Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Rules on discussion of religion
-
2017-08-14, 03:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
Rules on discussion of religion
The rules about discussing real world religion are apparently a bit ambiguous. I always took it to refer to extant religions that are still practiced, but recently a thread about ancient mythology was closed on the basis that it fell in the realm of religious topics. I feel that if mythology is to be included as a banned topic than this should be explicitly stated in the forum rukes
"If you want to understand biology don't think about vibrant throbbing gels and oozes, think about information technology" -Richard Dawkins
Omegaupdate Forum
WoTC Forums Archive + Indexing Projext
PostImage, a free and sensible alternative to Photobucket
Temple+ Modding Project for Atari's Temple of Elemental Evil
Morrus' RPG Forum (EN World v2)
-
2017-08-14, 04:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dijon, France
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
Agreed, if we start to close threads that delve into mythology, you might as well invest in red ink as the closure rate of threads will go through the roof, though moderators have repeatedly reinforced (usually here on the Board/Site Issues area) that any reference outside 'obvious' non-real world subjects (such as D&D Dwarves, being fictional vs Dwarves in folktales/myths, being quasi-religious due to their ties to a religious story) is verboten. But it is interesting to see a pattern develop where threads are closed *before* they go off into a no-go zone (and therefore are within the board rules), rather than scrub a thread or issue a warning to keep things on track ...
Last edited by Maelstrom; 2017-08-14 at 04:59 AM.
-
2017-08-14, 08:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
The rules seem clear enough to me:
Inappropriate Topics
- Real-world religions (including religious reactions to gaming)
- Real-world politics (including political reactions to gaming)
Grey WolfInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-08-14, 09:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
You can talk about fictional versions of mythology, e.g. Thor in D&D, Thor in OotS, or Thor in Marvel. What you cannot do is go on to discuss real-world/historical Thor.
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2017-08-14, 11:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- UK
- Gender
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
Also, there are a fair number of people who try to follow their best understanding of some of those "old religions" we might expect to be dead.
Case in point, about 30 years ago my brother wrote a letter to a UK religious newspaper which got published. The topic was something about teenagers and why they might have difficulties with their spirituality. His letter actually made it clear that he did not, but he still received over 100 letters that were trying to suggest religions (or versions there of) for him to follow.
One of these letters was extolling the worship of Odin and the Norse gods - so the religion (or a modern version of it) was still active 30 years ago; I doubt if it now dead.
Result: if you don't want to offend people by your discussion of their religion it is best to avoid all real-world religions (tbh some people will be offended by discussions of a fictional version of the religion); thus the Playground's rule of no discussion of any real world religon is an eminently sensible rule.
-
2017-08-14, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
One thing to remember is that the mod team has plenty to do in their own time, and can't go too in-depth into every post here. So if a generally okay topic (say, one of the comic threads) has a few posts about real-world mythology, those can easily slip under the radar. Every set of rules has a few instances where they get broken in the real world, and nobody notices because nothing comes of it.
If a topic blatantly talks about real-world mythology, though, that opens up a very tricky can of worms. If norse or greek mythology can be openly talked about, for instance, what's the status of the bible? History? Mythology? Unacceptable only because of how many people follow it now? The mod team has decided that it would rather not go down that road, so has decided that the safest path is to render the topics off limits entirely.
(Although trying to shadow mod is also uncool. If, say, people start talking about norse mythology in another comic thread about Hel, let the mods get to it on their own time.)
-
2017-08-14, 03:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Gender
Re: Rules on discussion of religion
Sheriff: The line is real world (not allowed) vs. not real world (allowed). It's not about whether it's old or new, extant or extinct, controversial or agreed upon, or any other distinction you can think of. If it's about a real world religion (or politics), avoid it on this Forum. Give these things a wide berth.