Results 151 to 180 of 455
-
2019-03-18, 09:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
-
2019-03-18, 09:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- San Francisco
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
The eyeless worm being able to detect invisibility at long range feels a little unfair.
-
2019-03-18, 09:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2019-03-18, 09:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
" 'Sorry, did I say something wrong?' said Marvin, dragging himself on regardless. 'Pardon me for breathing, which I never do anyway so I don't know why I bother to say it, "
-
2019-03-18, 09:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
-
2019-03-18, 09:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Not to my knowledge. This online stuff doesn't count.
But fine, yeah, I mean, they obviously have a plan here. But if I were V at this point probably, oh. I don't know. Reverse gravity maybe, it is hard to tell how big the creature really is based on what we've seen, so maybe the entire thing would go flying up. No SR, no save. Ideally it could get both of them.
Yes, they could dispel it, but that's not a guarantee. It is a very useful spell all in all, because if they dispel it after one round then they fall again - maybe with luck get 20d6 worth of damage - 10 each way.
Other options would be rock to mud or a greater shout at the ceiling. I'd have to chat with the DM on how he'd do that before casting though. Can't vote if I bring the whole thing down, so pure unmitigated destruction is a perfectly valid way of saving the world here.
-
2019-03-18, 10:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Mobile, AL
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
I suspect that seeing this in book form may also be a reason. Rich may have selected this color to allow details to still be visible when put into the book format. He has noted in the past where he selected a color for the online comic and it turned out to be completely unusable for a book.
FTDWIR
-
2019-03-18, 10:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
-
2019-03-18, 10:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Yorkshire, England
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
I think Blackwing is also busy looking for the worm food.
-
2019-03-18, 10:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Skyron, Andromeda
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
I love the Nightcrawler. Partly because the Monty Python jokes write themselves, but also partly because he’ll definitely make an interesting fight for the Order. I wonder if, so as not to upstage the fight with the former High Priest of Hel, something is going to happen so that it’s not quite a full fight. Something like the Nightcrawler leaving early, or the Order having a surprise up their sleeve.
Also, it took me a little longer than I’d like to admit to get what Blackwing was saying. Poor raven.
-
2019-03-18, 10:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Loving this creature's attitude
I'm looking forwards to this battle.
-
2019-03-18, 11:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
-
2019-03-18, 11:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
there's a point in power in a campaign that using invisibility (as 2nd spell level Invisibility) is just plain insulting.
Everybody gets it so early.
Any villain worth its salt (like, more than 3HD) will know about invisibility.
Even belkar knows about the IMPROVED invisibility ffs
-
2019-03-18, 11:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
[QUOTE=hamishspence;23784646]Nightcrawlers have See Invisibility as an at-will spell-like ability:
OMG that's SO broken.
What about a nice Pathfinder nightcrawler that gets a charisma bonus to HP and more cold spells?
Yah baby. No "see invisibility" any more!
(I use nightshades to stalk my silver dragon-led party ...so it's only fair that they can stalk back!)
-
2019-03-18, 11:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
If we're trying an Irresistable Dance spell, can we toss in a Hideous Laughter as well? I want to see if Wormy has a better Evil LaughTM than the Exarch.
-
2019-03-19, 12:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
It didn't seem like they landed gently when the Frost Giants dispelled magic on V and Haley during the fight in http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots1059.html
That was the strip I was using as precedence that they would fall and not gently. At least it seemed pretty hard in 1059 when compared to the time V used feather fall on Haley when she was defenestrated out of Tarquin's palace.
Thanks for the answering!
-
2019-03-19, 12:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
I bet 100gp V is using Sunburst in the next strips.
Let me tell you, "safe" is for NPCs. I live on the edge.
-
2019-03-19, 01:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Location
- SoCal
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
He's pretty funny for a death-worm.
-
2019-03-19, 01:23 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Guys, I think that the worm is immortal and unkillable. Think about it: No eyes = No X's for eyes = No death!
-
2019-03-19, 01:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Wait, the giant worm doesn't have eyes... So it cannot die, right?
EDIT: dammit, ninja'd.Last edited by ratfox; 2019-03-19 at 02:08 AM.
-
2019-03-19, 01:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Tokyo
- Gender
-
2019-03-19, 02:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Location
- South France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
can the three dwarves bluff their way in by saying they are thralls?
It's "locksmith of LOVE!" not "LO!"
-
2019-03-19, 02:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
That worm has all the makings of an underling who takes instructions so literally that it's effectively useless. I mean, if the OOTS fly in over the platform then the worm doesn't need to take any action, right?!
-
2019-03-19, 02:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2019-03-19, 05:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Reading, England
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Indeed, if you're a Cleric that can cast Invisibility Purge and didn't prepare it, you're a fool. Unless your party has other countermeasures to Invisibility.
If you're a mage of the appropriate level and didn't prepare Invisibility, you're also a fool. Even if you know the enemy has countermeasures, you can usually get a tactical advantage before the invisibility fails.Matthew Greet
My purpose in life is to play games.
-
2019-03-19, 05:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
From memory, aren't crows and ravens mechanically identical in 3.5? So that's a fun little thing there in this episode, nobody can tell them apart except via fluff
It is cool to see an intelligent worm though. Unsurprisingly uncommon in most media.
On invisibility, even at the lowest levels (like 1-5) I've seen wizards tend to prep glitterdust or carry bags of flour on their person because ugh invisibilityLast edited by Malphegor; 2019-03-19 at 05:59 AM.
OI YOU! Join this one Discord where people talk 3.5 stuff! Also chicken infested related things! It’s pretty rad! https://discord.gg/6HmgXhUZ
-
2019-03-19, 07:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
-
2019-03-19, 07:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Won't touch the nightcrawler, as you already imply, but it'd wreck shop on the two vampires. What are the odds it would kill both of them outright?
Since that can't happen---hard to have a dramatic vote if the entity beguiling the voters gets ashed in an instant---I predict the Giant will find some way to quickly nerf V. Despite what Doug wrote earlier in the thread, would dispelling V's fly spell, especially while V was in the middle of casting, cause the spell to fizzle or for V to be sufficiently injured to take hir out of the fight?
-
2019-03-19, 08:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Lake Wobegon
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1159 - The Discussion Thread
Nil. One's already through the orange barrier through which spells cannot pass, and the other will be through it in short order, likely before Vaarsuvius can cast anything.
Since that can't happen---hard to have a dramatic vote if the entity beguiling the voters gets ashed in an instant---I predict the Giant will find some way to quickly nerf V. Despite what Doug wrote earlier in the thread, would dispelling V's fly spell, especially while V was in the middle of casting, cause the spell to fizzle or for V to be sufficiently injured to take hir out of the fight?
-
2019-03-19, 08:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2018