Results 481 to 482 of 482
-
2019-02-10, 11:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Gender
Re: Yet another thread on Hilgya's alignment
While alignment is theoretically descriptive rather than prescriptive, most frequently its being used within the context of D&D, and players creating characters whole cloth. It is significantly easier to start with broad strokes concepts like "believes in personal freedoms" and "is an altruist" (ie is Chaotic Good) than it is to pick a bunch of situations, decide how they would act, and then pick one of the nine labels from then sum of those situations.
Also, people usually have fairly consistent patterns of behavior. Somebody is not going to like something one minute and dislike it the next. So we can look at somebody and say "ok, what they have done so far is chaotic, so most likely they wont deviate from that umbrella in their future actions." Its not a deterministic factor, but it can be used to predict behavior, to a degree.“Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same. Proportions are negotiated, boundaries blurred. I'm not a pious hermit, I haven't done only good in my life. But if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all.”
-
2019-02-11, 09:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: Yet another thread on Hilgya's alignment
This. One single action cannot determine someone's alignment. This is especially so in OotS, which has established that not even familicide permanently locks you into an alignment. The best way to determine a character's alignment is to look for a pattern across all their actions - just like the Deva did it for Roy.
Grey WolfInterested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.There is a world of imagination
Deep in the corners of your mind
Where reality is an intruder
And myth and legend thrive
Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est