Su abilities or bonuses, which are applied to your current ability scores.
    Quote Originally Posted by Water_Bear View Post
    That's RAW for you; 100% Rules-Legal, 110% silly.
    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    "Common sense" and "RAW" are not exactly on speaking terms
    Projects: Homebrew, Gentlemen's Agreement, DMPCs, Forbidden Knowledge safety, and Top Ten Worst. Also, Quotes and RACSD are good.

    Anyone knows blue is for sarcas'ing in · "Take 10 SAN damage from Dark Orchid" · Use of gray may indicate nitpicking · Green is sincerity

  18. - Top - End - #1878
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 951

    Your question is a bit confusing. Wish does not grant any insight bonuses to Strength, and no Tome grants any bonuses to Strength. However, there is a general rule for Wild Shape and other versions of Alternate Form.
    The creature gains the physical ability scores (Str, Dex, Con) of its new form. It retains the mental ability scores (Int, Wis, Cha) of its original form. Apply any changed physical ability score modifiers in all appropriate areas with one exception: the creature retains the hit points of its original form despite any change to its Constitution.
    If you have a modifier to Strength which is not specific to your original form, you apply it when you use Wild Shape. Check with your individual DM about whether particular Strength modifiers are tied to your form or not.

  19. - Top - End - #1879
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Drackstin View Post
    Q: 946

    in the eberron campaign setting book, pg 268. what slot dose the warforged component (battlefist) take up, it says its a +1 weapon, but resembles a gauntlet.
    before this gets over looked, can someone tell me what slot the battlefist takes up.

  20. - Top - End - #1880
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mattie_p's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    <<Undetected>>
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by tuggyne View Post
    A951b dispute: Yes. Vow of Poverty is Su, and Alternate Form does not remove Su abilities or bonuses, which are applied to your current ability scores.
    While an exalted feat is (Su) per p39 of BoED, the specific benefit of VoP is found under Voluntary Poverty on p30, same book. "Ability Score Enhancement (Ex):" Extraordinary has special rules for alternate form. :

    Quote Originally Posted by SRD
    • The creature loses the natural weapons, natural armor, and movement modes of its original form, as well as any extraordinary special attacks of its original form not derived from class levels (such as the barbarian’s rage class feature).
    • The creature gains the natural weapons, natural armor, movement modes, and extraordinary special attacks of its new form.
    • The creature retains the special qualities of its original form. It does not gain any special qualities of its new form.
    Are the benefits from VoP a special attack, or a special quality? Are they tied to your original form? Ask your DM.
    Last edited by mattie_p; 2013-02-27 at 09:09 PM.
    Blank 3.5 Character Creator Iron Chef Style Tables (in Google Sheets)

    Chairman Emeritus of Zinc Saucier.

    Avatar by Derjuin, sing her praises to Elysium.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    So now you're claiming that spellcasting "lacks a clear, supernatural element?" Being supernatural is literally the only point of magic.

  21. - Top - End - #1881
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A946

    It's a gauntlet, so it takes a weapon slot. You could wear 2 if you want.
    Handbook in Process:Getting the Facts Straight: A Guide to the Factotum

    Homebrew:
    Spoiler
    Show
    The Singular Band: There can be only one
    Khayal: A monster class worth playing


    Quote Originally Posted by Deophaun View Post
    Player: I'll use a classic ploy. "Help! Guards! He's having a seizure!"
    DM: You're the only one in the prison.
    Player: I'm very convincing.
    DM: And there are no guards.
    Player: But there's masonry.
    DM: It's not even animate, let alone sentient.
    Player: That's ok. I'll take the penalty.

  22. - Top - End - #1882
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q952

    Can an Artificer (Eberron) with the Metamagic Spell Completion apply multiple metamagic feats to the same scroll? Imagine that he wants to Empower and Quicken a scroll of Cure Critical Wounds. This is effectively an 10th level spell, and would require a UMD roll against DC 50 to succeed. However the rules say "a" metamagic feat. If the artificer knows several, can he apply multiple feats, assuming he can make the UMD roll?
    Last edited by thompsja; 2013-02-27 at 10:00 PM.

  23. - Top - End - #1883
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2009

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q953: Not including the slight difference in weight and cost, and the bump up from d4 to d6, are there any advantages to daggers over short swords?

  24. - Top - End - #1884
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Guigarci View Post
    A946

    It's a gauntlet, so it takes a weapon slot. You could wear 2 if you want.
    so a gauntlet is a different slot then a bracer?

  25. - Top - End - #1885
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    A 953

    A dagger is a simple weapon; a character with only simple weapon proficiency would incur nonproficiency penalties when wielding a short sword, but not a dagger. A dagger can also be thrown without improvised weapon penalties. Daggers can deal piercing damage like the short sword, or (at the wielder's option) slashing damage instead. Finally, there are a number of class and feat options available to dagger users but not short sword users (examples: Daggerspell Mage, Daggerspell Shaper, and Invisible Blade prestige classes; Bear Fang and Crescent Moon feats).

  26. - Top - End - #1886
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    BlackDragon

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Drackstin View Post
    so a gauntlet is a different slot then a bracer?
    Yes, but is the same as gloves.
    Handbook in Process:Getting the Facts Straight: A Guide to the Factotum

    Homebrew:
    Spoiler
    Show
    The Singular Band: There can be only one
    Khayal: A monster class worth playing


    Quote Originally Posted by Deophaun View Post
    Player: I'll use a classic ploy. "Help! Guards! He's having a seizure!"
    DM: You're the only one in the prison.
    Player: I'm very convincing.
    DM: And there are no guards.
    Player: But there's masonry.
    DM: It's not even animate, let alone sentient.
    Player: That's ok. I'll take the penalty.

  27. - Top - End - #1887
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
    no Tome grants any bonuses to Strength.
    Technically no Tome grants a bonus to any Physical Ability Score. The books that increase Physical Ability Scores are called Manuals but have rules that are analogue to the Tomes.

  28. - Top - End - #1888
    Titan in the Playground
     
    ElfRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Imagination Land
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by Andezzar View Post
    Technically no Tome grants a bonus to any Physical Ability Score. The books that increase Physical Ability Scores are called Manuals but have rules that are analogue to the Tomes.
    This is the RAW thread. Details matter here.
    "Nothing you can't spell will ever work." - Will Rogers

    Watch me draw and swear at video games.

  29. - Top - End - #1889
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Quote Originally Posted by KillianHawkeye View Post
    This is the RAW thread. Details matter here.
    That is why I clarified that. From Curmudgeon's post you could get the idea that there are no books that grant an inherent bonus to strength.

  30. - Top - End - #1890
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Sugashane's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2012

    Default Re: Simple Q&A D&D 3.5 (by RAW) XXII

    Q 954
    Can someone please show me the math to properly figure this out? My DM disagreed with the math on my other thread but didn't bother to help me do it right.

    Here is my character
    My large LVL 12 fighter with 30 STR (+10) using a large greatsword (3d6 +15)

    Feats include:
    Power attack (+12)
    Shock trooper's heedless charge (why above can go to +12)
    Leap attack modifier
    Battle Jump (Unapproachable east)
    ________________________________
    Leap Attack Errata-
    "The second sentence of the Benefit paragraph should
    read as follows:
    If you cover at least 10 feet of horizontal distance with
    your jump, and you end your jump in a square from
    which you threaten your target, you deal +100% the
    normal bonus damage from your use of the Power
    Attack feat."
    __________________________________


    What would my average attack be if charging? (With the drop from Battle Jump)
    When my Valorous Greatsword is finished being made, how would this affect my damage?

    Thank you.
    Last edited by Sugashane; 2013-02-28 at 03:14 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •