Results 211 to 240 of 441
-
2017-10-05, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
It is harder to speed vampires-- they have more HD. The fact that a vampire is tougher, HD for HD, than a skeleton is balanced by the fact that Animate Dead gives the caster the power to create undead, while Rapid Vamp only makes a power you already have to create vampires more convenient and effective.
Pretty sure that Mr. Burlew doesn't show material component use regularly.
Don't forget that dusk passed, so they had two days of spells to work with. They could spam this spell before dusk, then stock up on combat useful spells. Or if they crunched the numbers and decided vamps were more valuable than spells, they could spam this spell times two, then rely on vampiric abilities.... He didn't blame me.
I ... I must succeed.
-
2017-10-05, 11:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Sometimes OOTS has the power to cancel all the bad in the world, if for but a moment.
-
2017-10-05, 11:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
So it's perhaps some sort of compromise - multiple vampire spawn per casting, but only one vampire proper?
Point conceded regarding material components not always being shown. Counter-point: unless there were stockpiles of onyx gems on the Mechane (why?), or in the Temple atop Mount Zenith (freshly created for the occasion, that's why Gontor et al were low on spells), Durkula has had no opportunity to stock up on the necessary material components - if Malack's Vampire Accelerator is that similar to Animate Dead.
We really don't know if Rich has bothered to write out a formal Malack's Vampire Accelerator spell at all; more likely, it works the way the story needs it to work. Our best way to guess how it works is therefore meta-analysis rather than the 3.5 rules-lawyership we're all so fond of.
From a meta-perspective, it seems best to me, story-wise, that Team Fangface paid a significant cost in resources of some sort to create this horde.
First, if this is easy, there is no way to stop them. Game over, they win. If it only requires them to kill a few dozen people and spend 3 mid level spell slots to create a horde like this, OotS is going to have to fight through 5 or 10 hordes to even reach the final battle.
Second, why would Malack bother to place a 3rd level spell requiring no components into his staff? He didn't create "children" often, it would have been easy to prepare the spell once per day as part of his normal load-out.
Either the horde requires significant spell slots, or the horde requires scarce resources. Otherwise, it's "broken", from a story perspective and from a D&D rules perspective.
Freely admitting that I'm guessing, I think this is *not* something Team Fangface can do casually.This ... is my signature finishing move!
"It's never good when you make a fiend cringe" - MadGrady
According to some online quiz, I'm a 6th level TN Wizard. They didn't give me full XP for all the monsters I've defeated while daydreaming.
http://easydamus.com/character.html
I am a Ranger Archetype: Gleaming Warden (thx to Ninja Prawn)
-
2017-10-05, 12:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Now those words that everyone playing D&D waits to hear....
Roll for initiative!!
I wonder if the vampires will get a surprise round on some of the the Order?
-
2017-10-05, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
-
2017-10-05, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
It's worse than that - in 1088 the vampires discuss resting and regaining spells. So all those spells they cast to animate the vampires? They'll be at full strength when they meet OOTS before the dwarven council vote.
How to turn off these annoying .sigs:
- Edit your profile options.
- Scroll down to "Visible Post Elements".
- Uncheck "Show Signatures".
- Save changes.
- Enjoy a much less cluttered and noisy forum.
-
2017-10-05, 12:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
I would guess probably not.
A spell you like having available but won't come up often enough to justify having the slot occupied "just in case" sounds like exactly the kind of thing to have in magic item form, to me.
Or the actual impact of the horde as a whole will be negligible enough that it isn't worth worrying about the specifics, like what happened to its cousin horde.FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2017-10-05, 12:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
I suspect that Rich will, at the very least, probably throw a dart on a board to pick out a spell level, just so he has a sort of general idea of how much power Greg loses when he prepares that particular spell, should he ever actually decide that Greg is preparing it some more. Given that Greg's lifespan can probably be measured in hours now, I doubt he will prepare it again, but hey, plot twists happen.
“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2017-10-05, 12:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
-
2017-10-05, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-10-05, 01:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Yeah "cheap" is the definition I think of it too. Hopefully there'll be some tradeoff or equivalent exchange that had to be paid to counterbalance the OP.
I suppose it's a matter of opinion but I always enjoyed more those kind of stories where the villains get things done by their own worth and craftiness and tricking the heroes by themselves rather than "rule-tweaking on the side" and asspulls. A villain that's dangerous because he's good at what he does always feels more compelling than one with luck and a GM by his side.
Giving the villains an edge to make the heroes' victory greater is always good and nice but you have to keep restraint in mind, otherwise the story will get that feeling of "cheesiness" when things go just a little bit too well too often "on just one side".
I suppose it's a matter of personal standards in appreciating storytelling.Last edited by Ganbatte; 2017-10-05 at 01:16 PM.
-
2017-10-05, 01:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
-
2017-10-05, 01:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
-
2017-10-05, 01:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
And why is it cheap for vampires when it is not for shadows, spectres, wraiths or wights?
As to a trade-off, there has been none, nor will there be for this group. Whatever spells they used are replenished, and this idea it would cost XP to accelerate soemthing that would happen anyway is unsupported by any other spell I can think of. Teleport accelerates going from A to B, and no-one pays XP for it, even if it does save them 3 days of walking.
Not really. I'd say they're about equally relevant, given that both were used by or on Durkon. In fact, I'd say the ability of the vampires to skip the wait has been far more plot critical than Durkon's failed spell (although the door is open for it to be relevant down the line)
Grey WolfLast edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-10-05 at 01:23 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-10-05, 01:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Uh ... that horde ran into the most powerful assembly of clerics in the region of the Northern Pantheon. That's not healthy for vampires.
There is a non-negligible cost associated with making a staff and loading a spell into it. Malack said his staff had "many obscure spells". If Malack's Vampire Accelerator is of level L, and is cast at the minimum possible level of the greater of CL=(8 or L*2-1), the cost is 187.5*L*CL, assuming it's not one of the top two spells. For level 3, that's 4500. For level 4, 6000. It's twice that cost if Malack's Vampire Accelerator is the highest level spell in the staff. If it isn't, though, the requirement for the caster level to be the same for all spells in the staff kicks in; if there's even one spell that Malack wanted at CL 10, Malack's Vampire Accelerator is also CL 10 and 25% more expensive.
Making a wand of only a single spell costs 5,625 GP for level 3, 10,500 for level 4.
Making a scroll costs 187.5 GP for level 3, 350 GP for level 4.
If he's only going to cast it once in a while, why not a scroll?This ... is my signature finishing move!
"It's never good when you make a fiend cringe" - MadGrady
According to some online quiz, I'm a 6th level TN Wizard. They didn't give me full XP for all the monsters I've defeated while daydreaming.
http://easydamus.com/character.html
I am a Ranger Archetype: Gleaming Warden (thx to Ninja Prawn)
-
2017-10-05, 01:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Half of which were defending the vampires, not attacking them, and proved to be very healthy for the vampires, in the form of healing, bolstering and protection from various energy sources.
Because he can easily afford all those really rather minimal costs, given that he has the resources of an entire country at his disposal? You really think he can't afford to gift himself a 20k GP staff? And of course a staff with all the minor spells he might need in a rare case is better than hauling a large amount of scrolls. Also, staffs can be crafted to be rechargeable. When you expect to unlive forever, a staff becomes economical quickly. How many times could he have cast the Protection from Sun from scrolls before it became more expensive than to do it from a rechargeable staff?
Grey WolfInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-10-05, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
The Vampire spawn were a surprise-- both to the audience and to the party. But they shouldn't have been. The clues to realize Durkon* would do this were there if we had seen them. That's excellent misdirection, not cheese.
Durkon* didn't get that spell as a sudden deus ex gift. He learned a spell we had every reason to suspect how powerful it would be, and every reason to realize he had the opportunity to learn it.
We saw Malack create an army of mummies. We saw vampire spawn taken out in one or two hits at Godsmoot, from which we can conclude they aren't individually strong enough that an army of them is particularly different from an army of mummies. We saw Durkon* sequestered in his cabin doing eldritch things to Malack's staff.
Durkon* planned, deceived, and worked for this reveal. It seemed sudden to us and to the protagonists, but it was not sudden, it was not unearned cheese. It only seemed sudden to us because Mr. Burlew did a great job at his shell game-- and to the protagonists because Durkon* succeeded at his shell game likewise.Last edited by alwaysbebatman; 2017-10-05 at 01:46 PM.
... He didn't blame me.
I ... I must succeed.
-
2017-10-05, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
-
2017-10-05, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
-
2017-10-05, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2017-10-05 at 02:07 PM.
Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-10-05, 02:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
That guy is not crafty enough for you ? He has the Order and the reader dancing to his tune like he was Mozart reborn ! He manipuled the Order into bringing him to a secret meeting he should not have known existed without it being suspicious despite a GOD trying to warn them, he spawned a horde of cleric-vampires when he saw an opportunity and hijacked Roy's plan on the off-chance a demi-god would change his mind, he spawned a SECOND horde as part of Odin knows what other preparations he has and he almost killed Roy in one-on-one combat.
And he had no time to prepare that !
This is in no way an ass-pull, the spell's existence was explained before and he already used it in the exact same way !
RC and Xykon getting a thousand-strong army out of nowhere that was an ass-pull. This is not.
Yes that spell is convienient but it is not the magically-able-to-resist-any-of-the-heroes-power convienient that you see in some other (inferior) stories.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2017-10-05, 02:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Exactly. Story-wise, the horde covered the escape of HPoH and three other vampires. Soaking fire was the extent of its significance, and that doesn't need a dedicated explanation.
The primary feature of a staff is that you use your own caster level (and save DC) instead of the staff's, if it's higher. If you've got multiple obscure spells for esoteric scenarios, that have dependencies on caster level and/or saves; you can get a lot of mileage out of loading up a staff so the option is there if a call for it comes up, and you don't need to rebuild every time you gain a caster level (to say nothing of saves, which are the minimum possible when cast from a typical magic item).
Overlooking the "why isn't a character in Order of the Stick playing optimally" angle....I don't think he was expecting to cast it once a while. I don't think he was expecting to want to cast it again at all, until he was in the situation, but there was no point in throwing out the staff just because of that.FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2017-10-05, 02:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
-
2017-10-05, 02:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
-
2017-10-05, 02:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
The creation cost of a staff is in GP, so was basically nothing for Malack who had the resources of an empire behind him.
The creation cost of a staff is even MORE irrelevant when you didn't create the staff at all, but yoinked it from your deceased creator's ashes.
ETA: Also, the number of charges on the staff were limited only in theory. It was never established how many charges the staff had, so it was limited only by plot.
Contrariwise, Durkon's use of this spell has a hard daily limit, and he has to use spell slots that he then can't use for other spells.
(Now, if we're right that it's a third level spell and quickness caster level * 2 HD of Vamps per casting, that limit is REALLY high, if he knows he won't need his slots for anything else before dusk.)Last edited by alwaysbebatman; 2017-10-05 at 02:44 PM.
... He didn't blame me.
I ... I must succeed.
-
2017-10-05, 02:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
No it doesn't. Anything that can be done by a staff created by a level 12 character (Malack) should be easily reproducible by a level 15 character.
There are endless examples of powerful magic that V can do practically at will. They even won a fight on that basis alone. There is literally no reason for your complain. We knew it could be done, we had seen it in action, and we saw Greg take steps to learn the ability. Nothing in this sequence of events requires this to cost XP, or to use levels of magic that weren't available to Malack. Accelerating the vampire resurrection, therefore, is not as expensive as you are asserting is must be.
GWInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est
-
2017-10-05, 02:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Maybe some ... but Sunna's cleric, among others, seems to have switched sides. And my sense is that the bodyguards on the balcony were pretty much united in their desire to rain death upon the insufficiently dead.
The cost to Malack also includes 1 day per 1,000 GP of the spell - and while he expects to live forever, that doesn't mean he wants to spend a week, more or less, loading a spell into the staff that he could simply and easily prepare as part of the ~35 spells prepared daily?
Malack never expected to encounter an enemy without warning, which is why Nale's attack worked. His daily preparations didn't need to be combat-optimal.This ... is my signature finishing move!
"It's never good when you make a fiend cringe" - MadGrady
According to some online quiz, I'm a 6th level TN Wizard. They didn't give me full XP for all the monsters I've defeated while daydreaming.
http://easydamus.com/character.html
I am a Ranger Archetype: Gleaming Warden (thx to Ninja Prawn)
-
2017-10-05, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
It's funny because you keep throwing around technicalities and nitpicks that have nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
-
2017-10-05, 02:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Wouldn't you like to know
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Nobody knows what you're talking about, because your arguments don't hold up at all.... and you are the one nitpicking.
Last edited by alwaysbebatman; 2017-10-05 at 02:47 PM.
... He didn't blame me.
I ... I must succeed.
-
2017-10-05, 02:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
Re: OOTS #1101 - The Discussion Thread
Ah yes, more passive-aggressive assertions and implying that I'm dumb. For a second I forgot on which forum I was.