Results 151 to 180 of 2000
-
2014-11-15, 09:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Fith layer of Heck.
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Materia functions very similarly to dust, true. However, materia's origins are something to consider as well, as it is highly plot relevant for FF7. No spoilers as this is stuff you learn literally near the start of the game. Materia is the crystallized life force of the planet. While you learn (much later) that materia can form naturally and not be harmful to the planet, artificially mass producing Materia drains life from the planet.
Now then, as Materia is literally the congealed blood of the planet, this raises a question. Namely, why Dust was compared directly with Materia. Monty has hinted there is more to Dust than the people know, and the WoR on Dust said so. Is this hinting that Dust is crystallized planetary life force?
-
2014-11-15, 10:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
What makes a pocket dimension, of which we have no evidence or precedence for whatsoever, any more plausible than telepathy or shared dreaming?
In this case, I suspect god (as in, word of god) was talking about how dust functions and what it can do, rather than where it came from. But, it is definitely possible they've borrowed this element as well.
Personally, I still think the most likely candidate is that it came from the moon blowing up.
"My Hobby: Replacing your soap with gravy" by rtg0922, Doll and Clint "Rawhide" Eastwood by Sneak
-
2014-11-15, 10:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
It's hard to say what is or isn't possible. The rules of the world are delivered in bite-sized chunks. But yeah, it probably is a dream sequence of some sort.
My FFRP characters. Avatar by Ashen Lilies. Sigatars by Ashen Lilies, Gullara and Purple Eagle.
Interested in the Nexus FFRP setting? See our Discord server.
-
2014-11-15, 10:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
.........
In the post you just quoted, I said that the precedence was the existence of a portal ability. But if that's not enough for you, there's also the small canister that managed to hold Zwei and 30 cans of dog food. Where is that being held if not some kind of pocket space?
In contrast, the evidence there is for shared dreaming is "the sides of the background are fuzzy in one of the shots, so obviously, it's a dream."
To be frank, I don't really believe in either scenario. I still think this is taking place in the real world.
-
2014-11-15, 10:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
In the post I had quoted, you claimed precedence from a portal ability. I dispute that a portal ability in any way, shape, or form, serves as any form of evidence, precedence or connection to pocket dimensions. Essentially, what do pocket dimensions have to do with portals? They are neither required nor implied by the existence of portals.
Being able to fit into a smaller space than is possible is a better connection, but still not a direct link to pocket dimensions existing.
"My Hobby: Replacing your soap with gravy" by rtg0922, Doll and Clint "Rawhide" Eastwood by Sneak
-
2014-11-15, 11:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Suggesting that remarkable compression abilities implies a pocket dimension doesn't quite work. IIRC we know that's not the case with say Jaune's shield/scabbard being just retractable so really an inconvenient scabbard. Everything like Coco's Doombag could simply be getting denser rather then going into some extra dimensional space.
Of course its strictly speaking just irrational bias that leads us to try and explain things from an Earth perspective at all. Why do we suppose atoms? Because we are used to them and believe them to be true thanks to our education teaching us so. Which is all well and good... but we technically don't generally receive much evidence this applies to any fictional realm.
Now and while certainly a reasonable premise for an story set in "the real world" even there you will see plenty of deviation for dramatic convenience. Which from a scientific perspective something like broken glass not cutting people up or being thrown back by a gun would be evidence of different natural laws. Which given the elegant simplicity of a lot of them can have radical logical implications. We ignore them though because its not important to the story and just say that its "plot powers" rather then take the really long and annoying sidebar into the implication with respect to actual science. Since nobody involved except a very small percent of the audience is going to have the technical skill to do so. Its still there though even for fairly realistic media.
For a fantasy world though the case stretches even thinner as you get into more and more fantastic.
We might be playing with Dust as the singular elementary particle of the RWBY'verse for example, the literally nothing is NOT Dust. The moon's oddities I still suspect could be actively disproving universal gravitation, as celestial movements are some of the most elegantly simple and thus unyielding facets of the universe. You'd need something very particular to engineer chunks coming off your moon I'd think.
Not that I think Monty & Co really have a complete alternate set of natural laws cooked up, but its still you know there that our assumptions don't really have a foundation of evidence beyond our own imported Earth bias. We haven't had science class in universe AFAIK, just vague exposition bomb specials.
-
2014-11-15, 01:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
So what you're suggesting is that Zwei and the 30 cans of dog food are just being physically compacted in a way that all of them can be fit in a space that's about the size of a thermos...without killing Zwei in the process.
Sure.
Of course its strictly speaking just irrational bias that leads us to try and explain things from an Earth perspective at all. Why do we suppose atoms? Because we are used to them and believe them to be true thanks to our education teaching us so. Which is all well and good... but we technically don't generally receive much evidence this applies to any fictional realm.
We might be playing with Dust as the singular elementary particle of the RWBY'verse for example, the literally nothing is NOT Dust.
Dust is clearly more akin to a fossil fuel in its abundance and use, and it's around 99.99999% more likely that the particles that make up matter in Remnant are atoms, not Dust.
The moon's oddities I still suspect could be actively disproving universal gravitation, as celestial movements are some of the most elegantly simple and thus unyielding facets of the universe. You'd need something very particular to engineer chunks coming off your moon I'd think.
-
2014-11-15, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Pym Particles are no more/less magical then a Bag of Holding.
And 99.99999...% of your body is empty space already.
How is that an "irrational" bias? I mean, it's definitely a bias, but one I think is all too reasonable to have. Assume that fictional worlds are like real life unless otherwise noted. Because the writers are also working under the frame of reference and bias of the real world. No one has time to reconfirm that gravity is still a force of attraction and that people breath oxygen. If we spent time debating whether or not something keeps real-world properties every time it hasn't been explicitly confirmed or denied to be doing so, we'd never be able to talk about anything.
Now there are places worth applying it... but a fantasy world with no connection to our own? Why? Habit is the only reason.
And you can suggest that the creators must be working from a common frame of reference, but if they deviate from that they are showing evidence they are in fact not. RWBY does that plenty. While presuming the creators want the same type of technobabble you do might be informative, its not authoritative to say that "oh that's clearly how things must work!" when they aren't explaining how something works.
Is a pocket dimension a dimension a possible explanation? Sure. It is merely a hypothesis though.
[QUOTE]If that was the case, then there wouldn't be these discussions about Dust being a finite resource and these not-so-subtle hints that the Dust is going to run out sometime soon. How exactly are you going to run out of the elementary particles as long as matter exists?
The universe we live in isn't running out of anything either.
Dust is clearly more akin to a fossil fuel in its abundance and use, and it's around 99.99999% more likely that the particles that make up matter in Remnant are atoms, not Dust.
Pretty sure the moon wasn't like that originally. Someone or something blew it up. It's even in one of the song lyrics.
-
2014-11-15, 05:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
And I doubt that shrink/growth rays are being used, due to the particular manner in which all of the cans and the dog fall out of the container. They all fall out at normal size, which means if they were shrunk, they'd have to be expanding during the fall while inside the container, all without rupturing the container during the process, and without any sort of external stimuli to initiate the regrowth process.
What's likely is that the writers threw in packing Zwei and the cans in for a quick and lazy visual gag without considering the consequences that commercial shrink/growth and pocket dimension technology would have on the world. Because either of them should have had significantly more impact on the series than convenient mail.
If you are aware that it is a bias then you should know why it is fairly labelled irrational.
Now there are places worth applying it... but a fantasy world with no connection to our own? Why? Habit is the only reason.
And you can suggest that the creators must be working from a common frame of reference, but if they deviate from that they are showing evidence they are in fact not. RWBY does that plenty. While presuming the creators want the same type of technobabble you do might be informative, its not authoritative to say that "oh that's clearly how things must work!" when they aren't explaining how something works.
We should take the "like reality unless otherwise noted" approach because we're human, but more importantly, because all writers are human (save for the occasional computers, which are still built by humans). Writers are all working off of the inherent biases that stem from living in this reality. When is the last time you've seen a story about a truly alien world or universe? Where the reality is absurd as something like a world where matter is made of chicken and has five states: funnybone, gnu, glubark, luminous, and fritter. Where the concepts of up, down, left, and right don't exist? Where gravity pushes you sideways and electromagnetism isn't even a thing? Worlds like this are usually created for the express purpose of being a chaos world, and even they're limited by the writer's perspectives as a human being living on our reality's Earth. Despite elements from those chaos worlds not existing in reality, humans can still conceptualize them, otherwise, they wouldn't be able to be written.
The average fantasy or science fiction universe has much, much, much more in common with ours than the absurdist chaos worlds I described above. The number of areas where they deviate from ours, be it the existence of magic, a new element that makes the technology run, more inhabitable worlds than would be statistically likely, lifeforms that aren't based on carbon, or anything else, is a lot less than the number of areas where they've stayed the same. So to have any sort of meaningful frame of reference on how these worlds work, it's much more productive to have a stance that says "like reality unless otherwise noted," as opposed to "don't assume it's like reality unless explicitly told."
The universe we live in isn't running out of anything either.
Why?
And unless that is very recent the moon should have cleaned up those bits of itself. Especially as close as they are.
-
2014-11-15, 06:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
-
2014-11-15, 06:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
-
2014-11-15, 08:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- The Chi
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
I was going to warn you Gespenst Ritter will take great issue with anyone suggesting we don't assume scientific laws as a general rule (and there's some mysterious logical reason for that), but looks like I'm way too late.
For the record I would agree, and RWBY would hardly be the only fantasy world that posits four elements and has humans made up of them.
I wouldn't want to go so far as to say everything everything is made of dust. If everything in the universe is literally made up of dust, then dust itself isn't anything special (ok its still stuff in the rawest form but still). For one, I would posit grimm are actual imaginary beings, the manifestation of negative emotions (which is why they have no soul or substance after being killed). I do think we have a so many systematic violations of physics in RWBY-verse it is best to add RWBY to the list of universes in which totally different laws that apply. The Giant has suggested the same applies to OOTS, and other fantasy authors (Terry Prachett) have explicitly said so for their universe.
This means we couldn't have the same sort systematic understanding about how RWBY world works, but heck, I don't see why we can't have a childs-level of understanding about RWBY-world physics (as in: we see things fall, we expect things to fall unless they are cool enough to defy gravity, or people forgot to look down and so on).The laws of physics are not crying in a corner, they are bawling in the forums.
Thanks to half-halfling for the avatar
-
2014-11-15, 10:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
A question has been raised about the definition of plausible deniability, so I thought I'd help to clarify that.
Plausible deniability was originally coined by the CIA and referred to deliberately not telling your superiors of certain illegal actions you were taking, so that if the actions were exposed, the superiors could truthfully deny all knowledge of your actions and use you as a scapegoat. You can read more about it on the Wikipedia page here.
However, the term has expanded since it was originally coined. Plausible deniability now refers to any instance of arranging the pieces on a chessboard so that when an action is exposed, you can plausibly deny any knowledge and/or involvement of it.
This is the section from Wikipedia most referent to the RWBY thread:
"In [...] espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a powerful player or intelligence agency to pass the buck and avoid blowback by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on their behalf by a third party ostensibly unconnected with the major player."
e.g. If there's anyone, anywhere, in the council or other powerful players, who would target or reprimand Ozpin for sending scouts (or these scouts in particular) to investigate the situation, Ozpin could plausibly deny any involvement and demonstrate that this was just a training mission for students to clean out a very real grimm infestation.
Furthermore, and more generally, "plausible deniability can also apply to any act that leaves little or no physical evidence of wrongdoing or abuse", and is also a legal concept. However, this definition is probably a bit too broad, as the situation is already covered under the espionage definition above.
"My Hobby: Replacing your soap with gravy" by rtg0922, Doll and Clint "Rawhide" Eastwood by Sneak
-
2014-11-16, 10:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Canuckistan
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Pretty sure the
Iron DogeZwei container gag was just there for rule of funny.
RWBY isn't XMEN or Lord of the Rings, where every little detail is foreshadowing and must be considered in continuity with everything else. Sometimes writers literally just put in derp for the sake of derpy stuff happening. Unless you guys also want to argue that Ruby really turns into a floating balloon doll, and tactical implications thereof.
-
2014-11-16, 11:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- The Chi
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
The laws of physics are not crying in a corner, they are bawling in the forums.
Thanks to half-halfling for the avatar
-
2014-11-16, 01:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
-
2014-11-16, 05:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
-
2014-11-16, 06:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
-
2014-11-17, 02:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Canuckistan
- Gender
-
2014-11-17, 02:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
-
2014-11-17, 03:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Canuckistan
- Gender
-
2014-11-17, 05:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
"My Hobby: Replacing your soap with gravy" by rtg0922, Doll and Clint "Rawhide" Eastwood by Sneak
-
2014-11-17, 05:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
-
2014-11-17, 06:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Spoiler: Copious detailsIt's just a mocked up image from the original Red trailer slapped onto a no longer being sold PSP (not even a Vita).
However, there is a game being worked on, with the guy who made the fan game RWBY: Grimm Eclipse being hired by Rooster Teeth to work on it.
"My Hobby: Replacing your soap with gravy" by rtg0922, Doll and Clint "Rawhide" Eastwood by Sneak
-
2014-11-17, 12:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- The Chi
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
The laws of physics are not crying in a corner, they are bawling in the forums.
Thanks to half-halfling for the avatar
-
2014-11-18, 09:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Fith layer of Heck.
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
-
2014-11-18, 11:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
I doubt this because every semblance seen so far has only lasted for as long as the user concentrates on it. Given that Taiyang (is there offical word that he is Yang and Ruby's father? I thought he was the housekeeper or something) is miles away, he's either very good at focusing on a dog in tube that's who knows where or we have another reason to go Sibill Fawlty on Monty Oum for not explaining things.
There's also the fact that unless Taiyang is an overworked weaponsmith, this doesn't explain all the impossibly collapsible weapons. It doesn't stop space distortion being Zwei's semblance, though...Spoiler: Pixel avatar and Raincloud Durkoala were made by me. The others are the work of Cuthalion.
Cuteness and Magic and Phone Moogles, oh my! Let's Watch Card Captor Sakura!Sadly on asmallhiatus.
Durkoala reads a book! It's about VR and the nineties!
-
2014-11-18, 05:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
-
2014-11-19, 11:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
The dialogue suggests that they're more surprised that he sent a dog in the mail, as opposed to being surprised that he could fit a dog in the mail. When's the last time you've seen someone put living things in a bag of holding, and wasn't considered weird for doing so?
Besides Pokemon.
-
2014-11-19, 01:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- The Chi
- Gender
Re: RWBY VI: This thread is also a gun
Taiyang Xiao Long is confirmed to be the father of Yang Xiao Long and Ruby Rose. There are a ridiculous number of impossibly collapsible weapons floating around, with Coco's purse-vulcan-cannon taking the cake, or the coffee, as it were. Were it not for the ridiculous size of that thing, you could chalk up, say Ruby's gun-scythe to rule of cool.
Individually, there are explanations for the collapsible-weapons, Zwei's mailtube, and Penny's backpack. Taken together, its obvious there is only one plausible explanation left: The TARDIS crash-landed on Remnant.Last edited by Reddish Mage; 2014-11-19 at 01:31 PM.
The laws of physics are not crying in a corner, they are bawling in the forums.
Thanks to half-halfling for the avatar